Dataset Information

Chemoradiotherapy Is Superior to Radiotherapy Alone in Esophageal Cancer Patients Older Than 65 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the SEER Database.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) is the main treatment for unoperated esophageal cancer (EC) patients. It is controversial whether adding chemotherapy (CT) to RT is beneficial for elderly EC patients. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with RT alone for non-surgical elderly esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 7,101 eligible EC patients older than 65 years diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All the samples were divided into the radiotherapy group and the chemoradiotherapy group. After being matched by propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio, 3,020 patients were included in our analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were applied to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

After PSM, the clinical characteristics of patients between the RT and CRT groups were comparable. For EC patients older than 65 years, the 3-year OS and CSS in the CRT group were 21.8% and 27.4%, and the 5-year OS and CSS in the CRT group were 12.7% and 19.8%, respectively. The 3-year OS and CSS in the RT group were 6.4% and 10.4%, and the 5-year OS and CSS in the RT group were 3.5% and 7.2%, respectively. Next, these patients were divided into five subgroups based on the age stratification (ages 65-69; 70-74; 75-79; 80-84; ≥85). In each subgroup analysis, the 3- and 5-year OS and CSS showed significant benefits in the CRT group rather than in the RT group (all p < 0.05). We were unable to assess toxicities between the two groups due to a lack of correlated information.

Conclusions

CRT could improve OS and CSS for non-surgical EC patients older than 65 years. Adding chemotherapy to radiation showed a significant prognostic advantage for elderly esophageal cancer patients.

SUBMITTER: Xia X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8453162 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether young patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) had distinct metastasis patterns and survival outcomes from older patients remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to explore the metastasis patterns and prognostic factors in young patients and evaluate the survival outcome in comparison to their older counterparts.Materials and methodsWe identified patients with metastatic GC in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. The patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: younger (≤40 years old) and older (>40 years old). We employed the chi-squared test to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between the two age groups. Furthermore, we conducted survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. To balance disparities in baseline characteristics, we employed propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsWe identified 5,580 metastatic GC patients from the SEER database, with 237 (4.2%) classified as younger and 5343 (95.8%) as older patients. A total of 237 pairs of patients were generated after adjustment by PSM. Patients in the younger group exhibited a higher proportion of bone-only metastases and a lower proportion of liver-only metastases compared with patients in the older group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that youth was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) before and after PSM, but not for gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS). Among the younger group, patients with liver-only metastasis demonstrated the best prognosis, whereas patients with lung-only metastasis exhibited significantly worse survival outcomes compared with liver-only metastases, even comparable to that of bone metastasis.ConclusionsCompared with the older group, the metastatic GC patients in the younger group exhibited more aggressive tumors but better prognoses. The metastasis pattern and its effect on the prognosis of GC varied by age group.