Dataset Information

Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To compare block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) for the detection of in-transit metastasis (ITM) of malignant melanoma in digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 100 [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans of melanoma patients with ITM, performed between May 2017 and January 2020. PET images were reconstructed with both OSEM and BSREM algorithms. SUVmax, target-to-background ratio (TBR), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were recorded for each ITM. Differences in PET parameters were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Differences in image quality for different reconstructions were tested using the Man-Whitney U test.

Results

BSREM reconstruction led to the detection of 287 ITM (39% more than OSEM). PET parameters of ITM were significantly different between BSREM and OSEM reconstructions (p < 0.001). SUVmax and TBR were higher (76.5% and 77.7%, respectively) and MTV lower (49.5%) on BSREM. ITM missed with OSEM had significantly lower SUVmax (mean 2.03 vs. 3.84) and TBR (mean 1.18 vs. 2.22) and higher MTV (mean 2.92 vs. 1.01) on OSEM compared to BSREM (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

BSREM detects significantly more ITM than OSEM, owing to higher SUVmax, higher TBR, and less blurring. BSREM is particularly helpful in small and less avid lesions, which are more often missed with OSEM.

Key points

• In melanoma patients, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT helps to detect in-transit metastases (ITM), and their detection is improved by using BSREM instead of OSEM reconstruction. • BSREM is particularly useful in small lesions.

SUBMITTER: Liberini V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8452544 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases (LM); however, some sub-centimeter lesions may be missed. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has a high sensitivity and may play a synergistic role with MRI in diagnosing spinal LM (SLM). We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the detection of SLM with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) compared to that of whole spinal cord MRI in a single center.MethodsPatients with SLM who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI were enrolled. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging findings were independently reviewed by 2 nuclear medicine physicians. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of SLMs were described. A consistency test was conducted to assess the patient-based diagnostic results obtained by the 2 physicians. Patient-based sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity in diagnosing SLM between 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the whole spinal cord were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to assess the diagnostic performance of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to diagnose SLM.ResultsA total of 16 patients with SLM were included in this study from October 2010 to April 2022. The primary tumor involved the lungs, liver, ovaries, prostate, esophagus, and unknown primary site. The mean age of patients, including 13 males and 3 females, was 57.8±11.2 (range, 34-73) years. Of 16 patients with SLM, 10 had nodular diseases, 2 had linear diseases, and 4 had mixed diseases. The kappa value of the consistency test of the 2 radiologists' diagnostic results was 0.765. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing SLM were 87.5%, 89.2%, and 88.7%, respectively and those of whole spinal cord MRI were 75.0%, 100.0%, and 92.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the 2 methods, with P values of 0.654, 0.115, and 0.506, respectively. However, more nodular diseases were observed on PET/CT. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction of SLM by SUVmax was 0.907 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.831-0.983]. When SUVmax ≥2.45, the Youden index was the largest, and the sensitivity and specificity were 89.3% and 75.7%, respectively.Conclusions18F-FDG PET/CT is a good choice of imaging modality for assessing SLM. In the diagnosis of SLMs, PET/CT and enhanced MRI can play a better synergistic role.

Project description:Knowledge of the within-subject variability of 18F-FDG PET/MRI measurements is necessary for proper interpretation of quantitative PET or MRI metrics in the context of therapeutic efficacy assessments with integrated PET/MRI scanners. The goal of this study was to determine the test-retest repeatability of these metrics on PET/MRI, with comparison to similar metrics acquired by PET/CT. Methods: This prospective study enrolled subjects with pathology-proven pelvic malignancies. Baseline imaging consisted of PET/CT immediately followed by PET/MRI, using a single 370-MBq 18F-FDG dose. Repeat imaging was performed within 7 d using an identical imaging protocol, with no oncologic therapy between sessions. PET imaging on both scanners consisted of a list-mode acquisition at a single pelvic station. The MRI consisted of 2-point Dixon imaging for attenuation correction, standard sequences for anatomic correlation, and diffusion-weighted imaging. PET data were statically reconstructed using various frame durations and minimizing uptake time differences between sessions. SUV metrics were extracted for both PET/CT and PET/MRI in each imaging session. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics were extracted for both PET/MRI sessions. Results: The study cohort consisted of 14 subjects (13 female, 1 male) with various pelvic cancers (11 cervical, 2 rectal, 1 endometrial). For SUVmax, the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) appeared higher for PET/CT (8.5%-12.8%) than PET/MRI (6.6%-8.7%) across all PET reconstructions, though with no significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.08) between modalities. For lean body mass-adjusted SUVpeak, the wCVs appeared similar for PET/CT (9.9%-11.5%) and PET/MRI (9.2%-11.3%) across all PET reconstructions, again with no significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.14) between modalities. For PET/MRI, the wCV for ADCmedian of 3.5% appeared lower than the wCVs for SUVmax (6.6%-8.7%) and SULpeak (9.2%-11.3%), though without significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.23). Conclusion: For solid tumors of the pelvis, the repeatability of the evaluated SUV and ADC metrics on 18F-FDG PET/MRI is both acceptably high and similar to previously published values for 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, supporting the use of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for quantitative oncologic treatment response assessments.

Project description:BackgroundWe assessed and compared image quality obtained with clinical 18F-FDG whole-body oncologic PET protocols used in three different, state-of-the-art digital PET/CT and two conventional PMT-based PET/CT devices. Our goal was to evaluate an improved trade-off between administered activity (patient dose exposure/signal-to-noise ratio) and acquisition time (patient comfort) while preserving diagnostic information achievable with the recently introduced digital detector technology compared to previous analogue PET technology.MethodsWe performed list-mode (LM) PET acquisitions using a NEMA/IEC NU2 phantom, with activity concentrations of 5?kBq/mL and 25?kBq/mL for the background (9.5?L) and sphere inserts, respectively. For each device, reconstructions were obtained varying the image statistics (10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 300?s from LM data) and the number of iterations (range 1 to 10) in addition to the employed local clinical protocol setup. We measured for each reconstructed dataset: the quantitative cross-calibration, the image noise on the uniform background assessed by the coefficient of variation (COV), and the recovery coefficients (RCs) evaluated in the hot spheres. Additionally, we compared the characteristic time-activity-product (TAP) that is the product of scan time per bed position × mass-activity administered (in min·MBq/kg) across datasets.ResultsGood system cross-calibration was obtained for all tested datasets with <?6% deviation from the expected value was observed. For all clinical protocol settings, image noise was compatible with clinical interpretation (COV?<?15%). Digital PET showed an improved background signal-to-noise ratio as compared to conventional PMT-based PET. RCs were comparable between digital and PMT-based PET datasets. Compared to PMT-based PET, digital systems provided comparable image quality with lower TAP (from ~?40% less and up to 70% less).ConclusionsThis study compared the achievable clinical image quality in three state-of-the-art digital PET/CT devices (from different vendors) as well as in two conventional PMT-based PET. Reported results show that a comparable image quality is achievable with a TAP reduction of ~?40% in digital PET. This could lead to a significant reduction of the administered mass-activity and/or scan time with direct benefits in terms of dose exposure and patient comfort.

Project description:PurposeWe investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based denoising halves PET acquisition time in digital PET/CT.MethodsOne hundred ninety-five patients referred for [18F]FDG PET/CT were prospectively included. Body PET acquisitions were performed in list mode. Original "PET90" (90 s/bed position) was compared to reconstructed ½-duration PET (45 s/bed position) with and without AI-denoising, "PET45AI and PET45". Denoising was performed by SubtlePET™ using deep convolutional neural networks. Visual global image quality (IQ) 3-point scores and lesion detectability were evaluated. Lesion maximal and peak standardized uptake values using lean body mass (SULmax and SULpeak), metabolic volumes (MV), and liver SULmean were measured, including both standard and EARL1 (European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd) compliant SUL. Lesion-to-liver SUL ratios (LLR) and liver coefficients of variation (CVliv) were calculated.ResultsPET45 showed mediocre IQ (scored poor in 8% and moderate in 68%) and lesion concordance rate with PET90 (88.7%). In PET45AI, IQ scores were similar to PET90 (P = 0.80), good in 92% and moderate in 8% for both. The lesion concordance rate between PET90 and PET45AI was 836/856 (97.7%), with 7 lesions (0.8%) only detected in PET90 and 13 (1.5%) exclusively in PET45AI. Lesion EARL1 SULpeak was not significantly different between both PET (P = 0.09). Lesion standard SULpeak, standard and EARL1 SULmax, LLR and CVliv were lower in PET45AI than in PET90 (P < 0.0001), while lesion MV and liver SULmean were higher (P < 0.0001). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between PET90 and PET45AI were observed for lesion SUL and MV (ICC ≥ 0.97) and for liver SULmean (ICC ≥ 0.87).ConclusionAI allows [18F]FDG PET duration in digital PET/CT to be halved, while restoring degraded ½-duration PET image quality. Future multicentric studies, including other PET radiopharmaceuticals, are warranted.

Dataset Information

Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key points

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Key points

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT.