Dataset Information

Vitreous M2 Macrophage-Derived Microparticles Promote RPE Cell Proliferation and Migration in Traumatic Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To characterize vitreous microparticles (MPs) in patients with traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and investigate their role in PVR pathogenesis.

Methods

Vitreous MPs were characterized in patients with traumatic PVR, patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) complicated with PVR, and control subjects by flow cytometry. The presence of M2 macrophages in epiretinal membranes was measured by immunostaining. Vitreous cytokines were quantified by ELISA assay. For in vitro studies, MPs isolated from THP-1 cell differentiated M1 and M2 macrophages, termed M1-MPs and M2-MPs, were used. The effects and mechanisms of M1-MPs and M2-MPs on RPE cell proliferation, migration, and epithelial to mesenchymal transition were analyzed.

Results

Vitreous MPs derived from photoreceptors, microglia, and macrophages were significantly increased in patients with traumatic PVR in comparison with control and patients with RRD (PVR), whereas no significance was identified between the two control groups. M2 macrophages were present in epiretinal membranes, and their signature cytokines were markedly elevated in the vitreous of patients with traumatic PVR. Moreover, MPs from M2 macrophages were increased in the vitreous of patients with traumatic PVR. In vitro analyses showed that M2-MPs promoted the proliferation and migration of RPE cells via activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. However, M2-MPs did not induce the expression of fibrotic proteins, including fibronectin, α-smooth muscle actin, and N-cadherin in RPE cells.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated increased MP shedding in the vitreous of patients with traumatic PVR; specifically, MPs derived from M2 polarized macrophages may contribute to PVR progression by stimulating RPE cell proliferation and migration.

SUBMITTER: Song Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8475283 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal pirfenidone for inhibition of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in a model of penetrating ocular injury.Patients and methodsPenetrating trauma was induced on the retina of rabbit and treated either with 0.1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or 0.1 ml of 0.5% pirfenidone, and development of PVR was evaluated clinically and graded after 1 month. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry with transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), and collagen-1 were performed to assess the fibrotic changes. Expression of cytokines in the vitro-retinal tissues at different time points following pirfenidone and PBS injection was examined by RT-PCR. Availability of pirfenidone in the vitreous of rabbit at various time points was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography following injection of 0.1 ml of 0.5% pirfenidone. In normal rabbit eye, 0.1 ml of 0.5% pirfenidone was injected to evaluate any toxic effect.ResultsClinical assessment and grading revealed prevention of PVR formation in pirfenidone-treated animals, gross histology, and histopathology confirmed the observation. Immunohistochemistry showed prevention in the expression of collagen-I, αSMA, and TGFβ in the pirfenidone-treated eyes compared to the PBS-treated eyes. Pirfenidone inhibited increased gene expression of cytokines observed in control eyes. Pirfenidone could be detected up to 48 h in the vitreous of rabbit eye following single intravitreal injection. Pirfenidone did not show any adverse effect following intravitreal injection; eyes were devoid of any abnormal clinical sign, intraocular pressure, and electroretinography did not show any significant change and histology of retina remained unchanged.ConclusionThis animal study shows that pirfenidone might be a potential therapy for PVR. Further clinical study will be useful to evaluate the clinical application of pirfenidone.

Project description:PurposeTo compare baseline levels of exploratory biomarkers in the vitreous fluid of patients with primary retinal detachment who subsequently develop proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) versus those who do not.MethodsIn this exploratory case-control study, we evaluated the baseline protein biomarker levels from a biobank containing the vitreous fluid of patients who had undergone primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Undiluted samples were collected at the time of PPV and stored at -80°C. Samples from 13 patients who developed PVR within 6 months (PVR group) and 13 age- and gender-matched controls who did not develop PVR (control group) were included. Protein abundance levels were evaluated using a proximity extension assay, and a confirmatory enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure the concentration of vimentin.ResultsBaseline vimentin (Normalized Protein eXpression [NPX], 8.6 vs. 6.4, P < 0.0001) and heme oxygenase 1 (NPX 8.9 vs. 7.0, P < 0.001) levels were found to be elevated in vitreous fluid of patients who subsequently developed PVR compared to those who did not. Confirmatory analysis using ELISA demonstrated mean vimentin concentrations of 7254 vs. 2727 ng/mL in the PVR versus control groups (P = 0.0152). The odds ratio for developing PVR was 14 (confidence interval, 1.4-168; P = 0.03), assuming a baseline vimentin threshold of 7500 ng/mL.ConclusionsVimentin is an intermediate filament protein expressed by retinal glial cells, and our data combined with prior evidence suggest that it may serve as an early vitreous biomarker for subsequent PVR formation and reactive gliosis. Furthermore, we found, for the first time, elevated baseline levels of heme oxygenase 1, a measurable indicator of oxidative stress.Translational relevanceOur positive findings could impact clinical care for retinal detachment patients by facilitating risk stratification for targeted interventions or closer monitoring in those at the highest risk of developing PVR.

Project description:Purpose: The development of vitreoretinal scars remains an unsolved challenge in clinical practice and often leads to repeated revision surgery and blindness due to lack of efficient therapy. The aim of this study was to characterize the cellular and molecular environment in vitreoretinal scar tissue from patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in comparison to membranes of the vitreoretinal junction, in order to subsequently identify potential drug treatment options using bioinformatics techniques. Methods: A total of 23 patients undergoing vitrectomy for retinal detachment due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR, n = 15), idiopathic macular hole (MH, n = 10) or idiopathic macular pucker (MP, n = 8), were included in this study. Vitreoretinal samples were analysed by RNA sequencing, MS-CyTOF proteomic and by conventional immunohistochemistry. The cellular microenvironment was assessed by bioinformatics cell type enrichment analysis. Drug target screening was performed by using a transcriptome-based drug-repurposing approach using drug-exposure transcriptome data from public available databases. Results: RNA sequencing of vitreoretinal tissue samples showed distinct transcriptional differences of PVR, ERM and ILM samples allowing an accurate clustering according to the tissue types. The cellular microenvironment of PVR membranes was characterized by the enrichment of melanocytes, astrocytes and various immune cell types, such as M2 macrophages. Differential gene expression (DEG) analysis revealed XX up- and XX downregulated genes in PVR compared to ILM. Among them, FN1 (fibronectin1), SPARC (osteonectin) and various collagens were among the most upregulated factors in PVR, contributing to biological processes such as the organization of extracellular structures, the regulation of cell adhesion and the morphogenesis of blood vessels. Finally, we identified 13 drugs that induce a gene expression profile complementary to the PVR signature and thus represent potential therapeutic options for PVR, including aminocaproic acid and various topoisomerase 2A inhibitors such as doxorubicin, etoposide and mitoxantrone. Conclusion: The present study reveals significant differences in the transcriptional signature of vitreoretinal scar tissue including PVR, MP and ILM tissue. Among a plethora of differentially expressed genes, FN1 and SPARC appeared to be central mediators underlying PVR development. Based on the transcriptome analyses, aminocaproic acid and topoisomerase-2 inhibitors, such as doxorubicin, etoposide and mitoxantrone, were identified as compatible drugs for the treatment of PVR.