Dataset Information

An innovative user-friendly platform for Covid-19 pandemic databases and resources.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The current coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global outbreak of a disease from a new coronavirus. Several databases have been published on this pandemic, but the research community still needs an easy way to get comprehensive information on COVID-19.

Objectives

COVID-19 pandemic database (CO-19 PDB) aims to provide wonderful insights for COVID-19 researchers with the well-gathered of all the COVID-19 data to one platform, which is a global challenge for the research community these days.

Methods

We gathered 59 updated databases since December-2019 until May 2021 and divided them into six categories: digital image database, genomic database, literature database, visualization tools database, chemical structure database, and social science database. These categories focus on taking number of functions from the images, information from gene sequences, updates from relevant papers, essays, reports, articles, and books, the data or information in the form of maps, graphs, and charts, information of bonds between atoms, and updates about events of the physical and social environment, respectively.

Results

Users can search the information of interest in two ways including typing the name of the database in the search bar or by clicking the right category directly. Computer languages such as CSS, PHP, HTML, Java, etc. are utilized to construct CO-19 PDB.

Conclusion

This article attempts to compile up-to-date appropriate COVID-19 datasets and resources that have not been compiled and given in such an accessible and user-friendly manner. As a result, the CO-19 PDB offers extensive open data sharing for both worldwide research communities and local people. Further, we have planned future development of new features, that will be awesome for future study.

SUBMITTER: Ullah S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8465267 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in the features, input-output behaviour and user interface for available bioinformatics tools and services is still a bottleneck for both expert and non-expert users. Advancement in providing common interfaces over such tools and services are gaining interest among researchers. However, the lack of (meta-) information about input-output data and parameter prevents to provide automated and standardized solutions, which can assist users in setting the appropriate parameters. These limitations must be resolved especially in the workflow-based solution in order to ease the integration of software. FINDINGS: We report a Taverna Workbench plugin: the XworX BIFI (Beautiful Interfaces for Inputs) implemented as a solution for the aforementioned issues. BIFI provides a Graphical User Interface (GUI) definition language used to layout the user interface and to define parameter options for Taverna workflows. BIFI is also able to submit GUI Definition Files (GDF) directly or discover appropriate instances from a configured repository. In the absence of a GDF, BIFI generates a default interface. CONCLUSION: The Taverna Workbench is an open source software providing the ability to combine various services within a workflow. Nevertheless, users can supply input data to the workflow via a simple user interface providing only a text area to enter the input in text form. The workflow may contain meta-information in human readable form such as description text for the port and an example value. However, not all workflow ports are documented so well or have all the required information.BIFI uses custom user interface components for ports which give users feedback on the parameter data type or structure to be used for service execution and enables client-side data validations. Moreover, BIFI offers user interfaces that allow users to interactively construct workflow views and share them with the community, thus significantly increasing usability of heterogeneous, distributed service consumption.

Project description:Background/objectiveQuality innovation networks' (QINs') support of nursing homes (NHs) is a national strategy to systematically improve the quality of care experienced by residents. QINs have been tasked with providing NHs with information, resources, tools, and training to assist in developing best practices and to support quality improvement efforts in infection prevention (including joining the National Healthcare Safety Network [NHSN]), avoid unnecessary hospitalizations, and increase use of hospice and palliative care. Our objective was to examine QIN online resources provided to NHs to support best practices and improvement efforts.DesignAn environmental scan was conducted.Setting/measurementEach QIN website was evaluated on (1) usability, (2) accessibility and prominence, (3) website design, (4) availability of training materials, (5) recency of update, (6) identification of key personnel, and (8) quality focus areas (ie, infection prevention, NHSN, antibiotic stewardship, reducing unnecessary or avoidable hospitalizations, and palliative and hospice care).ResultsQIN websites varied dramatically in design and resources offered to NHs as well as in the content and ease of finding information. Antibiotic stewardship and NHSN resources were widely available. Information (ie, fact sheets) on reducing avoidable hospitalizations was commonly available, while resources, such as tool kits, webinars, training, and contact information for personnel on reducing avoidable hospitalizations, were available to 23 states. Infection prevention resources were varied and limited to 34 states. Both palliative care and hospice resources were available through only a few QINs (13 states and 20 states, respectively).ConclusionsGiven that much of the information, tool kits, and resources are standardized and in the public domain, centralized resources with tailored or specialized links to unique local resources, like in-person trainings and state-specific contact information, could be more beneficial for NHs. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2376-2381, 2019.