Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac-Hyaluronate Conjugate (Diclofenac Etalhyaluronate) for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Phase III Trial in Japan.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To confirm the efficacy and safety of intraarticular (IA) injection of diclofenac covalently linked to hyaluronic acid (diclofenac etalhyaluronate [DF-HA]; ONO-5704/SI-613) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

In a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible subjects ages 40-75 years with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence score of 2 or 3) were randomly assigned to receive IA injections of DF-HA 30 mg or placebo (citric acid-sodium citrate buffered solution; 1:1) once every 4 weeks for 20 weeks (a total of 6 injections). Subjects were followed up for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline to 12 weeks in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC) pain subscale scores, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale. Safety was evaluated by adverse event monitoring.

Results

All 440 subjects received investigational products (220 received placebo and 220 received DF-HA). The full analysis set and safety population comprised 438 subjects (220 in the placebo group and 218 in the DF-HA group) and 440 subjects, respectively. At 12 weeks, subjects receiving DF-HA showed significant improvement from baseline in the WOMAC pain subscale score (-23.2 mm) compared to subjects receiving placebo ( -17.1 mm), with a difference of -6.1 mm (95% confidence interval -9.4, -2.8; P < 0.001). The difference between groups was significant as early as week 1, and a difference was maintained for 24 weeks, although the difference at week 24 was not significant. Anaphylactic reactions were observed in 2 subjects receiving DF-HA.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that treatment with DF-HA results in significant improvement in the WOMAC pain subscale score compared to placebo over 12 weeks. Anaphylactic reactions were observed, and further safety evaluation is needed.

SUBMITTER: Nishida Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8456865 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeA pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate tanezumab efficacy and safety in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), including subgroup analyses of at-risk patients with diabetes, severe OA symptoms, and those aged ≥65 years.Patients and methodsData from phase III placebo-controlled clinical trials of patients with moderate-to-severe OA of the knee or hip were pooled to evaluate tanezumab efficacy (four trials) and safety (nine trials). Patients received intravenous tanezumab, tanezumab plus an oral NSAID (naproxen, celecoxib, or diclofenac), active comparator (naproxen, celecoxib, diclofenac, or oxycodone), or placebo. Efficacy assessments included change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores, Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA, and percentage of patients with ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥70%, and ≥90% improvement in WOMAC pain. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) documentation and physical and neurologic examinations.ResultsTanezumab significantly improved all efficacy end points in the overall population. Efficacy in at-risk patient subgroups was similar to the overall population. Incidence of AEs was highest in the tanezumab plus NSAID group and lowest in the placebo group. Incidence of AEs in the tanezumab monotherapy and active comparator groups was similar. Overall incidence of AEs was similar across subgroups. AEs of abnormal peripheral sensation were more frequently reported in tanezumab-treated patients compared with placebo or active comparator. Patients receiving active comparator had a slightly higher incidence of AEs suggestive of postganglionic sympathetic dysfunction.ConclusionTanezumab consistently provided significant improvement of pain, physical function, and PGA in individuals with OA, including patients with diabetes, severe OA symptoms, or aged ≥65 years. No increased safety risk was observed in at-risk patient subgroups.Trial registrationNCT00733902, NCT00744471, NCT00830063, NCT00863304, NCT00809354, NCT00864097, NCT00863772, NCT01089725, NCT00985621.