Dataset Information

Thoracic Reciprocal Change Can Be Predicted Before Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity.

ABSTRACT:

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Objective

Analysis of postoperative sagittal alignment of the unfused spine is lacking in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the whole spine full-flexion lateral radiograph to predict the reciprocal change of the unfused spine after correction surgery. We hypothesized that the novel parameter (T1-UIV angle: angle between the upper vertebral endplate of the T1 and the upper vertebral endplate of the upper instrumented vertebra) of the preoperative whole spine full-flexion lateral radiograph is similar to that of the postoperative lateral radiograph if the patient has the ideal sagittal alignment.

Methods

Twenty-six ASD patients who underwent correction surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up were enrolled and separated into the Ideal and Non-Ideal groups according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification of the final follow-up radiograph. Radiographic parameters, including T1-UIV of the preoperative whole spine full-flexion lateral radiograph, were obtained.

Results

Thirteen patients were included in the Ideal group and 13 were in Non-Ideal group. Preoperative T1-UIV of the whole spine full-flexion lateral radiograph exhibited significant correlations with the T1-UIV angles of the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs (r = 0.64, P < .01, y = 0.800x + 8.012, and r = 0.69, P < .01, y = 0.857x + 2.960, respectively). Interestingly, this correlation was stronger for the Ideal group (r = 0.77, P < .01, y = 1.207x - 1.517, and r = 0.89, P < .01, y = 0.986x + 0.694, respectively).

Conclusion

A novel radiographic strategy (T1-UIV of preoperative the whole spine full-flexion lateral radiograph) could estimate the postoperative alignment of the unfused spine correctly.

SUBMITTER: Ishikawa K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8453674 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Study designRetrospective database study.ObjectiveNavigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery.MethodsAdults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences.Results3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) (P <.001).In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related.ConclusionsDespite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.

Project description:BackgroundAdult spinal deformity patients (ASD) experience altered spinal alignment affecting spatiotemporal parameters and joint kinematics. Differences in spinal deformity between patients with symptomatic idiopathic scoliosis (ID-ASD) and patients with "de novo" scoliosis (DN-ASD) may affect gait characteristics differently. This study aims to compare gait characteristics between ID-ASD, DN-ASD, and asymptomatic healthy matched controls.MethodsIn this observational case-control study, ID-ASD (n = 24) and DN-ASD (n = 26) patients visiting the out-patient spine clinic and scheduled for long-segment spinal fusion were included. Patients were matched, based on age, gender, leg length and BMI, with asymptomatic healthy controls. Gait was measured at comfortable walking speed on an instrumented treadmill with 3D motion capture system. Trunk, pelvic and lower extremities range of motion (ROM) and spatiotemporal parameters (SPT) are presented as median (first and thirds quartile). Independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare ID-ASD, DN-ASD and controls. Statistical Parametric Mapping (independent t-test) was used to compare 3D joint kinematics.ResultsDN-ASD patients walk with increased anterior trunk tilt during the whole gait cycle compared with ID-ASD patients and controls. ID-ASD walk with decreased trunk lateroflexion compared with DN-ASD and controls. DN-ASD showed decreased pelvic obliquity and -rotation, increased knee flexion, and decreased ankle plantar flexion. ID-ASD and DN-ASD displayed decreased trunk, pelvic and lower extremity ROM compared with controls, but increased pelvic tilt ROM. ID-ASD patients walked with comparable SPT to controls, whereas DN-ASD patients walked significantly slower with corresponding changes in SPT and wider steps.ConclusionsDN-ASD patients exhibit distinct alterations in SPT and kinematic gait characteristics compared with ID-ASD and controls. These alterations seem to be predominantly influenced by sagittal spinal malalignment and kinematic findings in ASD patients should not be generalized as such, but always be interpreted with consideration for the nature of the ASD.