Dataset Information

The MRI posterior drawer test to assess posterior cruciate ligament functionality and knee joint laxity.

ABSTRACT: Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of joints is limited to mere morphologic evaluation and fails to directly visualize joint or ligament function. In this controlled laboratory study, we show that knee joint functionality may be quantified in situ and as a function of graded posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-deficiency by combining MRI and standardized loading. 11 human knee joints underwent MRI under standardized posterior loading in the unloaded and loaded (147 N) configurations and in the intact, partially, and completely PCL-injured conditions. For each specimen, configuration, and condition, 3D joint models were implemented to analyse joint kinematics based on 3D Euclidean vectors and their projections on the Cartesian planes. Manual 2D measurements served as reference. With increasing PCL deficiency, vector projections increased significantly in the anteroposterior dimension under loading and manual measurements demonstrated similar patterns of change. Consequently, if combined with advanced image post-processing, stress MRI is a powerful diagnostic adjunct to evaluate ligament functionality and joint laxity in multiple dimensions and may have a role in differentiating PCL injury patterns, therapeutic decision-making, and treatment monitoring.

SUBMITTER: Wollschlager LM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8490383 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe accuracy of existing devices for measuring knee laxity is adversely affected by examiner reliability.PurposeTo compare the accuracy of a novel automatic knee arthrometer (AKA) to that of the KT-2000 arthrometer for measuring knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures.Study designCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.MethodsWe measured anterior displacement and the anterior displacement difference (ADD) at 134 N of anterior force in 221 healthy volunteers and 200 patients with ACL ruptures. All trials were performed by the same 2 examiners. We first analyzed the effects of examiner, side assessed, and device type using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), t test, and F test. We then used the receiver operating characteristic curve to compare the diagnostic value of the measurements between devices.ResultsIn repeated measurements for a single healthy volunteer, there were no differences in the variance of the measurements between sides according to the AKA (standard deviation of right vs left knee for examiner A: 0.43 vs 0.58 mm, respectively [P = .39]; for examiner B: 0.49 vs 0.77 mm, respectively [P = .81]), while the KT-2000 measurements showed differences (standard deviation of right vs left knee for examiner A: 1.47 vs 0.80 mm, respectively [P = .02]; for examiner B: 1.78 vs 0.91 mm, respectively [P = .01]). The ADD assessed by the AKA was not significantly different between examiners A and B (0.50 vs 0.75 mm, respectively; P = .27; ICC = 0.83), but the KT-2000 showed a difference (1.07 vs 2.01 mm, respectively; P = .01; ICC = 0.55). The ADD of 20 healthy volunteers assessed by the AKA was less than that by the KT-2000 (0.98 vs 1.41 mm, respectively; P = .04). When comparing the diagnostic value of the 2 devices in the sample of 200 patients with ACL ruptures and 200 healthy controls, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the AKA was larger than that for the KT-2000 (0.93 vs 0.87, respectively; P ≤ .01), and the threshold values were 1.75 and 2.73 mm, respectively.ConclusionThe AKA can be used to determine the degree of knee laxity in ACL injuries and to provide indications for treatment.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study was aimed to utilize a modified anterior drawer test (MADT) to detect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and investigate its accuracy compares with three traditional tests.MethodsFour hundred patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2015 and September 2017 preoperatively to undergo knee arthroscopic surgeries. The MADT, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test were used in the outpatient clinical setting and were compared statistically for their accuracy in terms of ACL ruptures, with arthroscopic findings as the gold standard.ResultsThe prevalence of ACL ruptures in this study was 37.0%. The MADT demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.89) and accuracy (0.92) among the four tests and had comparable specificity (0.94) and a positive predictive value (0.90) compared with the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shift test. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of MADT was 122.92, with other test values of no more than 55.45. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the MADT was 0.92 ± 0.01, with a significant difference compared with that for the anterior drawer test (z = 17.00, p < 0.001), Lachman test (z = 9.66, p = 0.002), and pivot shift test (z = 16.39, p < 0.001). The interobserver reproducibility of the MADT was good, with a kappa coefficient of 0.86. When diagnosing partial tears of ACL, the MADT was significantly more sensitive than the anterior drawer test (p < 0.001), Lachman test (p = 0.026), and pivot shift test (p = 0.013). The MADT showed similar sensitivity in detecting anteromedial and posterolateral bundle tears (p = 0.113) and no difference in diagnosing acute and chronic ACL ruptures (χ2 = 1.682, p = 0.195).ConclusionsThe MADT is also an alternative diagnostic test to detect ACL tear, which is equally superior to the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, and pivot shifting test. It could improve the diagnosis of ACL ruptures combined with other clinical information including injury history, clinical examination, and radiological findings.Levels of evidenceLevel II/observational diagnostic studies TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ChiCTR1900022945 /retrospectively registered.

Dataset Information

The MRI posterior drawer test to assess posterior cruciate ligament functionality and knee joint laxity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets