Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for T2N0 (>3 cm) non-small cell lung cancer: Outcomes and failure patterns.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose/objectives
Outcomes of T2N0 lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy are not well known.Methods and materials
We conducted a single institution retrospective review of patients with T2N0 NSCLC who were treated with SBRT. The local, regional, distant control rates were calculated from available clinical data. Survival outcomes were determined using the Kaplan Meier method.Results
Fifty-six patients met our selection criteria. The two-year local control rate was 84.2%. The two and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were 31.9% and 15.3% and 39.9% and 12.1%, respectively. Centroid BED10 > 150Gy was associated with improved DFS, (p = 0.014), and OS on univariable analysis (p=0.0132).Conclusions
SBRT provides good local control for T2N0 NSCLC, but systemic failure remains problematic.
SUBMITTER: Shamp SJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8492054 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose/objectivesPatients with lung cancer sometimes present with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs), either simultaneously (synchronous) or after treatment of an initial lesion (metachronous). Although open surgery remains a treatment mainstay for patients with stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an acceptable alternative for patients who are medically unfit for or who refuse surgery. In this study, we retrospectively examine the outcome among patients with early-stage MPLCs treated at our institution with SBRT.Materials/methodsPatients at our institution receiving SBRT for MPLC between June 2011 and March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Prior to undergoing definitive SBRT, the imaging, and pathology for every patient were reviewed in a multi-disciplinary thoracic/pulmonary tumor board. Dose and fractionation varied with the most common prescriptions being 50 Gy/5 fractions, 56 Gy/4 fractions, and 55 Gy/5 fractions.ResultsA total of 38 patients with a total of 80 MPLCs were treated, among which 68 were T1 lesions and 12 were T2 lesions. Median follow-up was 25.9 months, with local control (LC) rates calculated per lesion to be 98.6%, 93.3%, and 88.2% at one, two, and three years. Median overall survival (OS) was 43.5 months; 83.6%, 67.8%, and 52.3% at one, two, and three years, respectively. Sixty-two of the 80 (77.5%) treated lesions were not associated with any subsequent acute or late toxicity. The 18 (22.5%) lesions associated with toxicity included nine acute and nine late events. All toxicity was either grade 1 (13 of 18) or grade 2 (five of 18).ConclusionsSBRT for early-stage MPLC achieves high control rates with limited toxicity. MPLC patients deemed unfit for open surgical management should be considered for definitive SBRT.
| S-EPMC10395656 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough T1-T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer can be managed with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) alone, this management has often been extrapolated to T1-T2N0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This secondary analysis of a multi-institutional cohort study investigated whether the addition of chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) improved the outcomes for these patients.Materials and methodsAll cases of histologically confirmed T1-T2N0M0 SCLC were obtained from 24 institutions' prospectively collected SBRT databases. The clinical and treatment characteristics, toxicities, outcomes, and patterns of failure were assessed. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the survival outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the predictors of outcomes.ResultsFrom 24 institutions, 76 lesions were treated in 74 patients (median follow-up, 18 months). Chemotherapy and PCI were delivered in 56% and 23% of cases, respectively. The median SBRT dose per fraction was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Patients receiving chemotherapy experienced increased median disease-free survival (61.3 vs. 9.0 months; P = .02) and overall survival (31.4 vs. 14.3 months; P = .02). Chemotherapy independently predicted for better outcomes for disease-free survival and overall survival on multivariate analysis (P = .01). Toxicities were uncommon; 5.2% experienced grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. Post-treatment failures were most commonly distant (45.8% of recurrences), followed by nodal (25.0%), and elsewhere in the lung (20.8%). The median time to each was 5 to 7 months.ConclusionPatients undergoing primary SBRT for T1-T2N0 SCLC should also undergo additional chemotherapy. No established role was found for PCI in this population.
| S-EPMC6108891 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:There is a lack of data on the biologically effective dose and the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, and this study was conducted to explore the relation between BED and efficacy. METHODS:This study is designed as a mono-center study. The participants are randomized into three group, and received the following recommended schedule: 49Gy/7f, 54Gy/6f and 55Gy/5f with BED10 in correspondence to 83.3Gy, 102.6Gy and 115.5Gy. The primary outcome measures are to calculate local control rates (LC), overall survival rates (OS) and progression-free survival rates (PFS). The secondary outcome measures are to observe radiation-induced liver injury (RILD) rates, Child-Pugh score and indocyanine green retention rate at 15?min (ICG-R15) value before and after CK-SBRT. Moreover, gastrointestinal toxicities are also observed. DISCUSSION:There is no uniform standard for CK-SBRT dose schedule of hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose to conduct a study determining the optimal CK-SBRT schedule of hepatocellular carcinoma patients (?5?cm). The trial protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of 302 Hospital of PLA (People's Liberation Army). The Ethics number is 2017111D. TRAIL REGISTRATION:Clinical trails number: NCT03295500. Date of registration: November, 2017.
| S-EPMC6986016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We report single-institution clinical efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and a subset of patients who received neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy as part of an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) protocol.From October 2008 to June 2015, 31 consecutive patients with unresectable extrahepatic (n = 25) or intrahepatic (n = 6) cholangiocarcinoma were treated with SBRT and retrospectively analyzed. Four patients underwent liver transplantation, and 1 underwent resection. SBRT was delivered in 5 fractions with a median dose of 40 Gy. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Overall survival (OS), time to progression, and local control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.The median follow-up time was 11.5 months. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 59% and 33%, respectively, with a median survival of 15.7 months. The 1- and 2-year freedom from progression was 67% and 34%, respectively. Median time to progression was 16.8 months. Nine patients had local failure. The actuarial 1- and 2-year local control rates were 78% and 47%, respectively. Among patients who also had OLT, the median OS was 31.3 months. Twenty-four patients (77%) experienced some form of acute grade 1-2 toxicity, most commonly fatigue or pain. Five patients (16%) experienced grade ≥3 toxicity.SBRT is a promising option for patients with unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma either as a component of neoadjuvant therapy prior to OLT or as part of definitive therapy for patients who are unresectable and not eligible for transplantation.
| S-EPMC5514222 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeFewer attendances for radiation therapy results in increased efficiency and less foot traffic within a radiation therapy department. We investigated outcomes after single-fraction (SF) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic disease.Methods and materialsBetween February 2010 and June 2019, patients who received SF SBRT to 1 to 5 sites of oligometastatic disease were included in this retrospective study. The primary objective was to describe patterns of first failure after SBRT. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), high-grade treatment-related toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3), and freedom from systemic therapy (FFST).ResultsIn total, 371 patients with 494 extracranial oligometastases received SF SBRT ranging from 16 Gy to 28 Gy. The most common primary malignancies were prostate (n = 107), lung (n = 63), kidney (n = 52), gastrointestinal (n = 51), and breast cancers (n = 42). The median follow-up was 3.1 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 93%, 69%, and 55%, respectively; PFS was 48%, 19%, and 14%, respectively; and FFST was 70%, 43%, and 35%, respectively. Twelve patients (3%) developed grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxicity, with no grade 5 toxicity. As the first site of failure, the cumulative incidence of local failure (irrespective of other failures) at 1, 3 and 5 years was 4%, 8%, and 8%, respectively; locoregional relapse at the primary was 10%, 18%, and 18%, respectively; and distant failure was 45%, 66%, and 70%, respectively.ConclusionsSF SBRT is safe and effective, and a significant proportion of patients remain FFST for several years after therapy. This approach could be considered in resource-constrained or bundled-payment environments. Locoregional failure of the primary site is the second most common pattern of failure, suggesting a role for optimization of primary control during metastasis-directed therapy.
| S-EPMC7560377 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Extracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare pathological, benign conditions that are characterized by aberrantly connected arteries and veins without normal intervening capillary vasculature. Although stereotactic radiosurgery is an established, efficacious, safe treatment for intracranial AVMs, there is no known published data on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of abdominopelvic AVMs. One patient with an extracranial AVM in the pelvis that was only partially responsive to embolization was treated with SBRT to a dose of 21 Gy, delivered in three fractions over six calendar days. At presentation, the patient was non-ambulatory due to neuropathic pain from a sciatic impingement of the AVM. The patient underwent two prior catheter-based embolization procedures that had achieved partial obliteration, but with the persistence of neuropathic pain and symptoms. After SBRT to the pelvic AVM, the patient had marked improvement in pain over 10 months and was able to ambulate again. Follow-up angiography and CT demonstrated the obliteration of previously visualized AVM. We describe the first known report of pelvic AVM successfully treated with a combination of embolization and SBRT. Three-fraction SBRT to a total dose of 21 Gy appears to be safe and effective for extracranial AVMs arising in the pelvis. This strategy may be considered for patients with pelvic AVMs that are refractory to standard interventional therapies. However, these findings should be validated in larger cohorts.
| S-EPMC8589004 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPreclinical evidence demonstrates the immunogenic potential of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). There is growing interest in investigating this interplay with the immune system in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Cytoreduction with SBRT and combination therapy with SBRT and checkpoint inhibitor immuno-oncology agents (IO) are two potential therapeutic strategies in mRCC. In this review, we summarize the current clinical evidence for the use of cytoreductive SBRT to primary kidney and combination SBRT with IO.MethodsA literature review for articles and abstracts published between January 2000 and March 2020 was conducted through the PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) databases. Evaluation of studies followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) criteria.ResultsA total of three articles for cytoreductive SBRT and one article and three abstracts for combination SBRT and IO in mRCC met inclusion criteria for this review. Evidence for SBRT to primary kidney is limited by small series and pilot studies. Outcomes vary widely due to small patient numbers and study heterogeneity. Local control ranges from 85-100% and one- and two-year overall survival ranges from 38-71% and 19-53%, respectively. Combination SBRT and IO are tolerable for patients with early data, suggesting grade 3-4 adverse event rates of 0-24%. Long-term survival data is not yet available.ConclusionsCytoreductive SBRT and combination SBRT with IO therapy represent promising treatment strategies in mRCC. The evidence for clinical benefit is currently limited and requires further study with well-designed, randomized controlled trials.
| S-EPMC8418257 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to report the first detailed analysis of patterns of failure within the spinal axis of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for sarcoma spine metastases. METHODS Between 2005 and 2012, 88 consecutive patients with metastatic sarcoma were treated with SBRT for 120 spinal lesions. Seventy-one percent of patients were enrolled on prospective institutional protocols. For patients who underwent routine posttreatment total-spine MRI (64 patients, 88 lesions), each site of progression within the entire spinal axis was mapped in relation to the treated lesion. Actuarial rates of local-, adjacent-, and distant-segment failure-free survival (FFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up for the cohort was 14.4 months, with 81.7% of patients followed up until death. The 12-month actuarial rate of local FFS was 85.9%; however, 83.3% of local failures occurred in conjunction with distant-segment failures. The 12-month actuarial rates of isolated local-, adjacent-, and distant-segment FFS were 98.0%, 97.8%, and 74.7%, respectively. Of patients with any spinal progression (n = 55), only 25.5% (n = 14) had progression at a single vertebral level, with 60.0% (n = 33) having progression at ≥ 3 sites within the spine simultaneously. Linear regression analysis revealed a relationship of decreasing risk of failure with increasing distance from the treated index lesion (R(2) = 0.87), and 54.1% of failures occurred ≥ 5 vertebral levels away. Treatment of the index lesion with a lower biological effective dose (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.2) and presence of local failure (OR 18.0, 95% CI 2.1-152.9) independently predicted for distant spine failure. CONCLUSIONS Isolated local- and adjacent-segment failures are exceptionally rare for patients with metastatic sarcoma to the spine treated with SBRT, thereby affirming the treatment of the involved level only. The majority of progression within the spinal axis occurs ≥ 5 vertebral levels away. Thus, total-spine imaging is necessary for surveillance posttreatment.
| S-EPMC5551386 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver metastases in patients unsuitable for surgery. We investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes for liver metastases treated with SBRT from a multi-center, international patient registry.Patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT were identified in the RSSearch® Patient Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with treatment outcomes were assessed. Dose fractionations were normalized to BED10. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and log-rank test.The study included 427 patients with 568 liver metastases from 25 academic and community-based centers. Median age was 67 years (31-91 years). Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) was the most common primary cancer. 73% of patients received prior chemotherapy. Median tumor volume was 40 cm3 (1.6-877 cm3), median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (12-60 Gy) delivered in a median of 3 fractions [1-5]. At a median follow-up of 14 months (1-91 months) the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Median OS was greater for patients with CRC (27 mo), breast (21 mo) and gynecological (25 mo) metastases compared to lung (10 mo), other gastro-intestinal (GI) (18 mo) and pancreatic (6 mo) primaries (p?<?0.0001). Smaller tumor volumes (<?40 cm3) correlated with improved OS (25 months vs 15 months p?=?0.0014). BED10???100 Gy was also associated with improved OS (27 months vs 15 months p?<?0.0001). Local control (LC) was evaluable in 430 liver metastases from 324 patients. Two-year LC rates was better for BED10???100 Gy (77.2% vs 59.6%) and the median LC was better for tumors <?40 cm3 (52 vs 39 months). There was no difference in LC based on histology of the primary tumor.In a large, multi-institutional series of patients with liver metastasis treated with SBRT, reasonable LC and OS was observed. OS and LC depended on dose and tumor volume, while OS varied by primary tumor. Future prospective trials on the role of SBRT for liver metastasis from different primaries in the setting of multidisciplinary management including systemic therapy, is warranted.Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885299 .
| S-EPMC5811977 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the developed world and is predicted to become the second by 2030. A cure may be achieved only with surgical resection of an early diagnosed disease. Surgery for more advanced disease is challenging and can be contraindicated for many reasons. Neoadjuvant therapy may improve the probability of achieving R0 resection. It consists of systemic treatment followed by radiation therapy applied concurrently or sequentially with cytostatics. A novel approach to irradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), has the potential to improve treatment results. SBRT can deliver higher doses of radiation to the tumor in only a few treatment fractions. It has attracted significant interest for pancreatic cancer patients, as it is completed quickly, requires less time away from full-dose chemotherapy, and is well-tolerated than conventional radiotherapy. In this review, we aim to provide the reader with a basic overview of current evidence for SBRT indications in the treatment of pancreatic tumors. In the second part of the review, we focus on practical information with respect to SBRT treatment plan preparation the performance of such therapy. Finally, we discuss future directions related to the use of magnetic resonance linear accelerators.
| S-EPMC9599229 | biostudies-literature