Dataset Information

Aqueous Cytokine Levels Are Associated With Progression of Peripheral Anterior Synechiae After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To evaluate the association between total protein and cytokine levels in aqueous humor (AqH) and the progression of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

Methods

This prospective study included 146 consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK. Preoperative levels of total protein and 20 cytokines in AqH were measured. Using three-dimensional anterior segment optical coherence tomography, we assessed the iridotrabecular contact (ITC) area before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after DSAEK. Correlations between the total protein and cytokine levels in the AqH and ITC area were analyzed.

Results

ITC was observed in 47 eyes (32.2%) after DSAEK. The ITC area increased from 2.00 ± 4.42 mm2 preoperatively to 3.00 ± 6.85 mm2 at 12 months. The total protein level in AqH was significantly higher in eyes with ITC progression than in those without (1.45 ± 1.03 mg/mL vs. 1.00 ± 0.57; P = 0.04) and was significantly positively correlated with the progression of ITC area after DSAEK (at 6 months, r = 0.311 and P = 0.005; at 12 months, r = 0.342 and P = 0.0004). The ITC area at 12 months was significantly correlated with the preoperative AqH levels of interleukin-8 (r = 0.252; P = 0.021), interferon-γ (r = 0.318; P = 0.009), and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (r = 0.292; P = 0.004). Multivariate analyses showed that the total protein levels in AqH and the presence of preoperative ITC were significant risk factors for increased ITC area after DSAEK (β = 0.193-0.574; all P < 0.02).

Conclusions

Higher preoperative total protein and specific cytokine levels in AqH were associated with ITC formation after DSAEK.

Translational relevance

Our findings indicate that chronic pathological changes in AqH can cause PAS progression and glaucoma after DSAEK.

SUBMITTER: Kusano Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8434755 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is the most common corneal transplant procedure. A key step in the procedure is preparing the donor cornea for transplantation. This can be accomplished via 1 of 3 alternatives: surgeon cuts the cornea on the day of surgery, the cornea is precut ahead of time in an offsite facility by a trained technician, or a precut cornea is purchased from an eye bank. Currently, there is little evidence on the costs and effectiveness of these 3 strategies to allow healthcare providers decide upon the preferred method to prepare grafts.The aim of this study was to compare the costs and relative effectiveness of each strategy.The Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore Eye Bank performed both precut cornea and surgeon-cut cornea transplant services between 2009 and 2013.This study included 110 subjects who received precut cornea and 140 who received surgeon-cut cornea. Clinical outcomes and surgical duration were compared across the strategies using the propensity score matching. The cost of each strategy was estimated using the microcosting and consisted of facility costs and procedural costs including surgical duration. One-way sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis were performed.The cost for DSAEK was highest for the surgeon-cut approach ($13,965 per procedure), followed by purchasing precut corneas ($12,659) and then setting up precutting ($12,421). The higher procedural cost of the surgeon-cut approach was largely due to the longer duration of the procedure (surgeon-cut?=?72.54?minutes, precut?=?59.45?minutes, P?<?0.001) and the higher surgeon fees. There was no evidence of differences in clinical outcomes between grafts that were precut or surgeon-cut. Threshold analysis demonstrated that if the number of cases was below 31 a year, the strategy that yielded the lowest cost was purchasing precut cornea from eye bank. If there were more than 290 cases annually, the cheapest option would be to setup precutting facility.Our findings suggest that it is more efficient for centers that are performing a large number of cornea transplants (more than 290 cases) to set up their own facility to conduct precutting.