Dataset Information

Comparison of intrahepatic progression patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases following CT-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Given the metachronous and multifocal occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal cancer metastases in the liver (CRLM), this study aimed to compare intrahepatic progression patterns after computed tomography (CT)-guided high dose-rate brachytherapy.

Patients and methods

This retrospective analysis included 164 patients (114 HCC, 50 CRLM) treated with brachytherapy between January 2016 and January 2018. Patients received multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before, and about 8 weeks after brachytherapy, then every 3 months for the first, and every 6 months for the following years, until progression or death. MRI scans were assessed for local or distant intrahepatic tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 and electronic medical records were reviewed prior to therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Specifically, local and distant intra-hepatic PFS were assessed to determine differences between the intrahepatic progression patterns of HCC and CRLM. Secondary endpoints included the identification of predictors of PFS, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Statistics included Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling.

Results

PFS was longer in HCC [11.30 (1.33-35.37) months] than in CRLM patients [8.03 (0.73-19.80) months, p = 0.048], respectively. Specifically, local recurrence occurred later in HCC [PFS: 36.83 (1.33-40.27) months] than CRLM patients [PFS: 12.43 (0.73-21.90) months, p = 0.001]. In contrast, distant intrahepatic progression occurred earlier in HCC [PFS: 13.50 (1.33-27.80) months] than in CRLM patients [PFS: 19.80 (1.43-19.80) months, p = 0.456] but without statistical significance. Multivariate Cox regression confirmed tumor type and patient age as independent predictors for PFS.

Conclusion

Brachytherapy proved to achieve better local tumor control and overall PFS in patients with unresectable HCC as compared to those with CRLM. However, distant progression preceded local recurrence in HCC. As a result, these findings may help design disease-specific surveillance strategies and personalized treatment planning that highlights the strengths of brachytherapy. They may also help elucidate the potential benefits of combinations with other loco-regional or systemic therapies.

SUBMITTER: Xu H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8442486 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To compare the outcomes of localized prostate cancer treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), we examined 924 patients treated with HDR-BT + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 500 patients treated with LDR-BT ± EBRT using multi-institutional retrospective data. The HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. To reduce background selection bias, we performed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis using propensity scores and excluded patients with T3b-4 disease/ initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels > 50 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rates (5y-bNED) were 96.3% and 95.7% in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively. The corresponding values were 100% and 96.5% in the low-risk group; 97.4% and 97.1% in the intermediate-risk group (97.2% and 97% in the higher titer group and 97.5% and 94.6% in the lower titer group, respectively); and 95.7% and 94.9% in the selected high-risk group, respectively. IPTW correction indicated no significant difference among the groups. The 5y-bNED in the HDR-BT + EBRT, LDR-BT + EBRT, and LDR-BT alone groups were 96.3%, 95.5%, and 97%, respectively (P = 0.3011). The corresponding values were 97.4%, 94.7%, and 96.6% (P = 0.1004) in the intermediate-risk group (97.5%, 100%, and 94.5% in the lower titer group [P = 0.122] and 97.2%, 96.2%, and 100% [P = 0.664] in the higher titer group, respectively) and 95.7%, 95.5%, and 100% (P = 0.859) in the high-risk group, respectively. The HDR-BT group showed a lower incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicities; the incidence of other early and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were similar between the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups. Acute genitourinary toxicity predicted the occurrence of late genitourinary toxicity. EBRT increased the risk of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. HDR-BT + EBRT is a good alternative to LDR-BT ± EBRT for low-, intermediate-, and selected high-risk patients.