Dataset Information

Outcomes of a telemedicine bowel management program during COVID-19.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we transitioned from an in-person bowel management program (BMP) to a telemedicine BMP. The telemedicine BMP consisted of video and/or phone call visits (remote) or a single initial in-person visit followed by remote visits (hybrid). We hypothesized that patient/family satisfaction of a telemedicine BMP would be comparable to an in-person BMP and that there would be improvement in quality of life and functional outcomes after the telemedicine BMP.

Methods

After IRB approval, demographic and outcomes data were obtained for patients who underwent the telemedicine BMP from May-October 2020. Outcomes included a parent/patient satisfaction survey, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), and parent/patient-reported outcome measures (Vancouver, Baylor, and Cleveland scores) at baseline, 1 and 3 month follow-up. Variables were compared using Chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and a generalized mixed model was used to evaluate outcomes scores at follow-up compared to baseline.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were included in our analysis with an average age of 8.6 years (SD: 3.9). Patients had the following diagnoses anorectal malformation (52.2%), Hirschsprung's disease (20.9%), functional constipation (19.4%), myelomeningocele (6.0%), and spinal injury (1.5%). Forty-eight patients (72%) underwent the remote BMP and 19 (28%) underwent the hybrid BMP. Sixty-two percent of parents completed the satisfaction survey, with a median score of 5 (very satisfied) for all questions. Over 75% of parents said they would prefer a telemedicine program over an in-person program. There was significant improvement in the Baylor and Vancouver scores after the BMP (p < 0.01), but no difference in the PedsQL or Cleveland scores (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in stool continence after the BMP (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

A telemedicine BMP can be an acceptable alternative to a traditional in-person program. There was high parental/patient satisfaction and significant improvement in outcomes. Further research is needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Level of evidence

III.

SUBMITTER: Knaus ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8452355 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic forced numerous pain clinics to suspend their services. For chronic pain patients, even a temporary closure and inability to connect with their healthcare providers may result in adverse outcomes. There are serious concerns regarding worsening of physical and emotional suffering and a surge in substance abuse. Therefore, telemedicine, also called telehealth, would seem to be a reasonable alternative to in-person clinic visits during the lockdowns. However, it remains unclear whether a telemedicine consultation is adequate for diagnostic purposes and subsequent intervention planning. Methods This study was conducted as an open-label cohort study on new patients referred to an interdisciplinary community pain clinic focused on image-guided interventions. The primary outcome was to determine whether a video consultation was sufficient to make an initial diagnosis and plan subsequent interventions. Secondary variables included technical feasibility, patient satisfaction, calculated nonincurred cost and time-saving. Video consultations were performed using a secure videoconference system consistent with routine clinic practice. Results Sixty-five participants were recruited, and 49 (75.4%) completed the study. Patients for whom interventional approaches were not recommended elected not to continue with clinic visits. The intra-observer agreement rate between the telemedicine and in-person encounter was 93.9% (95% CI 87.2-100) for the diagnostic codes and treatment plan. The median satisfaction score from the telemedicine encounter was seven on a scale of 0–7, and it remained 6 when the remote care experience was later compared with the in-person visit. There were considerable savings in travel time and expenses. Discussion The study experimentally validated the ability of telemedicine encounters to establish a diagnosis and formulate an interventional pain management plan of care. The validity of virtual consultation for complex pain care remains to be determined. It is unreasonable to expect telemedicine to completely replace clinic visits in the foreseeable future. However, judicious use of technology may facilitate timely scheduling, save time and resources, and improve satisfaction without jeopardizing the quality of care.