The efficacy and safety of infliximab and calcineurin inhibitors in steroid-refractory UC patients: A meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Infliximab (IFX) and calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine [CYS] and tacrolimus [TAC]) were considered as rescue therapy in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of our study was to perform a meta-analysis evaluating the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of IFX and calcineurin inhibitors in steroid-refractory UC.Methods
We systematically searched the databases from inception to September 2020 that evaluated IFX, CYS, and TAC in steroid-refractory UC. The primary outcome was the response rates, remission rates, mucosal healing rates, and colectomy rates after therapy initiation. The secondary outcomes were the rates of adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), and mortality. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Results
Nineteen studies comprising 1323 Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among the non-randomized studies, a significantly higher therapeutic response rate was seen with IFX treatment, with a pooled OR of 3.15 (95% CI 2.26-4.40). Among non-randomized studies, IFX was associated with a significantly lower first-year OR (0.46 [95% CI 0.27-0.79]), second-year (OR 0.53 [95% CI 0.28-0.97]), third-year (OR 0.43 [95% CI 0.24-0.75]) colectomy rate. But the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not suggest any difference between IFX and CYS as rescue therapies for steroid-refractory UC. There were no significant differences among IFX, CYS, and TAC in the rates of AE, SAE, or mortality.Conclusion
Our meta-analysis suggested a better treatment response rate and lower risk of colectomy in the first, second and third year, with IFX, compared with CYS in steroid-refractory UC patients. There was no significant difference among IFX and calcineurin inhibitors in AE, SAE, and mortality.
SUBMITTER: Zhao HN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8448007 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: Although infliximab has been recommended for the second-line treatment of seronegative spondyloarthropathy- or juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related uveitis, the issue of its systemic efficacy and safety in a broader diversity of refractory noninfectious uveitis is debatable. To assess the short-term and relatively long-term efficacy of infliximab in refractory noninfectious uveitis, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Wanfang Med Online were systematically searched from January 2005 to March 2020. Two investigators independently assessed eligibility. Data were independently collected by two investigators. The pooled proportions were estimated with patients for intraocular inflammation control and improvement of visual acuity. Pooled proportions with 95% credible intervals were computed. Study homogeneity was investigated using I 2 statistics to quantify the percentage of variation across studies. To pool the results, the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects or random-effects models were used. Results: Of 2316 studies identified, 16 unique studies with 509 unique participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportions of intraocular inflammation control reached 92% (95% CI: 87%-98%; I 2: 1%; p=0.42) and 95% (95% CI: 93%-97%; I 2: 0%; p=0.91) in groups of ≤6- and ≥12-month follow-up durations. During the relatively long follow-up period, the pooled proportions of maintaining visual acuity stable or increasing at least one line reached 99% (95% CI: 96%-100%; I 2: 0%; p=0.54) in the involved eyes. The corticosteroid-sparing effect of infliximab was also well demonstrated, with the proportion of corticosteroid-sparing success reaching 85.5% (112/131). Besides, about serious adverse events, 2.6% (13/500) of patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions, 2.4% (12/500) of patients experienced serious infections, 1.8% (9/500) of patients experienced autoimmune diseases, and 0.6% (3/500) of patients experienced neoplasia. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provided evidence that infliximab might be a promising choice in controlling inflammatory activity, gaining visual acuity, and sparing corticosteroid use with relatively few side effects when applied in treating refractory noninfectious uveitis. Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier [registration number].
| S-EPMC8481770 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) colitis is an increasingly common problem encountered as the use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) grows in the management of cancers. Corticosteroids and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors are widely recommended in the management of ICI colitis; however, the experience is limited when patients are refractory. Different authors have reported success with vedolizumab, mycophenolate, and cyclosporine. This case series describes our experience with calcineurin inhibitors in the management of corticosteroid and anti-TNF-alpha refractory ICI colitis.MethodsData from electronic medical records were identified and reviewed retrospectively from a cohort of patients treated at a single oncology center. All patients who were identified between March 2018 and May 2020 with ICI colitis refractory to treatment with infliximab and corticosteroids were included.ResultsThere were 11 patients who developed ICI colitis after receiving CPIs for advanced melanoma and required rescue therapy with either cyclosporine or tacrolimus after treatment failure of infliximab. Median age was 53 (±8.48) years, with nine patients (81%) receiving combination Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) / programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy. Median time after first CPI infusion to ICI colitis was 4.43 (±19.53) weeks. The median time from onset of symptoms to commencement of rescue therapy with calcineurin inhibitors was 70 days (±66.06). Eight of the 11 patients (72.7%) responded to calcineurin inhibition. In patients who responded, calcineurin inhibitors were continued for a median of 54 (±28.96) days.ConclusionThe calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus appear to be a safe and effective option for the management of patients with infliximab-refractory ICI colitis. The therapeutic benefit is observed rapidly, and adverse effects appear to be limited with close monitoring.
| S-EPMC8114988 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40–0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10–0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45–0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31–0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I–IV) and severe (grades III–IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%–90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0–100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%–44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0–27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%–75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%–100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%–90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%–82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment.
| S-EPMC9386528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMany patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) are treated with infliximab (IFX). As most of these patients experience a long-lasting therapy, the outcome and withdrawal of IFX treatment are important clinical questions.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed the treatment outcome in moderate to severe CD patients with a steroid-dependent/refractory disease course started on IFX. Withdrawal of IFX was evaluated in patients with deep remission defined as clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4), biochemical (fecal calprotectin [FC] ≤150 μg/g stool) over a period of 2 years, and endoscopic and histological remission before discontinuation of IFX.ResultsAfter induction with IFX, clinical remission was observed in 45/109 patients (41.3%) and clinical response in 61/109 patients (56.0%). Only 8/109 patients (7.3%) achieved deep remission and therefore could be discontinued from IFX therapy. In 4 of these patients (50%), relapse was observed after discontinuation of IFX treatment. FC decreased in these 8 patients in deep remission from 652 ± 168 μg/g stool (mean ± SE) at baseline to 24.9 ± 8.1 μg/g stool at 14 weeks. When compared to patients in deep remission, FC had decreased significantly less at 14 weeks in patients in clinical remission after induction with IFX (n = 31; 154 ± 55 μg/g stool; p = 0.01), in patients with clinical response after induction achieving clinical remission during the maintenance phase (n = 11; 352 ± 67 μg/g stool; p = 0.004), or in patients with chronic active disease course on maintenance therapy (n = 50; 645 ± 93 μg/g stool; p < 0.001).ConclusionA low discontinuation rate was observed for steroid-dependent/refractory moderate to severe CD patients with IFX treatment. As FC showed a more or less pronounced decrease depending on the response to the IFX treatment, monitoring of FC may become a noninvasive tool for tailoring biological therapy in CD patients.
| S-EPMC5988174 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: In steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), cyclosporine (CYS) or infliximab (IFX) may be considered as a second-line alternative to avoid colectomy. There are short-term data reported, but until now, there is no meta-analysis regarding long-term outcomes of CYS and IFX in patients with ASUC. Aim: To compare long-term efficacy and safety of CYS and IFX in a meta-analysis. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for studies which compared CYS vs. IFX in adults with ASUC. Long-term colectomy-free rate from 1 to 10 years during CYS or IFX therapy was collected, last updated up to 22nd May 2019. Primary outcome was long-term colectomy-free rate, secondary outcomes were adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), and mortality. Long-term colectomy-free survival and safety measures were pooled with the random-effect model. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Data from 1,607 patients in 15 trials were extracted. In the first 3 years, pooled OR for colectomy-free survival was higher with IFX than with CYS (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11-2.29, p = 0.012; OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.14-2.18, p = 0.006; and OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.08-2.84, p = 0.024; at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). However, the significant difference remained undetected from the fourth year of follow-up and in subgroup of RCTs (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.90-2.01, p = 0.143; OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.94-2.12, p = 0.096; and OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.89-2.00, p = 0.157; at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). No significant difference was detected regarding adverse events, serious adverse events and mortality between the groups. The neutral associations proved to be underpowered with trial sequential analysis. Conclusion: However observational studies show IFX as a better choice, according to the RCTs, choosing either CYS or IFX as rescue therapy for ASUC, the long-term outcomes are not different, although further large RCTs are warranted.
| S-EPMC6985460 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCalcineurin inhibitors, novel topical immunomodulators, may constitute a superior alternative for glucocorticosteroids in atopic dermatitis (AD) topical treatment.AimDetermination of efficacy and safety of each topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) formulation, 0.3% or 0.1% tacrolimus and 1% pimecrolimus, for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in comparison with glucocorticosteroids.Material and methodsCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, GREAT database, trials registers and reference lists were searched up to February 2018. Randomised controlled trials of TCI, compared to corticosteroids (TCS), reporting efficacy or safety outcomes were selected. Quality of trials and evidence of each outcome were evaluated according to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and tools. The primary outcomes were physician's global assessment of improvement and occurrence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsFourteen trials involving 7376 children and adults with AD were included. Calcineurin inhibitors were significantly more effective than various potency TCS, neither least potent to lower mid-strength nor mid-strength to potent TCS (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44). The major AEs were skin burning and pruritus, their incidence was higher in TCI treatment (RR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.90-3.80; RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).ConclusionsCalcineurin inhibitors seem to be more effective and contrarily they elicit more AEs than TCS.
| S-EPMC6986278 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe objective was to describe the prevalence, types, and predictors of adverse events (AEs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab and methotrexate in a daily clinical setting.MethodsThis was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, 74-week observational study in patients with active RA despite treatment with methotrexate and at least one other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Patients were treated with 3 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks. At weeks 0, 6, 26, 50, and 74, patients answered a health assessment questionnaire, a swollen joint count was made, and adverse events (AEs) occurring during the previous period were registered.ResultsFive hundred and seventy-five patients were treated with infliximab, of which 346 were still on infliximab at the study end, 158 discontinued treatment, and 71 were lost to follow-up. Reasons for discontinuation included safety (n=74), elective reasons (n=43), and inefficacy (n=41). Infusion reactions (n=33) and infections (n=20) were the most common AEs causing discontinuation and the most common AEs overall. There were four cases of tuberculosis, all of which occurred in patients negative at screening. Total AEs, serious AEs, and infusion reactions as well as discontinuations for AEs were most frequent during the first 26 weeks. Higher age was a predictor of serious adverse events (SAEs), infection, and discontinuation due to an SAE, but odds ratios were close to one.ConclusionsAEs and discontinuations due to AEs occur most frequently during the first half year of infliximab treatment in refractory RA patients. The main reasons for discontinuing treatment are infections and infusion reactions. Tuberculosis and other infections remain an important concern in these patients.
| S-EPMC2911915 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gastrointestinal (GI) tract graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major cause of post-allo-HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) morbidity and mortality. Patients with steroid-refractory GI-GvHD have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. FMT2017002 trial (#NCT03148743) was a non-randomized, open-label, phase I/II clinical study of FMT for treating patients with grade IV steroid-refractory GI-GvHD. A total of 55 patients with steroid-refractory GI-GvHD were enrolled in this study. Forty-one patients with grade IV steroid-refractory GI-GvHD were included in the final statistical analysis. Of them, 23 patients and 18 patients were assigned to the FMT group and the control group, respectively. On days 14 and 21 after FMT, clinical remission was significantly greater in the FMT group than in the control group. Within a follow-up period of 90 days, the FMT group showed a better overall survival (OS). At the end of the study, the median survival time was >539 days in the FMT group and 107 days in the control group (HR=3.51; 95% CI, 1.21-10.17; p=0.021). Both the event-free survival time (EFS) (HR=2.3, 95% CI, 0.99-5.4; p=0.08) and OS (HR=4.4, 95% CI, 1.5-13.04; p=0.008) were higher in the FMT group during the follow-up period. Overall, the mortality rate was lower in the FMT group (HR=3.97; 95% CI, 1.34-11.75; p=0.013). No differences in the occurrence of any other side effects were observed. Our data suggest that the diversity of the intestinal microbiota could be affected by allo-HSCT. Although its effectiveness and safety need further evaluation, FMT may serve as a therapeutic option for grade IV steroid-refractory GI-GvHD.Clinical trial registration[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03148743].
| S-EPMC8248496 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A gene expression profiling sub-study was conducted in which colonic biopsy samples were collected for RNA extraction and hybridization to microarrays from 48 patients with UC who were participating in ACT 1, a placebo-controlled study of infliximab. Gene expression profiles from infliximab responders were compared with those of baseline and infliximab non-responder samples. Infliximab had a significant effect on mRNA expression in treatment responders, with both infliximab dose and duration of treatment having an effect. Genes affected are primarily involved with inflammatory response, cell-mediated immune responses, and cell-to-cell signaling. Infliximab non-responders had a molecular phenotype that closely resembled that of untreated patients with UC. Unlike responders, non-responders do not effectively modulate TH1, TH2, and TH17 pathways. Gene expression can differentiate placebo and infliximab responders.
2011-07-22 | GSE23597 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundCrohn disease is an inflammatory bowel disease with intermittent symptoms relating to damage to the gastrointestinal tract. Compared with adult-onset Crohn disease, the childhood-onset form is more likely to be severe. Infliximab has shown efficacy in adult patients.ObjectiveTo examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab in pediatric Crohn disease, by means of a systematic review.Data sourcesThree databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and regulatory documents were searched from inception to December 2017. Clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and reference lists were searched to March 2018.Study selection and data extractionRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with active control were included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently performed screening, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of endoscopic remission and severe adverse effects.Data synthesisThree eligible RCTs comparing different dose regimens, 16 prospective cohort studies comparing infliximab with other therapies (adalimumab, exclusive enteral nutrition, or standard of care), and 3 prospective cohort studies comparing different infliximab regimens were identified. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed no significant difference between infliximab every 8 weeks compared with longer intervals for maintenance of clinical remission (risk ratio [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-3.19). Meta-analyses of the prospective cohort studies showed no significant differences between infliximab and adalimumab for maintenance of endoscopic remission (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60-1.92), between infliximab and exclusive enteral nutrition for induction of clinical remission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.45), or between infliximab and standard of care for maintenance of clinical remission at 6 and 12 months (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.17, and RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.84-1.84, respectively).ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggested comparable efficacy for infliximab and other therapies; however, the available literature was limited by risk of bias and small sample size. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this drug in pediatric Crohn disease.
| S-EPMC6592657 | biostudies-literature