Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Data Reliability in a Citizen Science Protocol for Monitoring Stingless Bees Flight Activity.


ABSTRACT: Although the quality of citizen science (CS) data is often a concern, evidence for high-quality CS data increases in the scientific literature. This study aimed to assess the data reliability of a structured CS protocol for monitoring stingless bees' flight activity. We tested (1) data accuracy for replication among volunteers and for expert validation and (2) precision, comparing dispersion between citizen scientists and expert data. Two distinct activity dimensions were considered: (a) perception of flight activity and (b) flight activity counts (entrances, exits, and pollen load). No significant differences were found among groups regarding entrances and exits. However, replicator citizen scientists presented a higher chance of perceiving pollen than original data collectors and experts, likely a false positive. For those videos in which there was an agreement about pollen presence, the effective pollen counts were similar (with higher dispersion for citizen scientists), indicating the reliability of CS-collected data. The quality of the videos, a potential source of variance, did not influence the results. Increasing practical training could be an alternative to improve pollen data quality. Our study shows that CS provides reliable data for monitoring bee activity and highlights the relevance of a multi-dimensional approach for assessing CS data quality.

SUBMITTER: Leocadio JN 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8467663 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3655480 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA1169349 | ENA
| PRJNA1060844 | ENA
| PRJNA753230 | ENA
| S-EPMC6624211 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10914215 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB22201 | ENA
| S-EPMC5878931 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9836331 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6823441 | biostudies-literature