Dataset Information

The role of brain natriuretic peptide in atrial fibrillation: a substudy of the Substrate Modification with Aggressive Blood Pressure Control for Atrial Fibrillation (SMAC-AF) trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Catheter ablation is an established therapy for atrial fibrillation but is limited by recurrence; efforts have been made to identify biomarkers that predict recurrence. We investigated the effect of baseline NT-proBNP on AF recurrence following catheter ablation in patients randomized to aggressive (< 120/80 mmHg) or standard blood pressure management (< 140/90 mmHg) in the Substrate Modification with Aggressive Blood Pressure Control trial (SMAC-AF).

Methods

The SMAC-AF study included 173 patients resistant or intolerant to at least one class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. We studied the effect of baseline NT-proBNP on the primary outcome of AF recurrence > 3 months post-ablation.

Results

Of the 173 patients, 88 were randomized to the aggressive cohort, and 85 into the standard group. The primary outcome occurred in 61.4% of those in the aggressive arm, versus 61.2% in the standard arm. In the aggressive group, logNT-proBNP predicted recurrence (HR 1.28, p = 0.04, adjusted HR 1.43, p = 0.03), while in the standard cohort, it did not (HR 0.94, p = 0.62, adjusted HR 0.83, p = 0.22). NT-proBNP ≥ 280 pg/mL also predicted occurrence in the aggressive (HR 1.98, p = 0.02) but not the standard cohort (HR 1.00, p = 1.00).

Conclusion

We conclude that pre-ablation NT-proBNP may be useful in predicting recurrence in hypertensive patients and identifying patients who benefit from aggressive blood control and upstream therapies.

Trial registration

NCT00438113, registered February 21, 2007.

SUBMITTER: Weng W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8447763 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk for thromboembolism and death; however, the relationships between cardiac structure and function and adverse outcomes among individuals with AF are incompletely understood.MethodsThe Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in AF-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 study tested the once-daily oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban in comparison with warfarin for the prevention of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or systemic embolism in 21,105 subjects with nonvalvular AF and increased risk for thromboembolic events (CHADS2 score ≥ 2). In a prospective substudy of 971 subjects who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at baseline, Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between cardiac structure and function and the risks for death and thromboembolism (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism).ResultsOver a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, 89 deaths (9.2%) and 48 incident thromboembolic events (4.9%) occurred in 971 subjects. In models adjusted for CHADS2 score, aspirin use, and randomized treatment, larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume index (hazard ratio per 1 SD [12.9 mL/m(2)], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16-1.91) and higher LV filling pressures measured by E/e' ratio (hazard ratio per 1 SD [4.6], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.61) were independently associated with increased risks for death. E/e' ratio > 13 significantly improved the prediction of death beyond clinical factors alone. No features of cardiac structure and function were independently associated with thromboembolism in this population. Findings were similar when adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc score in place of CHADS2 score.ConclusionsIn a contemporary population of patients with AF at increased risk for thromboembolic events, larger LV size and higher filling pressures were significantly associated with increased risk for death, but neither left atrial nor LV measures were associated with thromboembolic risk. LV size and filling pressures may help identify patients with AF at increased risk for death.

Project description:AimsThis multicentre, randomized trial compared three strategies of AF ablation: ablation of complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) alone, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, and combined PVI + CFE ablation, using standardized automated mapping software.Methods and resultsPatients with drug-refractory, high-burden paroxysmal (episodes >6 h, >4 in 6 months) or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at eight centres. Patients (n = 100) were randomized to one of three arms. For CFE alone (n = 34), spontaneous/induced AF was mapped using validated, automated CFE software and all sites <120 ms were ablated until AF termination/non-inducibility. For PVI (n = 32), all four PV antra were isolated and confirmed using a circular catheter. For PVI + CFE (n = 34), all four PV antra were isolated, followed by AF induction and ablation of all CFE sites until AF termination/non-inducibility. Patients were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months with a visit, ECG, 48 h Holter. Atrial fibrillation symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. Repeat procedures were allowed within the first 6 months. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF >30 s at 1 year. Patients (age 57 +/- 10 years, LA size 42 +/- 6 mm) were 35% persistent AF. In CFE, ablation terminated AF in 68%. Only 0.4 PVs per patient were isolated as a result of CFE. In PVI, 94% had all four PVs successfully isolated. In PVI + CFE, 94% had all four PVs isolated, 76% had inducible AF with additional CFE ablation, with 73% termination of AF. There were significantly more repeat procedures in the CFE arm (47%) vs. PVI (31%) or PVI + CFE (15%) (P = 0.01). After one procedure, PVI + CFE had a significantly higher freedom from AF (74%) compared with PVI (48%) and CFE (29%) (P = 0.004). After two procedures, PVI + CFE still had the highest success (88%) compared with PVI (68%) and CFE (38%) (P = 0.001). Ninety-six percent of these patients were off anti-arrhythmics. Complications were two tamponades, no PV stenosis, and no mortality.ConclusionIn high-burden paroxysmal/persistent AF, PVI + CFE has the highest freedom from AF vs. PVI or CFE alone after one or two procedures. Complex fractionated electrogram alone has the lowest one and two procedure success rates with a higher incidence of repeat procedures. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number NCT00367757.