Dataset Information

A QI Partnership to Decrease CT Use for Pediatric Appendicitis in the Community Hospital Setting.

ABSTRACT: The primary aim of this quality improvement initiative was to decrease the use of computerized tomography (CT) in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis in a community general emergency department (GED) system by 50% (from 32% to 16%) in 1 year.

Methods

Colleagues within a State Emergency Medical Service for Children (EMSC) community of practice formed the quality improvement team, representing multiple stakeholders across 3 independent institutions. The team generated project aims by reviewing baseline practice trends and implemented changes using the Model for Improvement. Ultrasound (US) use and nondiagnostic US rates served as process measures. Transfer and "over-transfer" rates served as balancing measures. Interventions included a GED pediatric appendicitis clinical pathway, US report templates, and case audit and feedback. Statistical process control tracked the main outcomes. Additionally, frontline GED providers shared perceptions of knowledge gains, practice changes, and teamwork.

Results

The 12-month baseline revealed a GED CT scan rate of 32%, a US rate of 63%, a nondiagnostic US rate of 77%, a transfer to a children's hospital rate of 23.5%, and an "over-transfer" rate of 0%. Project interventions achieved and sustained the primary aim by decreasing the CT scan rate to 4.5%. Frontline GED providers reported positive perceptions of knowledge gains and standardization of practice.

Conclusions

Engaging regional colleagues in a pediatric-specific quality improvement initiative significantly decreased CT scan use in children cared for in a community GED system. The emphasis on the community of practice facilitated by Emergency Medical Service for Children may guide future improvement work in the state and beyond.

SUBMITTER: Goldman MP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8476057 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceHospital care for children is becoming more concentrated, with interhospital transfer occurring more frequently even for common conditions. Condition-specific analysis is required to determine the value, costs, and consequences of this trend.ObjectivesTo describe the capabilities of transferring and receiving hospitals and to determine how often children transferred after an initial diagnosis of abdominal pain or appendicitis require higher levels of care.Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective cohort analysis using the 2 most recent available inpatient and emergency department administrative data sets from all acute care hospitals in California from 2010 to 2011 and Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from 2013 to 2014. Data were analyzed between February and June 2018. All patients younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of abdominal pain or appendicitis who underwent an interhospital transfer and whose care could be matched through unique identifiers were included.Main outcomes and measuresOutcomes after hospital transfers, classified into encounters with major surgical procedures, imaging diagnostics, and no major procedures. Pediatric Hospital Capability Index of transferring and receiving hospitals.ResultsThere were 465?143 pediatric hospital encounters for abdominal pain and appendicitis, including 53?517 inpatient admissions and 15?275 transfers. Among them, 4469 could be matched to encounters in receiving hospitals. The median (interquartile range) age of this cohort was 10 (7-14) years, with 54.8% female (2449 patients), 40.9% male (1830 patients), and 4.3% unreported sex (190 patients). The increase in capability at the receiving hospital compared with the transferring hospital was large (median [interquartile range] change in Pediatric Hospital Capability Index score, 0.70 [0.54-0.82]), with 9.2% of hospitals (57) with very high capability (Pediatric Hospital Capability Index score >0.77) receiving 80.8% of the total transfers (3610). Diagnostic imaging was undertaken in the care of 710 transferred patients (15.9%) and invasive procedures were performed in 2421 patients (54.2%), including 2153 appendectomies. No imaging or surgery was required in the care of 1338 transfers (29.9%).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, interfacility transfers of patients with appendicitis and abdominal pain were concentrated toward high-capability hospitals, and about 30% of patients were released without apparent intervention. These findings suggest an opportunity for improving care and decreasing cost through better interfacility coordination, such as standardized management protocols and telemedicine with high-capability hospitals. Further research is needed to identify similar opportunities among other common conditions.

Project description:PurposeAlbumin has been shown to be safe and effective in clinical practice for a wide variety of indications. The purpose of this medication use evaluation is to quantify the use of albumin in the community hospital setting based on indication and prescribing department.MethodsThis study is a retrospective, single-center, chart review over a 6-month period of 186 patients aged 18 and older who were treated with IV human albumin 5% or 25% at a single 202-bed community hospital setting from February 1, 2020, to August 1, 2020. A chart review was completed for each patient and the data collected included date of albumin administration, the ordering provider, the specialty of the provider, the indication for albumin as stated in the order, patient notes, crystalloid therapy use prior to albumin, albumin strength, the presence of acute or chronic renal, hepatic or respiratory disorders, and lab values denoting renal and hepatic function. Appropriate albumin use was determined utilizing criteria which included FDA labeled indications, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, and existing literature.ResultsA total of 186 patients received albumin 5% or 25% IV solution at least once during the study period. The study population was 52.2% female, and the average age was 68 years. Of the patients selected for the study, 23 (11.6%) had chronic hepatic disease, and 37 (18.7%) had chronic renal disease. The top indications for which albumin was administered were sepsis or septic shock (25.3%), hypotension or hypovolemia (19.4%), intra-dialytic hypotension (13.4%), fluid support in surgery (10.8%), and nephrosis or nephropathy (10.8%). The departments with highest albumin use during this study period were critical care (41%), nephrology (28%), and surgery (17%). Overall, albumin was used for an appropriate indication in 126 out of 186 patients (67.7%).ConclusionWe found that albumin was most utilized for sepsis and septic shock, hypovolemia and hypotension, and intradialytic hypotension in our community hospital setting and it was most frequently ordered by critical care, nephrology, and surgical departments. Further research could determine if this trend is seen in other community hospital settings.