Somatic variant analysis of linked-reads sequencing data with Lancet.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Summary
We present a new version of the popular somatic variant caller, Lancet, that supports the analysis of linked-reads sequencing data. By seamlessly integrating barcodes and haplotype read assignments within the colored De Bruijn graph local-assembly framework, Lancet computes a barcode-aware coverage and identifies variants that disagree with the local haplotype structure.Availability and implementation
Lancet is implemented in C++ and available for academic and non-commercial research purposes as an open-source package at https://github.com/nygenome/lancet.Supplementary information
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
SUBMITTER: Musunuri R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8487631 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:SummaryLinked-read sequencing generates synthetic long reads which are useful for the detection and analysis of structural variants (SVs). The software associated with 10× Genomics linked-read sequencing, Long Ranger, generates the essential output files (BAM, VCF, SV BEDPE) necessary for downstream analyses. However, to perform downstream analyses requires the user to customize their own tools to handle the unique features of linked-read sequencing data. Here, we describe gemtools, a collection of tools for the downstream and in-depth analysis of SVs from linked-read data. Gemtools uses the barcoded aligned reads and the Megabase-scale phase blocks to determine haplotypes of SV breakpoints and delineate complex breakpoint configurations at the resolution of single DNA molecules. The gemtools package is a suite of tools that provides the user with the flexibility to perform basic functions on their linked-read sequencing output in order to address even more questions.Availability and implementationThe gemtools package is freely available for download at: https://github.com/sgreer77/gemtools.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC6821325 | biostudies-literature
Project description:X-linked Alport syndrome (XLAS) is a progressive, hereditary nephropathy. Although men with XLAS usually develop end-stage renal disease before 30 years of age, some men show a milder phenotype and develop end-stage renal disease later in life. However, the molecular mechanisms associated with this milder phenotype have not been fully identified. We genetically diagnosed 186 patients with suspected XLAS between January 2006 and August 2014. Genetic examination involved: (1) extraction and analysis of genomic DNA using PCR and direct sequencing using Sanger's method and (2) next-generation sequencing to detect variant allele frequencies. We identified somatic mosaic variants in the type VI collagen, ?5 gene (COL4A5) in four patients. Interestingly, two of these four patients with variant frequencies in kidney biopsies or urinary sediment cells of ?50% showed hematuria and moderate proteinuria, whereas the other two with variant frequencies of <50% were asymptomatic or only had hematuria. De novo variants can occur even in asymptomatic male cases of XLAS resulting in mosaicism, with important implications for genetic counseling. This is the first study to show a tendency between the variant allele frequency and disease severity in male XLAS patients with somatic mosaic variants in COL4A5. Although this is a very rare status of somatic mosaicism, further analysis is needed to show this correlation in a larger population.
| S-EPMC4755365 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Somatic mutation phasing informs our understanding of cancer-related events, like driver mutations. We generated linked-read whole genome sequencing data for 23 samples across disease stages from 14 multiple myeloma (MM) patients and systematically assigned somatic mutations to haplotypes using linked-reads. Here, we report the reconstructed cancer haplotypes and phase blocks from several MM samples and show how phase block length can be extended by integrating samples from the same individual. We also uncover phasing information in genes frequently mutated in MM, including DIS3, HIST1H1E, KRAS, NRAS, and TP53, phasing 79.4% of 20,705 high-confidence somatic mutations. In some cases, this enabled us to interpret clonal evolution models at higher resolution using pairs of phased somatic mutations. For example, our analysis of one patient suggested that two NRAS hotspot mutations occurred on the same haplotype but were independent events in different subclones. Given sufficient tumor purity and data quality, our framework illustrates how haplotype-aware analysis of somatic mutations in cancer can be beneficial for some cancer cases.
| S-EPMC11326269 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Next generation sequencing is extensively applied to catalogue somatic mutations in cancer, in research settings and increasingly in clinical settings for molecular diagnostics, guiding therapy decisions. Somatic variant callers perform paired comparisons of sequencing data from cancer tissue and matched normal tissue in order to detect somatic mutations. The advent of many new somatic variant callers creates a need for comparison and validation of the tools, as no de facto standard for detection of somatic mutations exists and only limited comparisons have been reported. We have performed a comprehensive evaluation using exome sequencing and targeted deep sequencing data of paired tumor-normal samples from five breast cancer patients to evaluate the performance of nine publicly available somatic variant callers: EBCall, Mutect, Seurat, Shimmer, Indelocator, Somatic Sniper, Strelka, VarScan 2 and Virmid for the detection of single nucleotide mutations and small deletions and insertions. We report a large variation in the number of calls from the nine somatic variant callers on the same sequencing data and highly variable agreement. Sequencing depth had markedly diverse impact on individual callers, as for some callers, increased sequencing depth highly improved sensitivity. For SNV calling, we report EBCall, Mutect, Virmid and Strelka to be the most reliable somatic variant callers for both exome sequencing and targeted deep sequencing. For indel calling, EBCall is superior due to high sensitivity and robustness to changes in sequencing depths.
| S-EPMC4803342 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Linked-read sequencing enables greatly improves haplotype assembly over standard paired-end analysis. The detection of mosaic single-nucleotide variants benefits from haplotype assembly when the model is informed by the mapping between constituent reads and linked reads. Samovar evaluates haplotype-discordant reads identified through linked-read sequencing, thus enabling phasing and mosaic variant detection across the entire genome. Samovar trains a random forest model to score candidate sites using a dataset that considers read quality, phasing, and linked-read characteristics. Samovar calls mosaic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within a single sample with accuracy comparable with what previously required trios or matched tumor/normal pairs and outperforms single-sample mosaic variant callers at minor allele frequency 5%-50% with at least 30X coverage. Samovar finds somatic variants in both tumor and normal whole-genome sequencing from 13 pediatric cancer cases that can be corroborated with high recall with whole exome sequencing. Samovar is available open-source at https://github.com/cdarby/samovar under the MIT license.
| S-EPMC6609817 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Long-read sequencing allows analyses of single nucleic-acid molecules and produces sequences in the order of tens to hundreds kilobases. Its application to whole-genome analyses allows identification of complex genomic structural-variants (SVs) with unprecedented resolution. SV identification, however, requires complex computational methods, based on either read-depth or intra- and inter-alignment signatures approaches, which are limited by size or type of SVs. Moreover, most currently available tools only detect germline variants, thus requiring separate computation of sample pairs for comparative analyses. To overcome these limits, we developed a novel tool (Germline And SOmatic structuraL varIants detectioN and gEnotyping; GASOLINE) that groups SV signatures using a sophisticated clustering procedure based on a modified reciprocal overlap criterion, and is designed to identify germline SVs, from single samples, and somatic SVs from paired test and control samples. GASOLINE is a collection of Perl, R and Fortran codes, it analyzes aligned data in BAM format and produces VCF files with statistically significant somatic SVs. Germline or somatic analysis of 30[Formula: see text] sequencing coverage experiments requires 4-5 h with 20 threads. GASOLINE outperformed currently available methods in the detection of both germline and somatic SVs in synthetic and real long-reads datasets. Notably, when applied on a pair of metastatic melanoma and matched-normal sample, GASOLINE identified five genuine somatic SVs that were missed using five different sequencing technologies and state-of-the art SV calling approaches. Thus, GASOLINE identifies germline and somatic SVs with unprecedented accuracy and resolution, outperforming currently available state-of-the-art WGS long-reads computational methods.
| S-EPMC10682169 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a powerful tool for genome-wide expression profiling of biological samples with the advantage of high-throughput and high resolution. There are many existing algorithms nowadays for quantifying expression levels and detecting differential gene expression, but none of them takes the misaligned reads that are mapped to non-exonic regions into account. We developed a novel algorithm, XBSeq, where a statistical model was established based on the assumption that observed signals are the convolution of true expression signals and sequencing noises. The mapped reads in non-exonic regions are considered as sequencing noises, which follows a Poisson distribution. Given measureable observed and noise signals from RNA-seq data, true expression signals, assuming governed by the negative binomial distribution, can be delineated and thus the accurate detection of differential expressed genes.ResultsWe implemented our novel XBSeq algorithm and evaluated it by using a set of simulated expression datasets under different conditions, using a combination of negative binomial and Poisson distributions with parameters derived from real RNA-seq data. We compared the performance of our method with other commonly used differential expression analysis algorithms. We also evaluated the changes in true and false positive rates with variations in biological replicates, differential fold changes, and expression levels in non-exonic regions. We also tested the algorithm on a set of real RNA-seq data where the common and different detection results from different algorithms were reported.ConclusionsIn this paper, we proposed a novel XBSeq, a differential expression analysis algorithm for RNA-seq data that takes non-exonic mapped reads into consideration. When background noise is at baseline level, the performance of XBSeq and DESeq are mostly equivalent. However, our method surpasses DESeq and other algorithms with the increase of non-exonic mapped reads. Only in very low read count condition XBSeq had a slightly higher false discovery rate, which may be improved by adjusting the background noise effect in this situation. Taken together, by considering non-exonic mapped reads, XBSeq can provide accurate expression measurement and thus detect differential expressed genes even in noisy conditions.
| S-EPMC4474535 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MotivationNext-generation sequencing technology is transitioning quickly from research labs to clinical settings. The diagnosis and treatment selection for many acquired and autosomal conditions necessitate a method for accurately detecting somatic and germline variants.ResultsWe have developed Pisces, a rapid, versatile and accurate small-variant calling suite designed for somatic and germline amplicon sequencing applications. Accuracy is achieved by four distinct modules, each incorporating a number of novel algorithmic strategies.Availability and implementationPisces is distributed under an open source license and can be downloaded from https://github.com/Illumina/Pisces. Pisces is available on the BaseSpace™ SequenceHub. It is distributed on Illumina sequencing platforms such as the MiSeq™ and is included in the Praxis™ Extended RAS Panel test which was recently approved by the FDA.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC6499249 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cancer genomic analysis requires accurate identification of somatic variants in sequencing data. Manual review to refine somatic variant calls is required as a final step after automated processing. However, manual variant refinement is time-consuming, costly, poorly standardized, and non-reproducible. Here, we systematized and standardized somatic variant refinement using a machine learning approach. The final model incorporates 41,000 variants from 440 sequencing cases. This model accurately recapitulated manual refinement labels for three independent testing sets (13,579 variants) and accurately predicted somatic variants confirmed by orthogonal validation sequencing data (212,158 variants). The model improves on manual somatic refinement by reducing bias on calls otherwise subject to high inter-reviewer variability.
| S-EPMC6428590 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeFollowing automated variant calling, manual review of aligned read sequences is required to identify a high-quality list of somatic variants. Despite widespread use in analyzing sequence data, methods to standardize manual review have not been described, resulting in high inter- and intralab variability.MethodsThis manual review standard operating procedure (SOP) consists of methods to annotate variants with four different calls and 19 tags. The calls indicate a reviewer's confidence in each variant and the tags indicate commonly observed sequencing patterns and artifacts that inform the manual review call. Four individuals were asked to classify variants prior to, and after, reading the SOP and accuracy was assessed by comparing reviewer calls with orthogonal validation sequencing.ResultsAfter reading the SOP, average accuracy in somatic variant identification increased by 16.7% (p value = 0.0298) and average interreviewer agreement increased by 12.7% (p value < 0.001). Manual review conducted after reading the SOP did not significantly increase reviewer time.ConclusionThis SOP supports and enhances manual somatic variant detection by improving reviewer accuracy while reducing the interreviewer variability for variant calling and annotation.
| S-EPMC6450397 | biostudies-literature