Shoulder Isokinetic Strength Deficit in Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Daley P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8465876 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a chronic painful and disabling condition. Patients complain about upper-limb paresthesia or weakness. Weakness has been considered one of the diagnostic criteria of NTOS, but objective comparisons to healthy controls are lacking. We compared the grip and the key pinch strengths between NTOS patients and healthy controls. Grip strength was evaluated with a hydraulic hand dynamometer and the key pinch with a pinch gauge. All the patients with NTOS completed a QuickDASH. We included prospectively 85 patients with NTOS, 73% female and 27% male. The mean age was 40.4 ± 9.6. They were compared to 85 healthy subjects, 77.6% female and 22.4% male. Concerning the grip, symptomatic hands of NTOS patients had significantly 30% less strength compared to control hands (p ≤ 0.001), and 19% less strength compared to asymptomatic hands (p = 0.03). Concerning the key pinch, symptomatic hands of patients with NTOS had significantly 19.5% less strength compared to control hands (p ≤ 0.001). Grip and key pinch strengths had a significant correlation with the QuickDASH (r = -0.515 and r = -0.403, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). Patients with NTOS presented an objective hand strength deficit compared to healthy controls. This deficit was significantly correlated to the upper-limb disability. These findings confirm the interest of hand strength evaluation in the diagnostic process of patients with NTOS.
| S-EPMC8153137 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (N-TOS) is a chronic compressive brachial plexopathy that involves the C8, T1 roots, and/or lower trunk. Medial antebrachial cutaneous (MABC) nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormality is reportedly one of the most sensitive findings among the features of N-TOS. The aim of the present study was to report clinical features, imaging findings, treatment, and prognoses of two N-TOS patients with no abnormalities in electrophysiological studies. Both patients presented with paresthesia of unilateral arm, and examination revealed no neurologic deficits. Electrophysiologic studies including MABC NCS were normal. Computed tomography (CT) angiography and brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the patients showed compression and displacement of the neurovascular bundle in the thoracic outlet by causative structures. Due to their sensory symptoms and CT angiography and brachial plexus MRI findings, after excluding other diseases, we diagnosed them with N-TOS. With the development of imaging techniques, more patients presenting with clinical features of lower trunk brachial plexopathy and anomalous structures compressing the neurovascular bundle on imaging studies can be diagnosed with N-TOS, even if electrophysiologic studies including MABC NCS do not show abnormalities.
| S-EPMC8062872 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction/aimsNeurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) is a heterogeneous and often disputed entity. An electrodiagnostic pattern of T1 > C8 axon involvement is considered characteristic for the diagnosis of NTOS. However, since the advent of high-resolution nerve ultrasound (US) imaging, we have encountered several patients with a proven entrapment of the lower brachial plexus who showed a different, variable electrodiagnostic pattern.MethodsIn this retrospective case series, 14 patients with an NTOS diagnosis with a verified source of compression of the lower brachial plexus and abnormal findings on their electrodiagnostic testing were included. Their medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical, imaging, and electrodiagnostic data.ResultsSeven patients showed results consistent with the "classic" T1 axon > C8 pattern of involvement. Less typical findings included equally severe involvement of T1 and C8 axons, more severe C8 involvement, pure motor abnormalities, neurogenic changes on needle electromyography in the flexor carpi radialis and biceps brachii muscles, and one patient with an abnormal sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude for the median sensory response recorded from the third digit. Patients with atypical findings on electrodiagnostic testing underwent nerve imaging more often compared to patients with classic findings (seven of seven patients vs. five of seven respectively), especially nerve ultrasound.DiscussionWhen there is a clinical suspicion of NTOS, an electrodiagnostic finding other than the classic T1 > C8 pattern of involvement does not rule out the diagnosis. High resolution nerve imaging is valuable to diagnose additional patients with this treatable condition.
| S-EPMC9292757 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is significant variation in methods used for diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). The lack of definitions and criteria for diagnosis as well as controversy in treatment options hampers standardized reporting of outcomes. In the orthopedic and plastic hand surgery literature, there are not standardized guidelines to direct evidence-based practice for hand surgeons relating to NTOS. Hence, expert consensus may provide guidance for clinical practice.MethodsAn international workgroup of 21 expert hand surgeons with cumulative experience of 5519 NTOS procedures was assembled. The Delphi method was used to arrive at consensus recommendations to guide diagnosis, treatment, surgery, and postoperative management of patients with NTOS.ResultsThe workgroup achieved majority (greater than 75%) consensus with 17 statements. A modified version of the Society for Vascular Surgery clinical diagnostic criteria is recommended for diagnosis of NTOS. The elevated arm stress test and Tinel sign are recommended as provocative maneuvers. A cervical spine or chest radiograph should be routinely obtained preoperatively. Conservative management should be first line for NTOS, except in patients with significant muscle atrophy or weakness. An anterior supraclavicular approach is recommended for exposure of the supraclavicular brachial plexus, with the necessity for an additional infraclavicular approach or adjunctive surgeries indicated for specific patients.ConclusionsStandardized consensus guidelines help guide management of NTOS by specialized hand surgeons, with an aim toward standardizing criteria for diagnosis and treatment of patients as well as measures and tools used for research and reporting of outcomes.
| S-EPMC11357692 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objectives: The treatment for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) conventionally involves first-rib resection (FRR) surgery, which is quite challenging to perform, especially for novices, and is often associated with postoperative complications. Herein, we report a new segmental resection approach through piezo surgery that involves using a bone cutter, which can uniquely provide a soft tissue protective effect. Methods: This retrospective study involved the examination of 26 NTOS patients who underwent piezo surgery and another group of 30 patients who underwent FRR using the conventional technique. In the patient group that underwent piezo surgery, the rib was first resected into two pieces using a piezoelectric device and subsequently removed. In the patient group that underwent conventional surgery, the first rib was removed as one piece using a rib cutter and rongeurs. Results: The piezo surgery group had significantly shorter operative time (96.85 ± 14.66 vs. 143.33 ± 25.64 min, P < 0.001) and FRR duration (8.73 ± 2.11 vs. 22.23 ± 6.27 min, P < 0.001) than the conventional group. The posterior stump length of the residual rib was shorter in the piezo surgery group than in the conventional group (0.54 ± 0.19 vs. 0.65 ± 0.15 cm, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and scores of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Cervical Brachial Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ), and the visual analog scale (VAS). Even the TOS index (NTOS Index = [DASH + (0.83 × CBSQ) + (10 × VAS)]/3) and patient self-assessments of both the groups showed no significant differences. Univariate analyses indicated that the type of treatment affected operative time. Conclusion: Our results suggest that piezo surgery is safe, effective, and simple for segmental FRR in NTOS patients. Piezo surgery provides a more thorough FRR without damaging adjacent soft tissues in a relatively short duration and achieves similar functional recovery as conventional techniques. Therefore, piezo surgery can be a promising alternative for FRR during the surgical treatment of NTOS.
| S-EPMC8632710 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is caused by a neurologic compression of the brachial plexus before it reaches the arm. Three anatomic areas are common locations for such an entrapment because of their congenital and/or acquired tightness: the interscalene triangle, the costoclavicular space, and the retropectoralis minor space. Because the compression level usually remains unknown, the treatment is still controversial and most teams focus on only one potential site. We propose an all-endoscopic technique of complete brachial plexus neurolysis that can be divided into three parts, one for each entrapment area. First, with a subacromial approach, the suprascapular nerve is released distally from the transverse ligament and then followed up to the upper trunk. Once the upper trunk is located, the middle and lower trunks are dissected in the interscalene triangle. Then, by use of an infraclavicular approach, the brachial plexus is released from the costoclavicular space by detaching the subclavian muscle from the clavicle. Finally, the pectoralis minor is released from the coracoid so that the brachial plexus is distally freed. This technique seems to be safe and reproducible, but expert knowledge of the neurovascular anatomy and advanced endoscopic skills are required.
| S-EPMC5620737 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a controversial and uncommon syndrome. Three different diagnoses can be made based on the compressed structure: arterial TOS, venous TOS, and neurogenic TOS. Diagnosing TOS, especially neurogenic TOS, remains difficult since a single diagnostic tool does not exist. Although this resulted in a lot of confusion, standardization of care and outcome improved daily care practice measures in the last decade. Current treatment algorithms consist of both conservative and surgical treatment approaches, which should be chosen depending on the type of TOS and extend of the complaints. Surgical treatment of TOS is performed via thoracic outlet decompression (TOD). TOD surgery includes complete resection of the first rib (cartilage to cartilage), transection of the scalene muscles and complete neurolysis/venolysis or arteriolysis. Four different approaches can be chosen for TOD surgery: the transaxillary (TA), supraclavicular (SC), paraclavicular (PC), and infraclavicular (IC) approach. The TA, SC, and PC approach can be used for every form of TOS. However, the PC approach is mostly used for treating venous TOS. The IC approach has no role in treating neurogenic or arterial TOS and is only used for venous TOS. Every approach has its own benefits and limitations and literature does not agree on what approach is best. Therefore, the used surgical approach for TOD should be based on the surgeon's preference and experience. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the diagnostic pathway and provide an in-depth description of the surgical approach in each form of TOS.
| S-EPMC10797336 | biostudies-literature
Project description:UnlabelledThe authors' experience with the supraclavicular approach for the treatment of patients with primary thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) and for patients with recurrent TOS or iatrogenic brachial plexus injury after prior transaxillary first rib resection is presented. The records of 33 patients (34 plexuses) with TOS who presented for evaluation and treatment were analyzed. Of these, 12 (35%) plexuses underwent surgical treatment, and 22 (65%) plexuses were managed non-operatively. The patients who were treated non-operatively and had an adequate follow-up (n = 11) were used as a control group. Of the 12 surgically treated patients, five patients underwent primary surgery; four patients had secondary surgery for recurrent TOS; and three patients had surgery for iatrogenic brachial plexus injury. All patients presented with severe pain, and most of them had neurologic symptoms. All nine (100%) patients who underwent primary surgery (n = 5) and secondary surgery for recurrent TOS (n = 4) demonstrated excellent or good results. On the other hand, six (54%) of the 11 patients from the control group had some benefit from the non-operative treatment. Reoperation in three patients with iatrogenic brachial plexus injury resulted in good result in one case and in fair results in two patients; however, all patients were pain-free. No complications were encountered. Supraclavicular exploration of the brachial plexus enables precise assessment of the contents of the thoracic inlet area. It allows for safe identification and release of all abnormal anatomical structures and complete first rib resection with minimal risk to neurovascular structures. Additionally, this approach allows for the appropriate nerve reconstruction in cases of prior transaxillary iatrogenic plexus injury.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11552-009-9253-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
| S-EPMC2920383 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe clinical outcomes of reoperations for recurrent neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS) remain undefined.MethodsFrom 2009 to 2019, 90 patients with recurrent NTOS underwent anatomically complete supraclavicular reoperation after previous operation(s) performed at other institutions using either supraclavicular (Prev-SC = 48), transaxillary (Prev-TA = 31), or multiple/combination (Prev-MC = 11) approaches. Prospectively maintained data were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe mean patient age was 39.9 ± 1.4 years, 72% were female, and the mean interval after previous operation was 4.1 ± 0.6 years. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 62 ± 2, reflecting substantial preoperative disability. Residual scalene muscle was present in 100% Prev-TA, 79% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). Retained/residual first rib was present in 90% Prev-TA, 75% Prev-SC, and 55% Prev-MC (P < .05). There were no differences in operative time (overall 210 ± 5 minutes), length of hospital stay (4.7 ± 0.2 days), or 30-day readmissions (7%). During follow-up of 5.6 ± 0.3 years, the improvement in QuickDASH scores was 21 ± 2 (36% ± 3%) (P < .01) and patient-rated outcomes were excellent in 10%, good in 36%, fair in 43%, and poor in 11%.ConclusionsAnatomically complete decompression for recurrent NTOS can be safely and effectively accomplished by supraclavicular reoperation, regardless of the type of previous operation. Residual scalene muscle and retained/residual first rib are more frequently encountered after transaxillary operations than after supraclavicular or multiple/combined operations. Supraclavicular reoperation can achieve significant symptom reduction and functional improvement for approximately 90% of patients with recurrent NTOS.
| S-EPMC9608271 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a clinical diagnosis resulting from the impingement of neurovascular structures between the clavicle and first rib. Effective prevention and nonoperative treatment in high-performance athletes with TOS are not well documented. The objective of reporting this case was to discuss the symptom progression, relevant clinical findings, and rehabilitation of an overhead athlete with diagnosed neurogenic TOS. Numerous rehabilitative techniques may be used to treat an athlete with TOS, with an emphasis on restoring full shoulder mobility, motor control, and normalized scapular mechanics in a throwing athlete, as well as improving functional thoracic range of motion. Modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation and targeted muscle exercises are incorporated in the process. In the case presented, a collegiate-level throwing athlete returned to full participation at her previous level of play within 18 weeks of rehabilitation initiation. This report details the clinical findings and treatment options available to address pathology in an overhead athlete with a diagnosis of TOS. The clinical case example shows techniques that may help guide the clinician in establishing effective nonoperative or postoperative treatments for TOS. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.
| S-EPMC8811512 | biostudies-literature