Five Key Papers About Emergency Department Fall Evaluation: A Curated Collection for Emergency Physicians.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kim SH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8489554 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionTeam collaboration is an essential for success both within academics and the clinical environment. Often, team collaboration is not explicitly taught during medical school or even residency, and must be learned during one's early career. In this article, we aim to summarize five key papers about team collaboration for early career clinician educators.MethodsWe conducted a consensus-building process among the writing team to generate a list of key papers that describe the importance or significance of team collaboration, seeking input from social media sources. The authors then used a three-round voting methodology akin to a Delphi study to determine the most important papers from the initially generated list.ResultsThe five most important papers on the topic of team collaboration, as determined by this mixed group of junior faculty members and faculty developers, are presented in this paper. For each included publication, a summary was provided along with its relevance to junior faculty members and faculty developers.ConclusionFive key papers about team collaboration are presented in this publication. These papers provide a foundational background to help junior faculty members with collaborating in teams both clinically and academically. This list may also inform senior faculty and faculty developers about the needs of junior faculty members.
| S-EPMC5305141 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Three million US emergency department (ED) visits occur for falls each year. The mortality of falls is increasing and only one fourth of older adults report their fall to their primary care provider, suggesting that valuable preventative opportunities are missed. A fall prevention intervention initiated in the ED immediately after a fall has the potential to reduce subsequent falls, but ED providers lack the time and resources to complete fall risk assessments on their patients. GAPcare, the Geriatric Acute and Post-Acute Fall Prevention Intervention, was developed to address this need. Methods:GAPcare combines a pharmacist-led medication therapy management intervention with a physical therapist (PT)-administered fall risk assessment and disposition planning. A key objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to create a patient and caregiver-centric intervention. This manuscript reports on the results of the qualitative companion study in which we conducted in-depth interviews with patients and caregivers to determine their lived experience with the intervention, barriers and perceived impact of the intervention, and to obtain their recommendations for the improvement of GAPcare. We recruited patients and their caregivers from the RCT into 30 minutes interviews in the participants' home singularly or in dyads (patient and caregiver together). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and double-coded. We used applied thematic analysis to guide the data analysis. Results:We conducted 20 interviews; patients (n=12), caregivers (n=11). Patients were on average 83 years old, 7/12 were female, and 2/14 had cognitive impairment. 6/11 caregiver interviews were in reference to a patient with dementia. Patients and caregivers reported they embraced the experience of motivational interviewing elements, citing its collaborative and inclusive nature. Caregivers in particular said they felt that PT helped their loved one recognize and overcome functional limitations. Barriers included lack of time, the burden of coordinating multiple service providers once home, and concerns that PT would be ineffective or increase pain. Areas for improvement included better screening for those who would benefit from the individual components (pharmacy vs. PT consultation), improving identification of GAPcare pharmacists and PTs vs. other hospital staff in the ED, and expanding the role of GAPcare personnel to provide culturally competent, comprehensive care to improve adherence and medication education. Conclusions:We found that GAPcare, a new team-based intervention for fall prevention in the ED, was welcomed by patients and their caregivers. Several suggestions to improve the intervention were made that will inform the screening, content, and communication with patients in GAPcare.
| S-EPMC7189708 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:The shortage of emergency drugs in China is severe. This study aimed to characterize emergency drug shortages in China and to measure their effects. METHODS:An online questionnaire based on a literature review was sent to emergency department physicians in Chinese secondary and tertiary hospitals from November 2016 to February 2017. The survey asked physicians questions about their experiences with emergency drug shortages. RESULTS:In total, 236 physicians from 29 provinces participated in the survey. According to their responses, 90.7% of the respondents experienced drug shortages during the last year. More than half of the physicians (65.7%) reported that drug shortages occurred at least once a month. Hospitals in the eastern and western regions of China had more emergency drugs in shortage than hospitals in central China, especially those with many inpatient beds (?800). In addition, the shortage situation was more serious in secondary hospitals than in tertiary hospitals. More respondents agreed that original medicines, injections, essential medicines, medicines without alternative agents and cheap medicines were more susceptible to shortages than generics, oral medicines, nonessential medicines, medicines with alternative agents and expensive medicines, respectively. Most respondents thought that drug shortages always, often or sometimes affected patients [delayed therapy (62.6%), longer rescue and recovery times (58.9%) and higher costs (58.7%)] and physicians [inconvenience (81.0%), higher pressure (76.5%) and harm to patient-doctor relationships (72%)] and compromised hospital reputations (55.1%). CONCLUSIONS:The shortage of emergency drugs in China is serious, especially in secondary hospitals located in eastern and western China. Emergency drug shortages have significant effects on patients and physicians.
| S-EPMC6177176 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectivesTo examine the prevalence of effort-reward imbalance and explore its associated factors among emergency department physicians in China.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Chinese emergency department in 2018. A total of 10,457 emergency department physicians completed a structured questionnaire containing demographic characteristics, work-related data, and effort-reward imbalance scale. All the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and stepwise logistic regression.ResultsThe prevalence of effort-reward imbalance was 78.39% among emergency department physicians in China. The results showed that the male emergency department physicians with a bachelor's degree, an intermediate title, long years of service, a high frequency of night shift, and who suffered workplace violence were at a higher risk of effort-reward imbalance. In contrast, physicians with higher monthly income and perceived adequate staff were associated with a lower risk of effort-reward imbalance.ConclusionsThe situation of effort-reward imbalance was serious among emergency department physicians in China. Administrators should pay more attention to key groups and take measures from the perspectives of effort and reward to improve the effort-reward imbalance in emergency department physicians.
| S-EPMC8858846 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Around 42,000 children suffer from severe sepsis each year in the US alone, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality and billion dollar expenditures in the US healthcare system. Sepsis recognition is a clinical challenge in children. Biomarkers are needed to tailor appropriate antimicrobial therapies and improve risk stratification. The goal of this study was to determine if gene expression profiles from peripheral blood were associated with pathogen type and sepsis severity in children treated for suspected sepsis.
2020-01-01 | GSE119217 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundMachine learning is increasingly used for risk stratification in health care. Achieving accurate predictive models do not improve outcomes if they cannot be translated into efficacious intervention. Here we examine the potential utility of automated risk stratification and referral intervention to screen older adults for fall risk after emergency department (ED) visits.ObjectiveThis study evaluated several machine learning methodologies for the creation of a risk stratification algorithm using electronic health record data and estimated the effects of a resultant intervention based on algorithm performance in test data.MethodsData available at the time of ED discharge were retrospectively collected and separated into training and test datasets. Algorithms were developed to predict the outcome of a return visit for fall within 6 months of an ED index visit. Models included random forests, AdaBoost, and regression-based methods. We evaluated models both by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, also referred to as area under the curve (AUC), and by projected clinical impact, estimating number needed to treat (NNT) and referrals per week for a fall risk intervention.ResultsThe random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.78, with slightly lower performance in regression-based models. Algorithms with similar performance, when evaluated by AUC, differed when placed into a clinical context with the defined task of estimated NNT in a real-world scenario.ConclusionThe ability to translate the results of our analysis to the potential tradeoff between referral numbers and NNT offers decisionmakers the ability to envision the effects of a proposed intervention before implementation.
| S-EPMC6590914 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveOlder adult falls are a national issue comprising 3 million emergency department (ED) visits and significant mortality. We sought to understand whether ED revisits and hospitalisations for fallers differed from non-fall patients through a secondary analysis of a longitudinal, statewide cohort of patients.DesignWe performed a secondary analysis using the non-public Patient Discharge Database and the ED data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. This is a 5-year, longitudinal observational dataset, which was used to assess outcomes for fallers and non-fall patients, defined as anyone who did not carry a fall diagnosis during this time period.Setting2005-2010 non-public Patient Discharge Database and the ED Data from the state of California.ParticipantsOlder adults 65 years and older MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: ED revisits and hospitalisations for fallers and non-fall patients.ResultsPatients who came to the ED with an index visit of a fall were more likely to be discharged home after their fall (61.1% vs 45.0%, p<0.001). Fallers who were discharged or hospitalised after their index visit were more likely to come back to the ED for a fall related complaint compared with non-fallers (median time: 151 days vs 352 days, p<0.001 and hospitalised: 45 days vs 119 days, p<0.01) and fallers who were initially discharged also returned to the ED sooner for a non-fall related complaint (median time: 325 days vs 352 days, p<0.001).ConclusionFall patients tend to be discharged home more often after their index visit, but returned to the ED sooner compared with their non-fall counterparts. Given a faller's rates of ED revisits and hospitalisations, EDs should consider a fall as a poor prognostic indicator for future healthcare utilisation.
| S-EPMC7733199 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Information about recruitment and retention factors and quality of work life (QWL) in rural emergency departments (EDs) is limited. A pilot study was used to determine the feasibility of a large-scale study of these variables in Quebec EDs.Two EDs, approximately 10,000 and 30,000 patients per year respectively, were selected as convenience samples. An online survey containing the Quality of Work Life Systemic Inventory (QWLSI; 34 items) and the Recruitment and Retention Factors Questionnaire (39 items) was sent to ED nurses and physicians of these two EDs. Descriptive statistics of percentage, mean and standard deviation and correlations were used to analyse the data.Forty out of 64 eligible workers (62%) gave their consent to participate, but only 20 had completed both questionnaires. Participants' mean age was 42 years (SD = 11.6). The average participants satisfaction with their access to continuing education was low (Mean = 1.6, SD = 0.8). However, their satisfaction with technical resources (Mean = 2.4, SD = 0.7), pre-hospital and inter-hospital transfer services (Mean = 2.5, SD = 0.6), relationships with colleagues (Mean = 2.7, SD = 0.6) and managers (Mean = 2.2, SD = 0.7), work-life balance (Mean = 2.4, SD = 0.6) and emergency patient access to other departments (Mean = 3.7, SD = 0.6) was in the average. The impact of several aspects of the rural environment (e.g. tranquility) on quality of life was also in the average (Mean = 2.5, SD = 0.7). QWL was in the average, excepted subscale 'support offered to employee' for which the QWL was lower.Data collection was difficult and the larger study will require strategies to improve recruitment such as a paper alternative. The study showed globally good recruitment and retention factors and QWL for these ED nurses and physicians. These results will help hospital administrations better plan initiatives aimed at improving retention and QWL.
| S-EPMC4392803 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposePressures related to the COVID-19 pandemic have created the need to develop innovative ways to deliver mental health care, especially for urgent needs. After the launch of a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) Virtual Care service, we aimed to evaluate pediatric ED physicians' experiences with the use of ED virtual care for mental health assessments.MethodsThis mixed-methods study was conducted at a pediatric academic health center in Ontario, Canada. Pediatric ED physicians who conducted ED virtual mental health assessments from May to December 2020 were eligible. Participants completed a 22-question novel survey and were invited to participate in a focus group. Descriptive and thematic analyses were used to analyze the data.ResultsTwenty-nine physicians provided mental health services through the ED virtual care platform. Twenty-five physicians (86% response rate) completed the survey and 3 (10%) participated in a focus group. While many agreed that virtual care benefits patients (67%), key barriers identified included time constraints, lack of mental health clinician support, and uncertainty around the pediatric ED physicians' role in these types of assessments. Despite these barriers, physicians recognized the potential benefit of the ED virtual care service for mental health assessments and were largely amenable to improving this process should mental health support be available.ConclusionsWhile many physicians agreed that there is a potential benefit of the ED virtual care platform for urgent mental health assessments, time constraints and lack of confidence in providing satisfactory virtual mental health care with minimal mental health support limited its acceptability. These findings can inform the future implementation of mental health services using an innovative virtual ED platform.
| S-EPMC9903269 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPain is a subjective complaint that comprises a vast majority of emergency department (ED) visits. Owing to its subjectivity, pain reporting is prone to variations that could impact patient care. We aimed to determine the extent of differences in pain rating-scores between patients and their physicians in the ED and impact on patient satisfaction.MethodsA prospective cross-sectional sample of eligible patients was recruited from two centers in Saudi Arabia. Pain scorings were performed using validated online questionnaires during patients' ED stay.ResultsPain rating scores by physicians was lower than that by patients (6.3 ± 2.0 versus 7.0 ± 3.1, p = 0.004). Additionally, severe pain rating (8-10 rating) was given less frequently by physicians compared with that by patients (26.0% versus 48.1%, p = 0.004). Comparing the ratings by physicians with those by patients, underestimation was observed in 70.1%, overestimation in 16.9%, and matching rating in 13.0% cases. The most frequent analgesic medication administered was paracetamol (79.2%), followed by diclofenac (26.0%), morphine (10.4%), and ketorolac (9.1%). The medications were administered mainly intravenously (87.0%) and, to a lesser extent, intramuscularly (31.2%). Majority of patients (62.5%) reported not to have sufficient pain relief after treatment.ConclusionMost physicians tend to underestimate the level of pain perceived by their patients, which often leads to under-treatment and lower patient satisfaction. The present study revealed a significant difference in pain ratings between patients and physicians.
| S-EPMC9667246 | biostudies-literature