Dataset Information

Regional Variation of Gap Junctional Connections in the Mammalian Inner Retina.

ABSTRACT: The retinas of many species show regional specialisations that are evident in the differences in the processing of visual input from different parts of the visual field. Regional specialisation is thought to reflect an adaptation to the natural visual environment, optical constraints, and lifestyle of the species. Yet, little is known about regional differences in synaptic circuitry. Here, we were interested in the topographical distribution of connexin-36 (Cx36), the major constituent of electrical synapses in the retina. We compared the retinas of mice, rats, and cats to include species with different patterns of regional specialisations in the analysis. First, we used the density of Prox1-immunoreactive amacrine cells as a marker of any regional specialisation, with higher cell density signifying more central regions. Double-labelling experiments showed that Prox1 is expressed in AII amacrine cells in all three species. Interestingly, large Cx36 plaques were attached to about 8-10% of Prox1-positive amacrine cell somata, suggesting the strong electrical coupling of pairs or small clusters of cell bodies. When analysing the regional changes in the volumetric density of Cx36-immunoreactive plaques, we found a tight correlation with the density of Prox1-expressing amacrine cells in the ON, but not in the OFF sublamina in all three species. The results suggest that the relative contribution of electrical synapses to the ON- and OFF-pathways of the retina changes with retinal location, which may contribute to functional ON/OFF asymmetries across the visual field.

SUBMITTER: Fusz K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8466939 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Methamphetamine (meth) is a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant that results in psychological and physical dependency. The long-term effects of meth within the CNS include neuronal plasticity changes, blood-brain barrier compromise, inflammation, electrical dysfunction, neuronal/glial toxicity, and an increased risk to infectious diseases including HIV. Most of the reported meth effects in the CNS are related to dysregulation of chemical synapses by altering the release and uptake of neurotransmitters, especially dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. However, little is known about the effects of meth on connexin (Cx) containing channels, such as gap junctions (GJ) and hemichannels (HC). We examined the effects of meth on Cx expression, function, and its role in NeuroAIDS. We found that meth altered Cx expression and localization, decreased GJ communication between neurons and astrocytes, and induced the opening of Cx43/Cx36 HC. Furthermore, we found that these changes in GJ and HC induced by meth treatment were mediated by activation of dopamine receptors, suggesting that dysregulation of dopamine signaling induced by meth is essential for GJ and HC compromise. Meth-induced changes in GJ and HC contributed to amplified CNS toxicity by dysregulating glutamate metabolism and increasing the susceptibility of neurons and astrocytes to bystander apoptosis induced by HIV. Together, our results indicate that connexin containing channels, GJ and HC, are essential in the pathogenesis of meth and increase the sensitivity of the CNS to HIV CNS disease. Methamphetamine (meth) is an extremely addictive central nervous system stimulant. Meth reduced gap junctional (GJ) communication by inducing internalization of connexin-43 (Cx43) in astrocytes and reducing expression of Cx36 in neurons by a mechanism involving activation of dopamine receptors (see cartoon). Meth-induced changes in Cx containing channels increased extracellular levels of glutamate and resulted in higher sensitivity of neurons and astrocytes to apoptosis in response to HIV infection.

Dataset Information

Regional Variation of Gap Junctional Connections in the Mammalian Inner Retina.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets