Dataset Information

Noncontrast assessment of blood-brain barrier permeability to water: Shorter acquisition, test-retest reproducibility, and comparison with contrast-based method.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Assessment of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability without the need for contrast agent is desirable, and the ability to measure the permeability to small molecules such as water may further increase the sensitivity in detecting diseases. This study proposed a time-efficient, noncontrast method to measure BBB permeability to water, evaluated its test-retest reproducibility, and compared it with a contrast agent-based method.

Methods

A single-delay water extraction with phase-contrast arterial spin tagging (WEPCAST) method was devised in which spatial profile of the signal along the superior sagittal sinus was used to estimate bolus arrival time, and the WEPCAST signal at the corresponding location was used to compute water extraction fraction, which was combined with global cerebral blood flow to estimate BBB permeability surface area product to water. The reliability of WEPCAST sequence was examined in terms of intrasession, intersession, and inter-vendor (Philips [Ingenia, Best, the Netherlands] and Siemens [Prisma, Erlangen, Germany]) reproducibility. Finally, we compared this new technique to a contrast agent-based method.

Results

Single-delay WEPCAST reduced the scan duration from approximately 20 min to 5 min. Extract fraction values estimated from single-delay WEPCAST showed good consistency with the multi-delay method (R = 0.82, P = .004). Group-averaged permeability surface area product values were found to be 137.5 ± 9.3 mL/100 g/min. Intrasession, intersession, and inter-vendor coefficient of variation of the permeability surface area product values were 6.6 ± 4.5%, 6.9 ± 3.7%, and 8.9 ± 3.0%, respectively. Finally, permeability surface area product obtained from WEPCAST MRI showed a significant correlation with that from the contrast-based method (R = .73, P = .02).

Conclusion

Single-delay WEPCAST MRI can measure BBB permeability to water within 5 min with an intrasession, intersession, and inter-vendor test-retest reproducibility of 6% to 9%. This method may provide a useful marker of BBB breakdown in clinical studies.

SUBMITTER: Lin Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8466682 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Quantitative size, shape, and texture features derived from computed tomographic (CT) images may be useful as predictive, prognostic, or response biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, to be useful, such features must be reproducible, non-redundant, and have a large dynamic range. We developed a set of quantitative three-dimensional (3D) features to describe segmented tumors and evaluated their reproducibility to select features with high potential to have prognostic utility. Thirty-two patients with NSCLC were subjected to unenhanced thoracic CT scans acquired within 15 min of each other under an approved protocol. Primary lung cancer lesions were segmented using semi-automatic 3D region growing algorithms. Following segmentation, 219 quantitative 3D features were extracted from each lesion, corresponding to size, shape, and texture, including features in transformed spaces (laws, wavelets). The most informative features were selected using the concordance correlation coefficient across test-retest, the biological range and a feature independence measure. There were 66 (30.14%) features with concordance correlation coefficient???0.90 across test-retest and acceptable dynamic range. Of these, 42 features were non-redundant after grouping features with R (2) Bet???0.95. These reproducible features were found to be predictive of radiological prognosis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 91% for a size-based feature and 92% for the texture features (runlength, laws). We tested the ability of image features to predict a radiological prognostic score on an independent NSCLC (39 adenocarcinoma) samples, the AUC for texture features (runlength emphasis, energy) was 0.84 while the conventional size-based features (volume, longest diameter) was 0.80. Test-retest and correlation analyses have identified non-redundant CT image features with both high intra-patient reproducibility and inter-patient biological range. Thus making the case that quantitative image features are informative and prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC.

Project description:SignificanceThe Ohio Contrast Cards are a repeatable test of contrast sensitivity, and they reveal higher contrast sensitivity for low-vision patients than is shown by the Pelli-Robson chart.PurposeThis study aimed to compare the contrast sensitivity results and test/retest ±limits of agreement for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart on two challenging groups of participants, and to compare the Ohio Contrast Card results with grating acuity and the Pelli-Robson results with letter acuity.MethodsThe Ohio Contrast Card and Pelli-Robson tests were each performed twice by two different examiners within one visit on 40 elder patients in Primary Vision Care (>65 years old) and 23 to 27 low-vision school-aged students. Grating acuity was measured using the Teller Acuity Cards (all participants), and letter acuity was measured using ClearChart (elders) or the Bailey-Lovie chart (students).ResultsThe ±95% limits of agreement were similar for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson chart. The elders' limits of agreement were ±0.27 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.28 (Pelli-Robson); the students' limits of agreement were ±0.42 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.51 (Pelli-Robson). However, Ohio Contrast Card results were 0.41 log10 Michelson units more sensitive than the Pelli-Robson chart (over one line on the Pelli-Robson chart) for the elders and 0.90 log10 Michelson units (three lines on the Pelli-Robson chart) more sensitive for the elders (0.11 and 0.6 log10 Weber units, respectively). The Pelli-Robson results were correlated with letter acuities and Ohio Contrast Card results for both groups, and the Ohio Contrast Card results were correlated with Teller Acuity Card acuities for the elders.ConclusionsThe Ohio Contrast Cards and Pelli-Robson chart are similarly repeatable. Both contrast sensitivity tests can provide additional clinical information that is not available through visual acuity testing, and Ohio Contrast Card may provide additional information not available from the Pelli-Robson chart.