Dataset Information

The efficacy and safety of levilimab in severely ill COVID-19 patients not requiring mechanical ventilation: results of a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III CORONA clinical study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective and design

The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III CORONA clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-6 receptor inhibitor levilimab (LVL) in subjects with severe COVID-19.

Subjects

The study included 217 patients. The eligible were men and non-pregnant women aged 18 years or older, hospitalized for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Treatment

206 subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive single subcutaneous administration of LVL 324 mg or placebo, both in combination with standard of care (SOC). 204 patients received allocated therapy. After the LVL/placebo administration in case of deterioration of symptoms, the investigator could perform a single open-label LVL 324 mg administration as the rescue therapy.

Methods

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained clinical improvement on the 7-category ordinal scale on Day 14. All efficacy data obtained after rescue therapy administration were considered missing. For primary efficacy analysis, all subjects with missing data were considered non-responders.

Results

63.1% and 42.7% of patients in the LVL and in the placebo groups, respectively, achieved sustained clinical improvement on Day 14 (P = .0017). The frequency of adverse drug reactions was comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

In patients with radiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, requiring or not oxygen therapy (but not ventilation) with no signs of other active infection administration of LVL + SOC results in an increase of sustained clinical improvement rate.

Trail registration

The trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04397562).

SUBMITTER: Lomakin NV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8479713 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Studying interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in the spring 2020 surge may help inform future pandemic management.ObjectivesTo compare outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 transferred to a tertiary referral center with increased surge capacity with patients admitted from the emergency department.Design setting participantsObservational cohort study of single center urban academic medical center ICUs. All patients admitted and discharged with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia who received invasive ventilation between March 17, 2020, and October 14, 2020.Main outcome and measuresDemographic and clinical variables were obtained from the electronic medical record. Patients were classified as emergency department admits or interhospital transfers. Regression models tested the association between transfer status and survival, adjusting for demographics and presentation severity.ResultsIn total, 298 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia were admitted to the ICU and received mechanical ventilation. Of these, 117 were transferred from another facility and 181 were admitted through the emergency department. Patients were primarily male (64%) and Black (38%) or Hispanic (45%). Transfer patients differed from emergency department admits in having English as a preferred language (71% vs 56%; p = 0.008) and younger age (median 57 vs 61 yr; p < 0.001). There were no differences in race/ethnicity or primary payor. Transfers were more likely to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (12% vs 3%; p = 0.004). Overall, 50 (43%) transferred patients and 78 (43%) emergency department admits died prior to discharge. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality or days from intubation to discharge between the two groups.Conclusions and relevanceIn a single-center retrospective cohort, no significant differences in hospital mortality or length of stay between interhospital transfers and emergency department admits were found. While more study is needed, this suggests that interhospital transfer of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 can be done safely and effectively.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Most prognostic studies in acute stroke patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation are outdated and have limitations such as single-center retrospective designs. We aimed to study the association of ICU admission factors, including the reason for intubation, with 1-year survival of acute stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS:We conducted a secondary data use analysis of a prospective multicenter database (14 ICUs) between 1997 and 2016 on consecutive ICU stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation at admission. We excluded patients with stroke of traumatic origin, subdural hematoma or cerebral venous thrombosis. The primary outcome was survival 1 year after ICU admission. Factors associated with the primary outcome were identified using a multivariable Cox model stratified on inclusion center. RESULTS:We identified 419 patients (age 68 [58-76] years, males 60%) with a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 4 [3-8] at admission. Stroke subtypes were acute ischemic stroke (AIS, 46%), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, 42%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH, 12%). At 1 year, 96 (23%) patients were alive. Factors independently associated with decreased 1-year survival were ICH and SAH stroke subtypes, a lower GCS score at admission, a higher non-neurological SOFA score. Conversely, patients receiving acute-phase therapy had improved 1-year survival. Intubation for acute respiratory failure or coma was associated with comparable survival hazard ratios, whereas intubation for seizure was not associated with a worse prognosis than for elective procedure. Survival did not improve over the study period, but patients included in the most recent period had more comorbidities and presented higher severity scores at admission. CONCLUSIONS:In acute stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the reason for intubation and the opportunity to receive acute-phase stroke therapy were independently associated with 1-year survival. These variables could assist in the decision process regarding the initiation of mechanical ventilation in acute stroke patients.

Project description:Lower oxygen consumption is associated with worse survival in septic shock and in other forms of critical illness. No treatment that increases oxygen extraction, a key determinant of oxygen consumption, has been found. Thiamine is required for aerobic metabolism, and deficiency is common in the critically ill.ObjectivesWe evaluated the effect of thiamine on oxygen consumption in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for an acute illness.DesignPhase II, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial.Setting and participantsICUs in a tertiary care hospital in the United States. Patients admitted to the ICU and requiring mechanical ventilation were screened for enrollment.InterventionsAfter enrollment, baseline measurement of oxygen consumption and baseline laboratories including lactate, central venous oxygen saturation, and pyruvate dehydrogenase, a single dose of 200 mg IV thiamine or placebo was administered. Oxygen consumption was then monitored for 6 additional hours and repeat laboratories were drawn at the end of the protocol.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the change in oxygen consumption. Analysis was done using linear regression with a first-order autoregressive variance-covariance structure to account for repeated measures within subjects. Secondary outcomes included change in lactate, central venous oxygen saturation, and pyruvate dehydrogenase quantity and activity.ResultsSixty-seven patients were enrolled. After excluding 11 patients due to inadequate quantity or quality of oxygen consumption data, 56 patients were included. There was no difference in change in oxygen consumption in the 6 hours after study drug. Results for secondary outcomes were similarly negative. In the prespecified subgroup of 18 thiamine deficient patients, there was a difference in the two oxygen consumption curves (p = 0.006), although no difference in median oxygen consumption or area under the curve.Conclusions and relevanceA single dose of IV thiamine did not alter oxygen consumption in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for acute illness.

Project description:BackgroundCritically ill patients have an increased requirement for vitamin C in sepsis and these patients have low levels of vitamin C. The researchers validated the efficacy of high-dose vitamin C intravenous infusion (IVI) in patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation.MethodsForty patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups (20 each) in a 1 : 1 ratio in accordance with the vitamin C treatment regimen: Group I (GI): patients received 1.5 g/6 h vitamin C in 50 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) IVI over 30 minutes for 4 consecutive days; Group II (GII): patients received 100 mg vitamin C/day as a first single dose in 50 ml of D5W IVI over 30 minutes and the other three subsequent doses were 50 ml of plain D5W IVI over 30 minutes for 4 consecutive days. Primary outcomes were the change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at day 7, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and the plasma vitamin C level. The glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, duration of vasopressor therapy, and 28-day mortality were secondary outcomes.ResultsThe change in SOFA score at day 7 showed a significant difference between GI and GII (p < 0.001). The incidence of early VAP was significantly lower in GI (p=0.044). Vitamin C levels showed a significant rise in GI at day 1 and day 4 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). GPX activity of day 4 and day 7 was significantly higher in GI (p=0.005 and p=0.014, respectively). CRP levels of day 4 and day 7 were significantly higher in GII (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant difference in 28-day mortality (p=0.038) and duration of vasopressor therapy (p=0.033) in GI compared to GII.ConclusionThe early use of high-dose vitamin C intravenous infusion in patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation in combination with the standard treatment for sepsis lowered the incidence of VAP, increased the antioxidant status, and improved the illness severity. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT04029675).