Dataset Information

In silico Identification of Key Factors Driving the Response of Muscle Sensory Neurons to Noxious Stimuli.

ABSTRACT: Nociceptive nerve endings embedded in muscle tissue transduce peripheral noxious stimuli into an electrical signal [i.e., an action potential (AP)] to initiate pain sensations. A major contributor to nociception from the muscles is mechanosensation. However, due to the heterogeneity in the expression of proteins, such as ion channels, pumps, and exchangers, on muscle nociceptors, we currently do not know the relative contributions of different proteins and signaling molecules to the neuronal response due to mechanical stimuli. In this study, we employed an integrated approach combining a customized experimental study in mice with a computational model to identify key proteins that regulate mechanical nociception in muscles. First, using newly collected data from somatosensory recordings in mouse hindpaw muscles, we developed and then validated a computational model of a mechanosensitive mouse muscle nociceptor. Next, by performing global sensitivity analyses that simulated thousands of nociceptors, we identified three ion channels (among the 17 modeled transmembrane proteins and four endoplasmic reticulum proteins) as potential regulators of the nociceptor response to mechanical forces in both the innocuous and noxious range. Moreover, we found that simulating single knockouts of any of the three ion channels, delayed rectifier voltage-gated K⁺ channel (Kv1.1) or mechanosensitive channels Piezo2 or TRPA1, considerably altered the excitability of the nociceptor (i.e., each knockout increased or decreased the number of triggered APs compared to when all channels were present). These results suggest that altering expression of the gene encoding Kv1.1, Piezo2, or TRPA1 might regulate the response of mechanosensitive muscle nociceptors.

SUBMITTER: Nagaraja S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8461020 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and is the most commonly diagnosed cancer. Like other cancers, it is a complex and highly heterogeneous disease involving multiple signaling pathways. Identifying potential therapeutic targets is critical for the development of effective treatment strategies. METHODS:We used a systems biology approach to identify potential key regulatory factors in smoking-induced lung cancer. We first identified genes that were differentially expressed between smokers with normal lungs and those with cancerous lungs, then integrated these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with data from a protein-protein interaction database to build a network model with functional modules for pathway analysis. We also carried out a gene set enrichment analysis of DEG lists using the Kinase Enrichment Analysis (KEA), Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) hubs, and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) databases. RESULTS:Twelve transcription factors were identified as having potential significance in lung cancer (CREB1, NUCKS1, HOXB4, MYCN, MYC, PHF8, TRIM28, WT1, CUX1, CRX, GABP, and TCF3); three of these (CRX, GABP, and TCF) have not been previously implicated in lung carcinogenesis. In addition, 11 kinases were found to be potentially related to lung cancer (MAPK1, IGF1R, RPS6KA1, ATR, MAPK14, MAPK3, MAPK4, MAPK8, PRKCZ, and INSR, and PRKAA1). However, PRKAA1 is reported here for the first time. MEPCE, CDK1, PRKCA, COPS5, GSK3B, BRCA1, EP300, and PIN1 were identified as potential hubs in lung cancer-associated signaling. In addition, we found 18 pathways that were potentially related to lung carcinogenesis, of which 12 (mitogen-activated protein kinase, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Toll-like receptor, ErbB, and insulin signaling; purine and ether lipid metabolism; adherens junctions; regulation of autophagy; snare interactions in vesicular transport; and cell cycle) have been previously identified. CONCLUSION:Our systems-based approach identified potential key molecules in lung carcinogenesis and provides a basis for investigations of tumor development as well as novel drug targets for lung cancer treatment.

Project description:The lack of a deeper understanding of how olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) encode odors has hindered the progress in understanding the olfactory signal processing in higher brain centers. Here we employ methods of system identification to investigate the encoding of time-varying odor stimuli and their representation for further processing in the spike domain by Drosophila OSNs. In order to apply system identification techniques, we built a novel low-turbulence odor delivery system that allowed us to deliver airborne stimuli in a precise and reproducible fashion. The system provides a 1% tolerance in stimulus reproducibility and an exact control of odor concentration and concentration gradient on a millisecond time scale. Using this novel setup, we recorded and analyzed the in-vivo response of OSNs to a wide range of time-varying odor waveforms. We report for the first time that across trials the response of OR59b OSNs is very precise and reproducible. Further, we empirically show that the response of an OSN depends not only on the concentration, but also on the rate of change of the odor concentration. Moreover, we demonstrate that a two-dimensional (2D) Encoding Manifold in a concentration-concentration gradient space provides a quantitative description of the neuron's response. We then use the white noise system identification methodology to construct one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) cascade models of the sensory neuron for a fixed mean odor concentration and fixed contrast. We show that in terms of predicting the intensity rate of the spike train, the 2D LNP model performs on par with the 1D LNP model, with a root mean-square error (RMSE) increase of about 5 to 10%. Surprisingly, we find that for a fixed contrast of the white noise odor waveforms, the nonlinear block of each of the two models changes with the mean input concentration. The shape of the nonlinearities of both the 1D and the 2D LNP model appears to be, for a fixed mean of the odor waveform, independent of the stimulus contrast. This suggests that white noise system identification of Or59b OSNs only depends on the first moment of the odor concentration. Finally, by comparing the 2D Encoding Manifold and the 2D LNP model, we demonstrate that the OSN identification results depend on the particular type of the employed test odor waveforms. This suggests an adaptive neural encoding model for Or59b OSNs that changes its nonlinearity in response to the odor concentration waveforms.

Dataset Information

In silico Identification of Key Factors Driving the Response of Muscle Sensory Neurons to Noxious Stimuli.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets