Dataset Information

Transmission study of the Abdominal Compression plate (BodyFIX Diaphragm Control) for abdominal and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Abdominal Compression is one of the methods available to minimize breathing motion during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), particularly for abdominal malignancies. It might be necessary to treat some tumors with radiation entering through the compression device. One clinically available compression plate device (Elekta BodyFIX Diaphragm Control) was evaluated to understand its impact on dosimetry during clinical treatments.

Methods

The BodyFIX compression device was CT scanned following departmental stereo scanning protocols. Treatment planning system (TPS) calculations were used to determine attenuation ratios through each section of the compression device: the outer frame, compression plate, and higher density couch fixation points and compression screw. TPS calculated skin doses where the compression plate will come in contact with the skin were recorded. All attenuation ratio fields were measured on an Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator. Where differences in attenuation were observed, TPS density overrides were found to bring calculated doses into agreement with measurement.

Results

The compression plate and frame showed low dose attenuation (3%-4%). Only minor density overrides for the frame were required due to artefacts from the limited CT field-of-view. The high-density materials in the couch fixation points resulted in higher attenuation (14%-20%). Similarly, the compression screw recorded very high attenuation (44%-65%), depending on the length of screw used. Skin doses assessed from the TPS calculations showed dose build-up under the compression plate that would result in skin receiving the maximum dose.

Conclusion

Compression devices can cause significant dose attenuation. Density overrides for TPS calculations are recommended for correcting attenuation in some sections of the device. High-density structures like the fixation screw and frame fixation points create high levels of dosimetric uncertainty, and beam entry through those areas has been disallowed.

SUBMITTER: Vaithianathan H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8425938 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose:We aimed to retrospectively assess the incidence of vertebral compression fractures (VCF), examine clinicopathologic factors potentially associated with VCF, and evaluate treatment response in patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases (spMets). Methods and Materials:We identified 78 patients with 125 spMets at baseline and subsequent assessments. Patients received SBRT doses of 16 or 18 Gy. Patients with pre-existing VCF and co-existing local progression were excluded. Spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) was used for spMets categorization. Response to SBRT and VCF were assessed according to the Positron Emission tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Genant scores, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess local control of disease and vertebral compression fracture-free survival (FFS). Results:We treated 103 cases with single spMets and 11 cases involving double spMets with SBRT. Progressive disease was reported in 3.2% and 8.2% of the cases in the first and last PET/CT reports, respectively. The distribution of treatment response in the remaining patients was: complete response in 30.6% of patients, partial response in 47.1% of patients, and stable disease in 22.3% of patients in the first PET/CT; complete response in 62.3% of patients, partial response in 16.7% of patients, and stable disease in 21% of patients at the last monitoring. Local failures were observed in 15 (12%) of cases. Median SINS was 5 (range: 1-13); majority of patients in our cohort (70.4%) were categorized as stable according to SINS, five (4%) patients had Grade 3 VCF at a median time of 16 months after SBRT (range: 2-22 months), and 60% of VCF occurred after an interval of at least 12 months after SBRT. No bisphosphonate usage was significantly associated with VCF (r = -0.204; p = 0.022). Median FFS was 21 months. Univariate analyses indicated that female gender (p < 0.001), bisphosphonate use (p = 0.005), >6 months of bisphosphonates use (p = 0.002), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.023) were associated with higher FFS. Female gender (p = 0.007), >6 months of bisphosphonates usage (p = 0.018), and the lowest vertebral body collapse score (p = 0.044) retained independent significance. Conclusions:This study demonstrated that spine SBRT with doses of 16-18 Gy promises good local control of disease with acceptable VCF rates. Lowest vertebral body collapse score, female gender, and >6 months of bisphosphonate use were significantly associated with longer FFS.

Project description:Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in males. There are a number of options for patients with localized early stage disease, including active surveillance for low-risk disease, surgery, brachytherapy, and external beam radiotherapy. Increasingly, external beam radiotherapy, in the form of dose-escalated and moderately hypofractionated regimens, is being utilized in prostate cancer, with randomized evidence to support their use. Stereotactic body radiotherapy, which is a form of extreme hypofractionation, delivered with high precision and conformality typically over 1 to 5 fractions, offers a more contemporary approach with several advantages including being non-invasive, cost-effective, convenient for patients, and potentially improving patient access. In fact, one study has estimated that if half of the patients currently eligible for conventional fractionated radiotherapy in the United States were treated instead with stereotactic body radiotherapy, this would result in a total cost savings of US$250 million per year. There is also a strong radiobiological rationale to support its use, with prostate cancer believed to have a low ?/? ratio and therefore being preferentially sensitive to larger fraction sizes. To date, there are no published randomized trials reporting on the comparative efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to alternative treatment modalities, although multiple randomized trials are currently accruing. Yet, early results from the randomized phase III study of HYPOfractionated RadioTherapy of intermediate risk localized Prostate Cancer (HYPO-RT-PC) trial, as well as multiple single-arm phase I/II trials, indicate low rates of late adverse effects with this approach. In patients with low- to intermediate-risk disease, excellent biochemical relapse-free survival outcomes have been reported, albeit with relatively short median follow-up times. These promising early results, coupled with the enormous potential cost savings and implications for resource availability, suggest that stereotactic body radiotherapy will take center stage in the treatment of prostate cancer in the years to come.