Dataset Information

Use of Lean Healthcare to Improve Hospital Throughput and Reduce LOS.

ABSTRACT: Improving the discharge process is an area of focus throughout healthcare organizations. Capacity constraints, efficiency improvement, patient safety, and quality care are driving forces for many discharge process workgroups.

Methods

Following the Pareto principle, we focused on improving the discharge process on the medical-surgical units that received the most patients admitted from the emergency department. Increased demand for medical-surgical beds, renovations, and diminished bed capacity made it imperative to improve efficiency using quality improvement techniques. A core team of frontline staff decreased the time between computer entry of discharge orders and patient's departure from the unit to less than 60 minutes, with 80% compliance. The team developed a daily dashboard that detailed the process and outcome measures to create situational awareness and daily visual management. Additional observations of staff workflow uncovered excessive walking for printer use. Printers were placed at the point of use to reduce transport times. Next, using survey results provided by patients on discharge quality, a Treasure Map that aided with teach-back and Team Discharge were implemented to level the staff's workload. Finally, physicians discharged patients earlier in the day. They standardized their discharge criteria to remove subjectivity from the discharge process and enable better team involvement.

Results

After implementing 4 interventions, the average time between computer entry of discharge orders and patient's departure from the unit decreased (94.26 versus 65.98 minutes; P < 0.001), simultaneously reducing our average length of stay from 5.62 to 4.81 days (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In conclusion, hardwiring proven interventions and complementing them with daily visual management led to significant, sustained results.

SUBMITTER: Mangum CD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8476052 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the different self-management models (multidisciplinary case management, regularly supported self-management, and minimally supported self-management) and self-monitoring models against usual care and education to determine which are most effective at reducing healthcare use and improving quality of life in asthma.DesignSystematic review and network meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EconLit, Embase, Health Economics Evaluations Database, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2000 to April 2019.Review methodsRandomised controlled trials involving the different self-management models for asthma were included. The primary outcomes were healthcare use (hospital admission or emergency visit) and quality of life. Summary standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% credible intervals were estimated using bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.ResultsFrom 1178 citations, 105 trials comprising 27 767 participants were included. In terms of healthcare use, both multidisciplinary case management (SMD -0.18, 95% credible interval -0.32 to -0.05) and regularly supported self-management (-0.30, -0.46 to -0.15) were significantly better than usual care. For quality of life, only regularly supported self-management (SMD 0.54, 0.11 to 0.96) showed a statistically significant benefit compared with usual care. For trials including adolescents/children (age 5-18 years), only regularly supported self-management showed statistically significant benefits (healthcare use: SMD -0.21, -0.40 to -0.03; quality of life: 0.23, 0.03 to 0.48). Multidisciplinary case management (SMD -0.32, -0.50 to -0.16) and regularly supported self-management (-0.32, -0.53 to -0.11) were most effective at reducing healthcare use in patients with symptoms of severe asthma at baseline.ConclusionsThis network meta-analysis indicates that regularly supported self-management reduces the use of healthcare resources and improves quality of life across all levels of asthma severity. Future healthcare investments should provide support that offer reviews totalling at least two hours to establish self-management skills, reserving multidisciplinary case management for patients with complex disease.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO number CRD42019121350.

Project description:ObjectiveTo describe the reported prevalence of cannabis use and co-use with prescription medications among older adult patients attending primary care (PC) clinics in Los Angeles, CA.MethodsWe used electronic health record (EHR) data from sixty PC clinics part of a university-based, urban healthcare system. Patients' ≥50 years of age with an annual physical examination between July 2019 and May 2020 were eligible for inclusion (n = 42,555). Cannabis use was assessed by clinic staff at the time of the visit and recorded in the EHR. We also used EHR data on clinical characteristics including current prescriptions and comorbidities.ResultsThe median age was 63 years (range: 50-101) and 56% were female. Recent cannabis use was reported by 7.6%, which was higher than tobacco use (4.0%; p < 0.01). Prevalence of cannabis use was higher among patients prescribed psychotropic medications. For instance, 10.9% of patients prescribed benzodiazepines reported cannabis use as compared with 7.3% among patients without a prescription for benzodiazepines (p < 0.01). Patients with neurologic/musculoskeletal medications such as antiepileptics also had a higher prevalence of cannabis use when compared with those without these prescriptions (13.6% vs. 7.6% respectively; p < 0.01) as did those who were prescribed muscle relaxants (10.3% vs. 7.5% respectively; p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities those prescribed medications for psychiatric (adjusted OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.4-1.7), respiratory (adjusted OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3), or neurologic conditions (adjusted OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.5) had increased odds of cannabis use compared with those not prescribed these medications.DiscussionThe prevalence of cannabis use among older adults attending PC clinics in a university-based healthcare system was higher among those prescribed medications, which may interact with cannabis. These findings suggest that key groups of older patients who may benefit from routine PC screening for cannabis use and brief advice.