Dataset Information

Characterizing Sex Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although women with heart failure (HF) are potentially more likely to be physically frail compared with men with HF, the underlying contributors to this sex difference are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize sex differences in physical frailty phenotypes in HF.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled adults with class I-IV HF. Physical frailty was measured with the frailty phenotype criteria. Symptoms of dyspnea, sleep-related impairment, pain interference, depression, and anxiety were assessed. Body composition was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Simple comparative statistics and stepwise regression modeling were used.

Results

The average age of the sample (n=115) was 63.6±15.7 years, 49% were women, and 73% had nonischemic cause. Forty-three percent of the sample was physically frail. Women had a 4.6 times greater odds of being physically frail compared with men, adjusting for covariates (odds ratio=4.63 [95% CI, 1.81-11.84], P=0.001). Both physically frail men and women were characterized by more type 2 diabetes, higher comorbidity burden, and worse dyspnea symptoms. Physically frail women had significantly worse symptoms compared with non-physically frail women but no difference in body composition characteristics. Physically frail men had significantly lower appendicular muscle mass, higher percent fat, lower hemoglobin, and more depressive symptoms compared with non-physically frail men.

Conclusions

Women are significantly more likely to be physically frail compared with men in HF. Physical frailty in both women and men is characterized by comorbidities and worse symptoms; physical frailty in men is characterized by worse physiological characteristics.

SUBMITTER: Denfeld QE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8458254 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Characterizing Sex Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure.

Denfeld Quin E QE Habecker Beth A BA Camacho S Albert SA Roberts Davis Mary M Gupta Nandita N Hiatt Shirin O SO Medysky Mary E ME Purnell Jonathan Q JQ Winters-Stone Kerri K Lee Christopher S CS

Circulation. Heart failure 20210825 9

<h4>Background</h4>Although women with heart failure (HF) are potentially more likely to be physically frail compared with men with HF, the underlying contributors to this sex difference are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize sex differences in physical frailty phenotypes in HF.<h4>Methods</h4>We prospectively enrolled adults with class I-IV HF. Physical frailty was measured with the frailty phenotype criteria. Symptoms of dyspnea, sleep-related impairment, pain int ...[more]

PMID: 34428925

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The female preponderance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a distinguishing feature of this disorder, but the association of sex with degree of diastolic dysfunction and clinical outcomes among individuals with HFpEF remains unclear. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with HFpEF (PURSUIT-HFpEF [Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]: UMIN000021831). Between 2016 and 2019, 871 patients were enrolled from 26 hospitals (follow-up: 399±349 days). We investigated sex-related differences in diastolic dysfunction and postdischarge clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. The echocardiographic end point was diastolic dysfunction according to American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria. The clinical end point was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure readmission. Women accounted for 55.2% (481 patients) of the overall cohort. Compared with men, women were older and had lower prevalence rates of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. Women had diastolic dysfunction more frequently than men (52.8% versus 32.0%, P<0.001). The incidence of the clinical end point did not differ between women and men (women 36.1/100 person-years versus men 30.5/100 person-years, P=0.336). Female sex was independently associated with the echocardiographic end point (adjusted odds ratio, 2.839; 95% CI, 1.884-4.278; P<0.001) and the clinical end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.143-2.070; P=0.004). Conclusions Female sex was independently associated with the presence of diastolic dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients with HFpEF. Our results suggest that a sex-specific approach is key to investigating the pathophysiology of HFpEF. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831.

Dataset Information

Characterizing Sex Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Characterizing Sex Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets