Dataset Information

Therapeutic Effects of Add-On Tenapanor for Hemodialysis Patients with Refractory Hyperphosphatemia.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Phosphate binders are used to treat hyperphosphatemia. Some patients have inappropriately controlled serum phosphorus levels, which may occur for many reasons, including a high pill burden and adverse events (AEs). Tenapanor selectively inhibits the passive paracellular transfer of phosphate in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing serum phosphorus levels. This novel mechanism of action may contribute to improved phosphate management. The efficacy and safety of tenapanor have not been evaluated in Japanese patients with high serum phosphorus levels despite treatment with phosphate binders. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of add-on tenapanor therapy for reducing serum phosphorus levels in this population.

Methods

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia undergoing hemodialysis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenapanor or placebo as an add-on to their phosphate binder regimen for 6 weeks. Change in serum phosphorus levels at week 6 (day 43) compared with the baseline value (day 1, week 0) (primary endpoint), achievement of target serum phosphorus levels (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 or ≤5.5 mg/dL), and safety, based on all AEs and drug-related AEs, were among the outcomes evaluated.

Results

In total, 24 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group and 23 to the tenapanor group. The mean serum phosphorus level decreased from 7.01 mg/dL on day 1 to 6.69 mg/dL on day 43 in the placebo group and from 6.77 mg/dL on day 1 to 4.67 mg/dL on day 43 in the tenapanor group. In the placebo and tenapanor groups (modified intent-to-treat population), the mean (standard deviation) change in the serum phosphorus level at day 43 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) was 0.08 (1.52) mg/dL and -1.99 (1.24) mg/dL, respectively, with a between-group difference of -2.07 (95% confidence interval: -2.89, -1.26; p < 0.001). The target achievement rate (serum phosphorus level ≤6.0 mg/dL at week 6 [LOCF]) was 37.5 and 87.0% in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. Diarrhea was the most common drug-related AE, and it occurred in 8.3 and 65.2% of patients in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. No specific AEs were observed with add-on tenapanor or with phosphate binders.

Discussion/conclusion

Therapy with existing phosphate binders and add-on tenapanor resulted in a significant decrease in serum phosphorus level compared with the placebo group in patients with refractory hyperphosphatemia despite treatment with phosphate binders. No new safety signals were raised, and add-on tenapanor was generally well tolerated.

SUBMITTER: Shigematsu T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8491508 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesInterdialytic weight gain in patients on hemodialysis is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and increased mortality. The degree of interdialytic weight gain is influenced by sodium intake. We evaluated the effects of tenapanor (AZD1722 and RDX5791), a minimally systemically available inhibitor of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, on interdialytic weight gain in patients with CKD stage 5D treated with hemodialysis.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThis phase 2, randomized, double-blind study (NCT01764854; conducted January to September of 2013) enrolled adults on maintenance hemodialysis with interdialytic weight gain ≥3.0% of postdialysis weight and ≥2 kg. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tenapanor or placebo. The primary end point was change in mean interdialytic weight gain (percentage of baseline postdialysis weight) from baseline (mean across a 2-week run-in period) to week 4. In a subgroup of inpatients, 24-hour stool sodium and stool weight were assessed for 1 week.ResultsSixteen patients received 1 week of inpatient treatment (tenapanor, eight; placebo, eight), and 72 patients received 4 weeks of treatment in an outpatient setting (tenapanor, 37; placebo, 35; completers: tenapanor, 31; placebo, 33). In the outpatient cohort, no significant effect on interdialytic weight gain was detected; least squares mean changes in relative interdialytic weight gain from baseline to week 4 were tenapanor, -0.26% (95% confidence interval, -0.57% to 0.06%) and placebo, -0.23% (95% confidence interval, -0.54% to 0.07%; P=0.46). During week 1 (inpatient cohort only), compared with placebo, tenapanor treatment resulted in higher stool sodium content (mean [±SD]: tenapanor, 36.6 [±21.8] mmol/d; placebo, 2.8 [±2.7] mmol/d; P<0.001) and higher stool weight (tenapanor, 172.5 [±68.1] g/d; placebo, 86.3 [±30.0] g/d; P<0.01). A similar safety profile was observed across treatment groups with the exception of diarrhea, which occurred more frequently with tenapanor treatment.ConclusionsTenapanor treatment increased stool sodium and weight over placebo in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, over 4 weeks of treatment, there was no difference in interdialytic weight gain between patients treated with tenapanor and those receiving placebo.

Project description:BackgroundHigh levels of serum phosphorus both at baseline and during follow-up are associated with increased mortality in dialysis patients, and administration of phosphate binders was independently associated with improved survival among hemodialysis population. Calcium-based phosphate binders are the most commonly used phosphate binders in developing countries for their relatively low costs.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety between calcium carbonate and calcium acetate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google scholar and Chinese databases (Wanfang, Weipu, National Knowledge Infrastructure of China) were searched for relevant studies published before March 2014. Reference lists of nephrology textbooks and review articles were checked. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that assessed the effects and adverse events of calcium acetate and calcium carbonate in adult patients with MHD was performed using Review Manager 5.0.ResultsA total of ten studies (625 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. There was insufficient data in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events for meta-analysis. Compared with calcium carbonate group, the serum phosphorus was significantly lower in calcium acetate group after4 weeks' administration (MD -0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.01) and after 8 weeks' administration (MD -0.25 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.11). There was no difference in serum calcium levels or the incidence of hypercalcemia between two groups at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. No statistical difference was found in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels or serum calcium by phosphorus (Ca x P) product. There was significantly higher risk of intolerance with calcium acetate treatment (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.26).ConclusionsFor hyperphosphatemia treatment, calcium acetate showed better efficacy and with a higher incidence of intolerance compared with calcium carbonate. There are insufficient data to establish the comparative superiority of the two calcium-based phosphate binders on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular end-points in hemodialysis patients.