Dataset Information

The Women's Study for the Alleviation of Vasomotor Symptoms (WAVS): a randomized, controlled trial of a plant-based diet and whole soybeans for postmenopausal women.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study aimed to assess the effects of the combination of a low-fat plant-based diet and soybeans on the frequency and severity of menopausal hot flashes.

Methods

Postmenopausal women (n = 38) reporting two or more hot flashes/day were randomly assigned to a low-fat, vegan diet, including ½ cup (86 g) of cooked soybeans daily, or to no diet changes for 12 weeks. Frequency and severity of hot flashes were recorded using a mobile application, and vasomotor, psychosocial, physical, and sexual symptoms were assessed using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Significance was assessed using t-tests (continuous outcomes) and chi-squared/McNemar tests (binary outcomes).

Results

Total hot flashes decreased 79% in the intervention group (P < 0.001) and 49% in the control group (P = 0.002; between-group P = 0.01). Moderate-to-severe hot flashes decreased 84% in the intervention group (P < 0.001) and 42% in the control group P = 0.009; between-group P = 0.01). From 0 to 12 weeks, 59% (10/17) of intervention-group participants reported becoming free of moderate and severe hot flashes (P = 0.002). There was no change in this variable in the control group (between-group P < 0.001). The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire revealed significantly greater reductions in the intervention group in vasomotor (P < 0.0001), psychosocial (P = 0.04), physical (P < 0.002), and sexual (P = 0.01) domains.

Conclusions

The combination of a low-fat, vegan diet and whole soybeans was associated with reduced frequency and severity of hot flashes and improved quality of life in vasomotor, psychosocial, physical, and sexual domains in postmenopausal women. During the 12-week study period, the majority of intervention-group participants became free of moderate-to-severe hot flashes.

SUBMITTER: Barnard ND

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8462449 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Difficulty sleeping is a common complaint of postmenopausal women. In the REPLENISH trial, the oral 17β-estradiol/progesterone (E2/P4) softgel capsule (TX-001HR; 1 mg E2/100 mg P4 FDA approved as BIJUVATM; TherapeuticsMD, Boca Raton, FL), was shown to reduce moderate to severe hot flush frequency and severity and improve quality of life outcomes in menopausal women with a uterus, while protecting the endometrium. In this analysis, the effect of the E2/P4 capsules on “difficulty sleeping” in postmenopausal women experiencing hot flushes, was assessed by the menopause-specific quality of life (MENQOL) questionnaire and also analyzed by age. The phase 3 REPLENISH trial (NCT01942668), evaluated 4 daily doses of E2/P4 capsules in postmenopausal women (40-65 years, intact uterus) with vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Women with moderate to severe hot flushes (≥7/day or ≥50/week) were randomized to E2/P4 (mg/mg) 1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50, 0.25/50, or placebo (VMS substudy); women with fewer/less severe VMS were randomized to active E2/P4 doses only for endometrial safety. MENQOL was administered at baseline, week 12, and months 6 and 12. The “difficulty sleeping” item was rated using a 7-item Likert scale ranging from “Not at all bothered” (analysis score of 2) to “Extremely bothered” (analysis score of 8) if difficulty sleeping was experienced, if not experienced, the score for the analysis was set to 1. Changes from baseline to week 12, and months 6 and 12 in all women (MITT population) were analyzed by ANCOVA between each E2/P4 groups vs placebo and stratified by age (pre-specified FDA subgroup; <55 and 55+). Treatment groups in the MITT population (n=1833) were E2/P4 1/100 (n=416), 0.5/100 (n=422), 0.5/50 (n=421), 0.25/50 (n=423) or placebo (n=151). The MITT population had a mean age of 55 years; in the <55-year group (n=927) mean age was 51.2 years and in the ≥55-year group (n=906) mean age was 58.1 years. Mean baseline scores for the “difficulty sleeping” item ranged from 5.1 to 5.8 points. In the MITT population, difficulty sleeping significantly improved from baseline with the three highest E2/P4 doses (1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50) compared with placebo at all timepoints (all, P<0.05), except for 0.5/50 at month 6. In women <55 years, the sleep difficulty item significantly improved from baseline at all timepoints with two E2/P4 doses (1/100 and 0.5/50) vs placebo. In women 55+ years, significant improvements from baseline were observed at week 12 with three E2/P4 doses (1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50) vs placebo. In REPLENISH, women treated with E2/P4 capsules containing 1 or 0.5 mg E2 demonstrated significant and sustained improvements in the MENQOL difficulty sleeping assessment, especially those <55 years. These data warrant further evaluation.

Project description:ImportanceEffective, practical, nonpharmacologic therapies are needed to treat menopause-related insomnia symptoms in primary and women's specialty care settings.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) vs menopause education control (MEC).Design, setting, and participantsA single-site, randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 1, 2013, to August 31, 2015, in western Washington State among 106 perimenopausal or postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years with moderate insomnia symptoms (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score, ≥12) and 2 or more daily hot flashes. Blinded assessments were conducted at baseline, 8, and 24 weeks postrandomization. An intent-to-treat analysis was conducted.InterventionsSix CBT-I or MEC telephone sessions in 8 weeks. Participants submitted weekly electronic sleep diaries and received group-specific written educational materials. The CBT-I sessions included sleep restriction, stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, cognitive restructuring, and behavioral homework; MEC sessions provided information about menopause and women's health.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was scores on the ISI (score range, 0-28; scores ≥15 indicate moderate to severe insomnia). Secondary outcome was scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (score range, 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality). Additional outcomes included sleep and hot flash diary variables and hot flash interference.ResultsAt 8 weeks, ISI scores had decreased 9.9 points among 53 women receiving CBT-I (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [3.5] years) and 4.7 points among 53 women receiving MEC (age, 54.7 [4.7] years), a mean between-group difference of 5.2 points (95% CI, -6.1 to -3.3; P < .001). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores decreased 4.0 points in women receiving CBT-I and 1.4 points in women receiving MEC, a mean between-group difference of 2.7 points (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.5; P < .001). Significant group differences were sustained at 24 weeks. At 8 and 24 weeks, 33 of 47 women (70%) and 37 of 44 (84%) in the CBT-I group, respectively, had ISI scores in the no-insomnia range compared with 10 of 41 (24%) and 16 of 37 (43%) in the MEC group, respectively. The CBT-I group also had greater improvements in diary-reported sleep latency, wake time, and sleep efficiency. There were no between-group differences in frequency of daily hot flashes, but hot flash interference was significantly decreased at 8 weeks for the CBT-I group (-15.7; 95% CI, -20.4 to -11.0) compared with the MEC group (-7.1; 95% CI, -14.6 to 0.4) (P = .03), differences that were maintained at 24 weeks for the CBT-I group (-22.8; 95% CI, -28.6 to -16.9) and MEC group (-11.6; 95% CI, -19.4 to -3.8) (P = .003).Conclusions and relevanceTelephone-based CBT-I improved sleep in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with insomnia and hot flashes. Results support further development and testing of centralized CBT-I programs for treating menopausal insomnia.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01936441.