Dataset Information

Persistence of left atrial abnormalities despite left atrial volume normalization after successful ablation of atrial fibrillation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Left atrial volume index (LAVI) of >34 mL/m² is the cutoff value for identifying an enlarged left atrium. The definition of left atrial (LA) reverse remodeling after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is undetermined. We hypothesized that patients with LA dilatation who achieve normal LA volume (LAVI<34 mL/m²) after AF ablation have better long-term outcomes than those who do not. Furthermore, we investigated whether patients with a normal LA volume can also achieve normal LA function with AF ablation.

Methods

We enrolled 140 AF patients with baseline LAVI of ≥34 mL/m², without AF recurrence for 1 year after the initial AF ablation. We acquired conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiographic parameters within 24 hour and at 1 year after the procedure. To define the normal range of LA function, age- and sex-matched controls without a history of AF were also enrolled.

Results

After restoration of sinus rhythm, LA structural and functional parameters significantly improved, and 75 patients (54%) had normal LA volume. During a median follow-up of 44 (31-61) months, 32 patients (23%) experienced a late recurrence of AF (AF recurrence >1 year). Patients who achieved normal LA volume after AF ablation had fewer late recurrences than those who did not (P < .01). However, LA abnormalities, especially LA dysfunction, persisted in AF patients even when the LA volume was normalized compared with controls.

Conclusion

Patients who achieved normal LA volume had better long-term outcomes of AF ablation than those who did not; however, LA abnormalities persisted even after successful ablation of AF.

SUBMITTER: Kawakami H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8485788 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) may reflect a subclinical cardiomyopathy that persists after sinus rhythm (SR) restoration, providing a substrate for AF recurrence. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of restoring SR by catheter ablation on left ventricular (LV) function and energetics in patients with AF but no significant comorbidities. METHODS:Fifty-three patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF and without significant valvular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, coronary artery disease, uncontrolled thyroid disease, systemic inflammatory disease, diabetes mellitus, or obstructive sleep apnea (ie, lone AF) undergoing ablation and 25 matched control subjects in SR were investigated. Magnetic resonance imaging quantified LV ejection fraction (LVEF), peak systolic circumferential strain (PSCS), and left atrial volumes and function, whereas phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy evaluated ventricular energetics (ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP). AF burden was determined before and after ablation by 7-day Holter monitoring; intermittent ECG event monitoring was also undertaken after ablation to investigate for asymptomatic AF recurrence. RESULTS:Before ablation, both LV function and energetics were significantly impaired in patients compared with control subjects (LVEF, 61% [interquartile range (IQR), 52%-65%] versus 71% [IQR, 69%-73%], P<0.001; PSCS, -15% [IQR, -11 to -18%] versus -18% [IQR, -17% to -19%], P=0.002; ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP, 1.81±0.35 versus 2.05±0.29, P=0.004). As expected, patients also had dilated and impaired left atria compared with control subjects (all P<0.001). Early after ablation (1-4 days), LVEF and PSCS improved in patients recovering SR from AF (LVEF, 7.0±10%, P=0.005; PSCS, -3.5±4.3%, P=0.001) but were unchanged in those in SR during both assessments (both P=NS). At 6 to 9 months after ablation, AF burden reduced significantly (from 54% [IQR, 1.5%-100%] to 0% [IQR 0%-0.1%]; P<0.001). However, LVEF and PSCS did not improve further (both P=NS) and remained impaired compared with control subjects (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant improvement in atrial function from before ablation (P=NS), and this remained lower than in control subjects (P<0.001). The ratio of phosphocreatine to ATP was unaffected by heart rhythm during assessment and AF burden before ablation (both P=NS). It was unchanged after ablation (P=0.57), remaining lower than in control subjects regardless of both recovery of SR and freedom from recurrent AF (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with lone AF have impaired myocardial energetics and subtle LV dysfunction, which do not normalize after ablation. These findings suggest that AF may be the consequence (rather than the cause) of an occult cardiomyopathy, which persists despite a significant reduction in AF burden after ablation.

Project description:PurposeTo determine whether left ventricular (LV) extracellular volume (ECV) expansion is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) or AF-mediated LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) while minimizing the influence of biologic and imaging methodologic confounders.Materials and methodsThis study examined the prevalence of LV ECV expansion in 137 patients with AF (mean age, 62 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 92 male patients and 45 female patients; 83 paroxysmal and 54 persistent) who underwent preablation cardiovascular MRI. Biologic confounders were minimized by measuring the ECV fraction and excluding patients with severe LV hypertrophy, defined as wall thickness greater than 1.5 cm. Imaging confounders were minimized by using an arrhythmia-insensitive-rapid (AIR) cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence. Other cardiac functional parameters, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area, were assessed using cine cardiovascular MRI. A substudy was conducted in 32 patients with no AF (mean age, 54 years ± 16) in sinus rhythm to establish control values and convert these values between the AIR sequence and literature-based modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) values.ResultsThe mean ECV was not significantly different (P > .05) between patients with AF with a normal LVEF (24.5% ± 2.8; n = 107), patients with AF with LVSD (24.5% ± 2.5; n = 30), and patients with no AF (24.4% ± 3.8; n = 32), but there was a significant interaction between ECV and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P = .045). Compared with the literature data obtained from healthy control patients scanned using MOLLI, 99.3% of patients with AF had ECV below the fibrosis cutoff point (32.8% when converted from MOLLI T1 mapping to AIR T1 mapping), including a subset of patients with AF (n = 28) with low CHA2DS2-VASc score (0/1 for men/women).ConclusionStudy results suggest that an LV ECV expansion is not associated with AF or AF-mediated LVSD. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Stillman in this issue.