Dataset Information

How-I-do-it: laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy utilizing a cranial approach to the middle hepatic vein and Laennec's capsule.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Laparoscopic anatomic liver resection is technically demanding, given the need to safely isolate the Glissonean pedicles and expose the hepatic veins (HVs) on the liver parenchyma cut surface. Laennec's capsule is observed around the Glissonean pedicles and root of the HVs. However, its existence, particularly on the peripheral side of the HVs, remains controversial. Herein, we describe Laennec's capsule-related histopathological findings around the HVs and a safe laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy utilizing Laennec's capsule.

Methods

The extrahepatic Glissonean approach was performed by connecting Gates II and III, in accordance with Sugioka's Gate theory. Liver parenchymal transection commenced along the demarcation line, which is between the medial and lateral sections, and the G4 was dissected during transection. Subsequently, via the outer-Laennec approach, the middle hepatic vein (MHV) was exposed from the root side in cranial view, while Laennec's capsule was preserved. Parenchymal transection was completed while connecting the MHV with the demarcation line. We obtained the membrane surrounding the HVs and performed histopathological examinations.

Results

Six patients underwent laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy from February 2012 to November 2020. There were no cases involving complications (Clavien-Dindo classification; grade II or higher), open-surgery conversion, transfusion, or surgery-related death. The histopathological findings showed Laennec's capsule surrounding both the trunk of the major HVs and the peripheral side of the HVs.

Conclusions

A cranial approach to the major HVs utilizing Laennec's capsule is a feasible and advantageous procedure for laparoscopic left medial sectionectomy. We propose that Laennec's capsule surrounds the entire length of the HVs.

SUBMITTER: Hanzawa S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8481215 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough laparoscopic liver resection has become the standard for minor resections, evidence is lacking for more complex resections such as the right posterior sectionectomy (RPS). We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between laparoscopic (LRPS) and open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS).MethodsAn international multicenter retrospective study comparing patients undergoing LRPS or ORPS (January 2007-December 2018) was performed. Patients were matched based on propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was major complication rate defined as Accordion ≥ 3 grade. Secondary endpoints included blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS) and resection status. A sensitivity analysis was done excluding the first 10 LRPS patients of each center to correct for the learning curve. Additionally, possible risk factors were explored for operative time, blood loss and LOS.ResultsOverall, 399 patients were included from 9 centers from 6 European countries of which 150 LRPS could be matched to 150 ORPS. LRPS was associated with a shorter operative time [235 (195-285) vs. 247 min (195-315) p = 0.004], less blood loss [260 (188-400) vs. 400 mL (280-550) p = 0.009] and a shorter LOS [5 (4-7) vs. 8 days (6-10), p = 0.002]. Major complication rate [n = 8 (5.3%) vs. n = 9 (6.0%) p = 1.00] and R0 resection rate [144 (96.0%) vs. 141 (94.0%), p = 0.607] did not differ between LRPS and ORPS, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed similar findings in the previous mentioned outcomes. In multivariable regression analysis blood loss was significantly associated with the open approach, higher ASA classification and malignancy as diagnosis. For LOS this was the open approach and a malignancy.ConclusionThis international multicenter propensity score-matched study showed an advantage in favor of LRPS in selected patients as compared to ORPS in terms of operative time, blood loss and LOS without differences in major complications and R0 resection rate.