Dataset Information

The Efficacy of Pyrotinib as a Third- or Higher-Line Treatment in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Exposed to Lapatinib Compared to Lapatinib-Naive Patients: A Real-World Study

ABSTRACT: Background: Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Evidence of the efficacy of pyrotinib-based treatments for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients exposed to lapatinib is limited. Methods: Ninety-four patients who received pyrotinib as a third- or higher-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC were included in this retrospective study. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were implemented to balance important patient characteristics between groups. Results: Thirty (31.9%) patients were pretreated with lapatinib and subsequently received pyrotinib as an anti-HER2 treatment, and 64 (68.1%) patients did not receive this treatment. The OS and PFS indicated a beneficial trend in lapatinib-naive group compared to lapatinib-treated group in either the original cohort (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.36 months, p = 0.05; OS: 20.73 vs 14.35 months, p = 0.08) or the PSM (PFS: 9.02 vs 6.08 months, p = 0.07; OS: 19.07 vs 18.00 months, p = 0.61) or IPTW (PFS: 9.90 vs 6.17 months, p = 0.05; OS: 19.53 vs 15.10 months, p = 0.08) cohorts. Subgroup analyses demonstrated lapatinib treatment-related differences in PFS in the premenopausal subgroup and the no prior trastuzumab treatment subgroup, but no significant differences were observed in OS. Conclusion: Pyrotinib-based therapy demonstrated promising effects in HER2-positive MBC patients in a real-world study, especially in lapatinib-naive patients, and also some activity in lapatinib-treated patients.

SUBMITTER: Ouyang D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8428978 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib-pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population.

Project description:At present, local therapy, such as surgery and radiotherapy, is the mainstay treatment for brain metastasis and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy has been shown to be efficacious for HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastasis. However, Clinical studies comparing the combined effects of the two treatments are lacking. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib and radiotherapy versus pyrotinib-based therapy in treating HER2+ BC patients with brain metastasis. This retrospective, observational study collected data from 79 HER2+ BC patients with brain metastasis who received pyrotinib-based therapy from May 2018 to December 2021. Among these patients, 35 received pyrotinib-based therapy concurrently with, or within 3 months before or after, brain radiotherapy (Group A), and 44 received pyrotinib-based therapy as the primary regimen (with no restriction as to whether they had received brain radiotherapy previously or not, the interval between receiving radiotherapy and receiving pyrotinib was >3 months) (Group B). Patient information was collected by the Electronic Medical Records System. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), the clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. The assessment of adverse effects was based on CTCAE5.0. The intracranial ORRs were 48.6% in Group A and 20.5% (9/44) in Group B (P=0.015). The intracranial CBRs were 80.0% in Group A and 65.9% in Group B. The median intracranial PFS times (IC-PFS) were 15.0 months and 9.0 months in Group A and Group B, respectively (P=0.385). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (95.0 vs. 98.0 months, P=0.872). The subgroup analysis showed that patients with active brain metastasis who received pyrotinib and radiotherapy had a longer IC-PFS time than those who received pyrotinib-based therapy(P=0.056). No serious adverse reactions (e.g., acute brain edema, cognitive dysfunction, or treatment-related death events) were observed. Pyrotinib combined with radiotherapy is recommended for HER2+ breast cancer active brain metastasis patients who can tolerate radiotherapy and pyrotinib. Pyrotinib-based therapy may be considered for patients who cannot tolerate radiotherapy and pyrotinib.

Dataset Information

The Efficacy of Pyrotinib as a Third- or Higher-Line Treatment in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Exposed to Lapatinib Compared to Lapatinib-Naive Patients: A Real-World Study

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets