Dataset Information

Diagnostic Value of Seven Different Imaging Modalities for Patients with Neuroblastic Tumors: A Network Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the diagnostic value of seven different imaging modalities for the detection of neuroblastic tumors in diverse clinical settings.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify eligible studies from inception to Sep 29, 2020. Quality assessment of included studies was appraised with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Firstly, direct pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled estimates of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and DR. Next, NMA using Bayesian methods was performed. The superiority index was assessed to quantify the rank probability of a diagnostic test. The studies performed SPECT/CT or SPECT were analyzed separately from the ones only performed planar imaging.

Results

A total of 1135 patients from 32 studies, including 7 different imaging modalities, were eligible for this NMA. In the pairwise meta-analysis, ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT had a relatively high value of all the outcomes (sensitivity: 10.195 [5.332-19.493]; specificity: 17.906 [5.950-53.884]; NPV: 16.819 [7.033-40.218]; PPV: 11.154 [4.216-29.512]; and DR 5.616 [3.609-8.739]). In the NMA, ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT exhibited relatively high sensitivity in all subgroups (all data: 0.94 [0.87-0.98]; primary tumor: 0.89 [0.53-1]; bone/bone marrow metastases: 0.96 [0.83-1]; and primary tumor and metastases (P + M): 0.92 [0.80-0.97]), the highest specificity in the subgroup of P + M (0.85 [0.61-0.97]), and achieved the highest superiority index in the subgroups of all data (8.57 [1-15]) and P + M (7.25 [1-13]).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT exhibited the best diagnostic performance in the comprehensive detection of primary tumor and metastases for neuroblastic tumors, followed by ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogs, ¹²³I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), ¹⁸F-FDG, and ¹³¹I-MIBG tomographic imaging.

SUBMITTER: Wang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8429030 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background To assess the feasibility and possible value of semi-automated diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) volumetry of whole neuroblastic tumors with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Pediatric patients who underwent surgical resection of neuroblastic tumors at our institution from 2013 to 2019 and who received a preoperative MRI scan with DWI after chemotherapy were included. Tumor volume was assessed with a semi-automated approach in DWI using a dedicated software prototype. Quantitative ADC values were calculated automatically of the total tumor volume after manual exclusion of necrosis. Manual segmentation in T1 weighted and T2 weighted sequences was used as reference standard for tumor volume comparison. The Student’s t test was used for parametric data while the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for non-parametric data. Results Twenty seven patients with 28 lesions (neuroblastoma (NB): n =?19, ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB): n =?7, ganglioneuroma (GN): n =?2) could be evaluated. Mean patient age was 4.5?±?3.2?years. Median volume of standard volumetry (T1w or T2w) was 50.2?ml (interquartile range (IQR): 91.9?ml) vs. 45.1?ml (IQR: 98.4?ml) of DWI (p =?0.145). Mean ADC values (×?10??6?mm2/s) of the total tumor volume (without necrosis) were 1187?±?301 in NB vs. 1552?±?114 in GNB/GN (p =?0.037). The 5th percentile of ADC values of NB (614?±?275) and GNB/GN (1053?±?362) provided the most significant difference (p =?0.007) with an area under the curve of 0.848 (p <?0.001). Conclusions Quantitative semi-automated DWI volumetry is feasible in neuroblastic tumors with integrated analysis of tissue characteristics by providing automatically calculated ADC values of the whole tumor as well as an ADC heatmap. The 5th percentile of the ADC values of the whole tumor volume proved to be the most significant parameter for differentiation of the histopathological subtypes in our patient cohort and further investigation seems to be worthwhile. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-020-00366-3.

Project description:To evaluate differences in downstream testing, coronary revascularisation, and clinical outcomes following non-invasive diagnostic modalities used to detect coronary artery disease.Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medline, Medline in process, Embase, Cochrane Library for clinical trials, PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Clinicaltrials.gov.Diagnostic randomised controlled trials comparing non-invasive diagnostic modalities in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of low risk acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary artery disease.A random effects network meta-analysis synthesised available evidence from trials evaluating the effect of non-invasive diagnostic modalities on downstream testing and patient oriented outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Modalities included exercise electrocardiograms, stress echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging, real time myocardial contrast echocardiography, coronary computed tomographic angiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Unpublished outcome data were obtained from 11 trials.18 trials of patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome (n=11?329) and 12 trials of those with suspected stable coronary artery disease (n=22?062) were included. Among patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome, stress echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and exercise electrocardiograms resulted in fewer invasive referrals for coronary angiography than coronary computed tomographic angiography (odds ratio 0.28 (95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.57), 0.32 (0.15 to 0.71), and 0.53 (0.28 to 1.00), respectively). There was no effect on the subsequent risk of myocardial infarction, but estimates were imprecise. Heterogeneity and inconsistency were low. In patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease, an initial diagnostic strategy of stress echocardiography or single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging resulted in fewer downstream tests than coronary computed tomographic angiography (0.24 (0.08 to 0.74) and 0.57 (0.37 to 0.87), respectively). However, exercise electrocardiograms yielded the highest downstream testing rate. Estimates for death and myocardial infarction were imprecise without clear discrimination between strategies.For patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome, an initial diagnostic strategy of stress echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance is associated with fewer referrals for invasive coronary angiography and revascularisation procedures than non-invasive anatomical testing, without apparent impact on the future risk of myocardial infarction. For suspected stable coronary artery disease, there was no clear discrimination between diagnostic strategies regarding the subsequent need for invasive coronary angiography, and differences in the risk of myocardial infarction cannot be ruled out.PROSPERO registry no CRD42016049442.