Dataset Information

Nosocomial COVID-19 infection in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic placed obstetricians in a difficult position of continuing to perform elective cesarean delivery without the knowledge of the risk of the spread of nosocomial infection of the COVID-19 virus.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the nosocomial infection rate in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery at 2 academic institutions.

Study design

This nonrandomized prospective cohort trial evaluated patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery during the reopening phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the state of New York at 2 large volume labor and delivery units. Eligible patients with a negative preoperative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test and immunoglobulin G antibody test for COVID-19 were retested 6 to 9 days after discharge. The primary objective was the COVID-19 test conversion rate defined as a positive polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 after discharge with a negative preoperative test. This was used as a proxy for the nosocomial infection rate.

Results

A total of 136 patients were screened for participation. Of these patients, 2 tested positive for COVID-19 on preoperative testing, and 25 declined to participate. Overall, 111 patients consented to participate, and 96 patients underwent both preoperative and postoperative testing. No patient with a negative polymerase chain reaction test preoperatively, had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for the COVID-19 virus postoperatively.

Conclusion

With strict and methodical perioperative and postpartum protocols, we can limit nosocomial COVID-19 infection in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

SUBMITTER: Nizam A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8447544 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe preferred neuraxial anesthetic technique for patients with class 3 obesity undergoing elective Cesarean delivery is still under debate. We aimed to describe the anesthetic technique used in our tertiary institution across body mass index (BMI) groups and different surgical incisions.MethodIn this historical cohort study, we reviewed medical records of patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg·m-2 undergoing elective Cesarean delivery between July 2014 and December 2020. We collected data on patient characteristics, anesthetic and surgical technique, and procedural times. For data analysis, we stratified patients by BMI into three different groups: 40.0-49.9 kg·m-2, 50.0-59.9 kg·m-2, and ≥ 60.0 kg·m-2.ResultsWe included 396 deliveries, distributed as follows: 258 with a BMI 40.0-49.9 kg·m-2, 112 with a BMI 50.0-59.9 kg·m-2, and 26 with a BMI ≥ 60.0 kg·m-2. For patients with a BMI 40.0-49.9 kg·m-2, the anesthetic technique of first choice was predominantly spinal anesthesia (71%), whereas for those with a BMI ≥ 60.0 kg·m-2, spinal anesthesia was never used as the anesthetic of first choice. With regard to the surgical incision, spinal anesthesia was almost exclusively used for patients undergoing Pfannenstiel incision and was rarely used for a higher supra- or infraumbilical transverse or midline incision. The overall incidence of general anesthesia was low (7/396, 1.8%). Anesthetic time, surgical time, and operating room time increased almost twofold in patients with a BMI ≥ 60.0 kg·m-2 compared with those with a BMI of 40.0-49.9 kg·m-2.ConclusionNeuraxial anesthesia was successfully used in approximately 98% of patients with class 3 obesity undergoing elective Cesarean delivery. The choice of regional anesthesia technique varied with increasing BMI and with the planned surgical incision. Procedural times increased with increasing BMI. This information should prove useful for comparing anesthetic choices and outcomes in this challenging population.

Project description:PurposeGiving birth is the most common reason for hospital admission, with Cesarean delivery being the most frequently performed inpatient surgery. Through a needs assessment and iterative design process involving patients and obstetric anesthesiologists, we previously developed a mobile application, C-Care, for patients undergoing Cesarean delivery. The focus of C-Care is perioperative education and self-monitoring of potential anesthetic complications. This study aimed to obtain feedback on patient engagement with C-Care.MethodWe conducted a prospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 yr (n = 36) undergoing elective Cesarean delivery. Anonymous usage data were recorded for 30 days. On postoperative days 1-5, participants received daily self-monitoring questionnaires within C-Care. Fourteen days after surgery, participants received an online survey regarding satisfaction and use of C-Care.ResultsThirty-five out of 36 participants visited the application after orientation, with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 32 [31-36] yr. Each participant visited the application a median of 15 [9-31] times over 30 days and completed a median of 3 [2-4] out of five self-monitoring questionnaires. Each participant viewed a median of 4 [2-7] out of eight education topics, with the most viewed patient education topics being "Controlling Pain" and "The First Few Days". Visits to the application were highest in the first week postpartum. Of the 18 respondents who completed the day 14 survey, 83% (n = 15) participants would recommend C-Care to other women, and the median participant satisfaction score was 7.5 out of 10 (range, 2-10).ConclusionMost participants used this mobile application for patient education and self-monitoring after elective Cesarean delivery. Insights into patient engagement with C-Care after Cesarean delivery could help design more effective perioperative mobile telehealth programs.Trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03746678); registered 5 November 2018.

Project description:BackgroundAnxiety may adversely impact mother and her newborn. Music listening is a safe and efficacious treatment that may to reduce perioperative anxiety. The effect on acute pain and pain catastrophizing scores remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether perioperative music listening reduces anxiety, acute pain, and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) scores following elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.MethodsAfter randomization into music listening and control groups, baseline patient characteristics, visual analog scale-anxiety (VAS-A) scores, pain scores, PCS total and sub-scores, and music preferences were collected preoperatively. Before surgery, parturients in the experimental group listened to music of their own choice for 30 min. Music listening was continued during administration of spinal anesthesia and cesarean delivery, and for 30 min following surgery. Postoperative VAS-A score, acute pain score, PCS scores, music preferences, satisfaction score, and feedback were recorded.ResultsWe analyzed 108 parturients (music: n = 53; control: n = 55). Music listening was associated with reduced postoperative VAS-A (mean difference (MD) -1.43, 95%CI -0.63 to -2.22), PCS total score (MD -6.39, 95%CI -2.11 to -10.66), PCS sub-scores on rumination (MD -1.68, 95%CI -0.12 to -3.25), magnification (MD -1.53, 95%CI -0.45 to -2.62), and helplessness (MD -3.17, 95%CI -1.29 to -5.06) sub-scores. There was no significant difference in postoperative acute pain scores. The majority (> 95%) of parturients reported "excellent" and "good" satisfaction with music listening, and most provided positive feedback.ConclusionPerioperative music listening was associated with reduced postoperative anxiety and lower pain catastrophizing. Based on the good patient satisfaction and positive feedback received, the use of music listening in the obstetric setting is recommended.Trial registrationThis study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03415620 on 30/01/2018.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Spinal anesthesia is a form of regional anesthesia frequently used in various lower abdominal, orthopedic, obstetric operations such as a cesarean delivery. The most common local anesthetic used for spinal anesthesia in obstetric and non-obstetric surgery is bupivacaine which can be utilized as an isobaric or hyperbaric solution, producing differences in maternal hemodynamic changes. Against this backdrop, the study aims to compare the effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamic alterations after administering spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS:A hospital-based prospective cohort study design was employed for the period December 1, 2017 to January 30, 2018. A total of 100 parturient were involved, with one group exposed to isobaric bupivacaine and the other to hyperbaric bupivacaine to observe their effects on maternal hemodynamic changes post spinal anesthesia. The participants were selected through systematic random sampling. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 20) through descriptive statistic, independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test were used. P values of <0.05 was assumed as statistically significant for all tests. RESULTS:The incidence of hypotension was found to be greater in isobaric than hyperbaric groups (82% vs. 60% respectively; p = 0.015). No statistical significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure value at baseline, but, statistically significant changes were observed among the groups (p <0.05) at all study timing after spinal anesthesia, except at 30thmin. No statistically significant differences were seen in the mean heart rate variability after spinal anesthesia at all periods, except the 15th minute (p = 0.033). A greater rate of vasopressor was used in the isobaric group as compared to the hyperbaric group (36% vs. 14% respectively; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION:Baricity is a significant factor in maternal hemodynamic changes in the parturient for elective cesarean section. Isobaric bupivacaine produces greater change in blood pressure and incidence of hypotension and entails a greater vasopressor requirement than hyperbaric bupivacaine after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.

Project description:BackgroundNeonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe.MethodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores.ResultsFour hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5-10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6-23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42).ConclusionsWhen providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible.Trial registrationThe clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157.

Project description:Background Maternal hypotension is a common problem during spinal anesthesia resulting in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. According to theoretical knowledge, it is more common in severe preeclamptic parturients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Objective To compare fetomother outcome in normotensive and severe preeclamptic parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methodology A prospective cohort study was conducted from Novembers to May 30, 2019 on 84 ASA II and III pregnant mothers. After preloading with 500 ml–1000ml crystalloids, a 0.5%isobaric bupivacaine of 10 mg–12.5 mg was administered for spinal anesthesia. Vital signs (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) were recorded every 3 min till 30 min, every 5 min then after. Neonatal Apgar scores at one and 5 min after birth and intraoperative fluids consumption were recorded. Data distribution was checked by Shapiro walk's test. Chi-square test was used to calculate the incidence of hypotension between groups; both paired and unpaired t-tests were also used to calculate the percent fall in blood pressure and heart rate from baselines of each group and intergroup respectively, and P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistical significance. Results The incidence of hypotension (over a period of 30 min after spinal anesthesia) in the preeclamptic patients (31%) was less than that of the healthy parturients (59.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in heart rate of both groups before and after induction of spinal anesthesia. The 5th minute Apgar score recordings were also comparable between the groups. Conclusion This study showed that the incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was less in severely preeclamptic parturient than healthy parturient who underwent elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia and fetal outcome was comparable. Highlights • Peak sensory block level was similar in both groups and no patients complained intraoperative pain and analgesics were not required supplemental.• Base line SBP, DBP and MAP were significantly higher in severe preeclamptic group (p = 0.01).• Mean gestational age of the fetus was significantly low in severe preeclamptic group (p = 0.01).• Apgar score at 1st min(7–8 vs,8–9),volume of intra operative fluid use were statistically significant with p < 0.05