Dataset Information

Postoperative Inflammatory Marker Surveillance in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The prognostic significance of inflammatory markers in solid cancers is well-established, albeit with considerable heterogeneity. This study sought to investigate the postoperative inflammatory marker trend in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), with a focus on colorectal PC (CPC), and to propose optimal surveillance periods and cutoffs.

Methods

Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database of PC patients treated at the authors' institution from April 2001 to March 2019. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were collected preoperatively and on postoperative days 0, 1 to 3, 4 to 7, 8 to 21, 22 to 56, and 57 to 90 as averages. Optimal surveillance periods and cutoffs for each marker were determined by maximally selected rank statistics. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the association of inflammatory markers with 1-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) using clinicopathologic parameters.

Results

The postoperative inflammatory marker trend and levels did not differ between the patients with and those without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Low postoperative LMR (days 4-7), high postoperative NLR (days 8-21), and high postoperative PLR (days 22-56) were optimal for prognosticating poor 1-year OS, whereas high postoperative PLR and NLR (days 57-90) and low postoperative LMR (days 8-21) were associated with poor 1-year RFS. A composite score of these three markers was prognostic for OS in CPC.

Conclusions

The reported cutoffs should be validated in a larger population of CPC patients. Future studies should account for the inflammatory response profile when selecting appropriate surveillance periods.

SUBMITTER: Thiagarajan S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8460570 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Pancreatic cancer is a catastrophic disease with high recurrence and death rates, even in early stages. Early detection and early treatment improve survival in many cancer types but have not yet been clearly documented to do so in pancreatic cancer. In this study, we assessed the benefit on survival resulting from different patterns of surveillance in daily practice after curative surgery of early pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had received curative surgery between January 2000 and December 2013 at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into one of four groups, based on surveillance strategy: the symptom group, the imaging group, the marker group (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and/or carcinoembryonic antigen), and the intense group (both imaging and tumor marker assessment). Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and post-recurrence overall survival (PROS) were evaluated. Results: One hundred and eighty-one patients with documented recurrence or metastasis were included in our analysis. The median OS for patients in the symptom group, imaging group, marker group, and intense group were 21.4 months, 13.9 months, 20.5 months, and 16.5 months, respectively (p = 0.670). Surveillance with imaging, tumor markers, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no significant difference in median RFS (symptom group, 11.7 months; imaging group, 6.3 months; marker group, 9.3 months; intense group, 6.9 months; p = 0.259) or median PROS (symptom group, 6.9 months; imaging group, 7.5 months; marker group, 5.0 months; intense group, 7.8 months; p = 0.953) between the four groups. Multivariate analyses identified poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (≥1), primary tumor site (tail), and tumor grade (poor differentiation) were poor prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Surveillance with regular imaging, tumor marker, or both was not an independent risk factor for OS of pancreatic cancer patients who undergo curative tumor resection.