Practical Applications of Concomitant Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendix Closure Device Implantation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: van Rijn D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8446027 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundIn patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, an estimated 90% of thrombi are located in the left atrial appendage. The WATCHMAN device is a left atrial appendage closure device that is an alternative therapeutic option to reduce the risk of systemic embolization in patients who are intolerant of long-term oral anticoagulation. It can be deployed in the left atrial appendage using a transseptal approach via the femoral vein. Transhepatic venous access is an alternative route for the delivery of the device in a patient with difficult vascular access.Case summaryAn 81-year-old man with persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and diabetes mellitus was deemed a poor candidate for anticoagulation due to recurrent falls and gastrointestinal bleeding. He was selected for a left atrial appendage closure. The initial procedure was aborted after significant resistance to device advancement was encountered in the right femoral vein. Lower extremity venography demonstrated totally occluded femoral and iliac veins bilaterally. The decision was made to implant the device via a transhepatic approach. The procedure had no complications and the patient was discharged on rivaroxaban and aspirin after 3 days.DiscussionTranshepatic venous access is a viable option in patients with poor femoral access for implantation of the WATCHMAN device. It can be done safely. Knowledge of this procedural alternative can greatly enhance patient care.
| S-EPMC7891241 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Blood clots (90%) originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients and are a major cause of embolic stroke. Long-term anticoagulation therapy has been used to prevent thrombus formation, but its use is limited in patients at a high risk for bleeding complications. Thus, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices for LAA occlusion are well-established as an alternative to the anticoagulation therapy. However, the anticoagulation therapy is still required for at least 45 days post-implantation to bridge the time until complete LAA occlusion by neoendocardium coverage of the device. In this study, we applied an endothelium-mimicking nanomatrix to the LAAC device membrane for delivery of nitric oxide (NO) to enhance endothelialization, with the goal of possibly being able to reduce the duration of the anticoagulation therapy. The nanomatrix was uniformly coated on the LAAC device membranes and provided sustained release of NO for up to 1 month in vitro. In addition, the nanomatrix coating promoted endothelial cell proliferation and reduced platelet adhesion compared to the uncoated device membranes in vitro. The nanomatrix-coated and uncoated LAAC devices were then deployed in a canine LAA model for 22 days as a pilot study. All LAAC devices were not completely covered by neoendocardium 22 days post-implantation. However, histology image analysis showed that the nanomatrix-coated LAAC device had thicker neoendocardium coverage compared to the uncoated device. Therefore, our in vitro and in vivo results indicate that the nanomatrix coating has the potential to enhance endothelialization on the LAAC device membrane, which could improve patient outcomes by shortening the need for extended anticoagulation treatment.
| S-EPMC9205336 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe combined procedure of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated its efficacy and safety. However, there is still a lack of comparative investigations regarding the long-term benefits of the combined procedure when compared to LAAC alone. Our study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of combined procedure of LAAC with concomitant PVI in comparison with a propensity matched LAAC alone group.MethodsPropensity score matching (PSM) was employed to rectify covariate imbalances, resulting in the inclusion of 153 comparable patients from the initial cohort of 333 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Clinical outcomes, encompassing thrombotic events, major cardiocerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE), re-hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), and atrial tachycardia (AT), were juxtaposed between the two groups. Bleeding events and peri-device complications, such as residual flow, device-related thrombus, and device replacement, were also compared. Additionally, a patients group underwent PVI alone was included for comparing AF recurrence rates between the PVI alone group and the combined group.ResultsFollowing PSM, 153 patients (mean age 70.3 ± 8.9, 62.7% men) were included, with 102 undergoing the combined procedure and 51 undergoing LAAC alone. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 37.6 ± 7.9 months, and two patients were lost to follow-up in the combined procedure group. Thrombotic events were observed in 4 (7.8%) patients in the LAAC alone group and 4 (4.0%) in the combined group (Log-rank p = 0.301). The proportion of patients experiencing MACCE, re-hospitalization due to CVD, and AT between the two groups was comparable, as were bleeding events and peri-device complications. Among patients from the combined procedure group without AF recurrence, a significant difference was noted in prior-procedure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVEF at the 12th month after the procedure (57.2% ± 7.1% vs. 60.5% ± 6.5%, p = 0.002).ConclusionThe concomitant PVI and LAAC procedure did not increase procedure-related complications, nor did it confer significant benefits in preventing thrombotic events or reducing other cardiovascular events. However, the combined procedure improved heart function, suggesting potential long-term benefits.
| S-EPMC10837861 | biostudies-literature
Project description:An 86-year-old woman experienced hypoxia with right-to-left flow across an iatrogenic atrial septal defect after deployment of a left atrial appendage closure device. Emergent closure of the defect was performed with an atrial septal occluder device with resolution of hypoxia. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
| S-EPMC9434646 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Embolization of a device in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is an uncommon complication. We present an illustrative case of successful percutaneous retrieval of an embolized LAmbre device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) that was achieved with a combination of a snaring technique and forceps grasping and by using a steerable guiding catheter. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
| S-EPMC8311156 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLeft atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is considered a valid alternative for the prevention of thromboembolic stroke in patients with persistent left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) despite adequate anticoagulation. However, the data on LAAC using the LAmbre device for patients with LAAT is limited. This study was performed to explore efficacy and safety as well as to share the experience of the modified LAAC procedure with the LAmbre device.Materials and methodsA total of 7 patients with persistent LAAT despite adequate anticoagulation underwent modified LAAC with the LAmbre device between November 2019 and April 2022. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed 3 months postoperatively to detect device-related thrombosis and peridevice leak. The patients' clinical events were evaluated during the perioperative and follow-up periods.ResultsThe median age, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score of all patients were 71 [53-73], 3 [2-4], and 2 [2-3], respectively. In the procedure, a cerebral protection system was used in two patients. LAAC with the LAmbre device was successfully performed in all patients without perioperative events. During the median follow-up of 383 [325-865] days, postoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed in six (85.7%) patients. Device-related thrombosis was detected in one (16.7%) patient, and no significant peridevice leak was observed. No thromboembolic event or bleeding event occurred in any patients.ConclusionLAAC with the LAmbre device is effective and safe when performed by experienced operators in highly selected patients with LAAT after adequate anticoagulation.
| S-EPMC9729287 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe role of the spatial relationship between the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) and left atrial appendage (LAA) is unknown. We sought to evaluate whether an abutting LAA and LSPV play a role in AF recurrence after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF.MethodsConsecutive patients, who underwent initial point-by-point radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF at the Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, between January of 2014 and December of 2017, were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent pre-procedural cardiac CT to assess left atrial (LA) and pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy. Abutting LAA-LSPV was defined as cases when the minimum distance between the LSPV and LAA was less than 2 mm.ResultsWe included 428 patients (60.7 ± 10.8 years, 35.5% female) in the analysis. AF recurrence rate was 33.4%, with a median recurrence-free time of 21.2 (8.8-43.0) months. In the univariable analysis, female sex (HR = 1.45; 95%CI = 1.04-2.01; p = 0.028), LAA flow velocity (HR = 1.01; 95%CI = 1.00-1.02; p = 0.022), LAA orifice area (HR = 1.00; 95%CI = 1.00-1.00; p = 0.028) and abutting LAA-LSPV (HR = 1.53; 95%CI = 1.09-2.14; p = 0.013) were associated with AF recurrence. In the multivariable analysis, abutting LAA-LSPV (adjusted HR = 1.55; 95%CI = 1.04-2.31; p = 0.030) was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence.ConclusionAbutting LAA-LSPV predisposes patients to have a higher chance for arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF.
| S-EPMC8885731 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There are conflicting data regarding whether concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) at left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is beneficial. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of concomitant MVS. Of all 73 enrolled patients, 44 patients had undergone concomitant MVS and 29 patients had not. Before LVAD implantation, MVS group had higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p = 0.04). After LVAD implantation, MVS group had higher mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output (CO). During the hemodynamic ramp study, MVS group had steeper CO slopes (0.18 [0.13 0.28] vs. 0.15 [0.08, 0.20] L/min/step; p = 0.04) at incremental LVAD speed and achieved a higher CO at the optimized set speed (5.5 [4.7, 6.9] vs. 4.9 [4.0, 5.7] L/min; p = 0.03). One-year freedom from death or heart failure readmission was statistically comparable between the two groups (61% vs. 80%, p = 0.20). Thus far, after LVAD implantation and concomitant MVS, patients had increased pulmonary hypertension, despite having higher CO and a better response of CO at incremental LVAD speed. The implication of hemodynamic features after concomitant MVS on clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.
| S-EPMC7081836 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10307589 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly performed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Both AF phenotype and left atrial (LA) volume have been shown to influence ablation outcome. The inter-relationship of the two is incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate the impact of AF phenotype vs. LA volume on outcome after PVI.Methods and resultsIn a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry of patients undergoing a first PVI, the association of AF phenotype and LA volume index (LAVI) was assessed as well as their impact on AF recurrence during follow-up. Overall, 476 patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 29% females, 65.8% paroxysmal AF). Obesity, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure were all significantly more frequent in persistent AF. After 1 year, single-procedure, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was 61.5%. Patients with paroxysmal AF had better outcomes compared with patients with persistent AF (65.6 vs. 52.7%, P = 0.003), as had patients with no/mild vs. moderate/severe LA dilation (LAVI <42 mL/m2 67.1% vs. LAVI ≥42 mL/m2 53%, P < 0.001). The combination of both parameters refined prediction of 1-year recurrence (P < 0.001). After adjustment for additional clinical risk factors in multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, both AF phenotype and LAVI ≥42 mL/m2 contributed significantly towards the prediction of 1-year recurrence.ConclusionAtrial fibrillation phenotype and LA volume are independent predictors of outcome after PVI. Persistent AF with no/mild LA dilation has a similar risk of recurrence as paroxysmal AF with a moderate/severe LA dilation and should be given similar priority for ablation.
| S-EPMC11004789 | biostudies-literature