Dataset Information

Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sintilimab-dominated triple therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has shown promising results in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade, combined with sorafenib and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization in this patient population, compared with sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy. This was a 22 months single center retrospective cohort study in China. 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included, with diagnosis confirmed by either histologic, cytologic or diagnostic imaging analysis. The patients were divided into three groups based on therapeutic regimen: sintilimab monotherapy (sintilimab group, n = 22), sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy (duplex group, n = 23), sintilimab-sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined therapy (triple group, n = 35). The principal evaluation criteria were overall survival and progression free survival in the population, assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary evaluation criteria were safety, objective response rate and disease control rate. From March 1st, 2019 to December 31, 2020, 80 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included and divided into three treatment groups (22 received sintilimab monotherapy, 23 received sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy, and 35 received sintilimab-sorafenib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). The median overall survival of all patients was 11.0 months (95% CI 7.7-14.3). Median overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI NE-NE), 9.0 months(95% CI 6.3-11.7)and 3.0 months (95% CI 1.9-4.1, p < 0.0001) in the triple therapy, duplex and sintilimab groups respectively, while the corresponding median progression-free survival were 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9-7.1, p < 0.001), 4.0 months (95% CI 2.8-5.2) and 2.0 months (95% CI 1.7-2.3). Disease control and clinical benefits rates were higher in the triple therapy group (80%, 95% CI 63.1-91.6, p < 0.001; 54.3%, 95% CI 36.6-71.2, p < 0.01) compared to the sintilimab group. Median duration of disease control was 4.0 months (95% CI NE-NE, p < 0.01) in the triple therapy group, longer than that of the duplex group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.9-3.1) and sintilimab group (2.0 months, 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26.3% of 80 patients with hypertension was the most common event observed (38, 47.5%), however, other severe toxic effects were infrequent. Sintilimab combined with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization might have more beneficial effects on overall and progression-free survival and on the duration of disease control outcomes than both sintilimab monotherapy and sintilimab-sorafenib duotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This triple therapy model might represent an innovative and effective option for inoperable liver cancer.

SUBMITTER: Dai L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8492645 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPatients with intermediate or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for radical treatment typically have a poor overall prognosis. Treatment strategies that can convert unresectable HCC into resectable HCC may improve patient survival. We conducted a single arm phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sintilimab plus Lenvatinib as conversion therapy for HCC.MethodsA single-arm, single-center study conducted in China (NCT04042805). Adults (≥18 years) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage B or C HCC ineligible for radical surgery with no distant/lymph node metastasis received Sintilimab 200 mg IV on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus Lenvatinib 12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) or 8 mg (body weight <60 kg) orally once daily. Resectability was based on imaging and liver function. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS) in patients who underwent resection, surgical conversion rate, and safety.ResultsOverall, 36 patients were treated between August 1, 2018, and November 25, 2021; the median age was 58 years (range, 30-79), and 86% were male. The ORR (RECIST v1.1) was 36.1% (95% CI, 20.4-51.8) and the DCR was 94.4% (95% CI, 86.9-99.9). Eleven patients underwent radical surgery and one received radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy; after a median follow up of 15.9 months, all 12 were alive and four had recurrence, median EFS was not reached. Median PFS among 24 patients who did not undergo surgery was 14.3 months (95% CI, 6.3-26.5). Treatment was generally well tolerated; two patients had serious adverse events; there were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionsSintilimab plus Lenvatinib is safe and feasible for the conversion treatment of intermediate to locally advanced HCC initially unsuitable for surgical resection.

Project description:Background and aimsHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death all over the world, and brings a heavy social economic burden especially in China. Several immuno-combination therapies have shown promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of unresectable HCC and are widely used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, which combination is the most affordable one is unknown. Our study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the immuno-combinations as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC from the perspective of Chinese payers.MethodsA Markov model was built according to five multicenter, phase III, open-label, randomized trials (Himalaya, IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, CARES-310, LEAP-002) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (STRIDE), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B), sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) (S + B), camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (C + R), and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (P + L). Three disease states were included: progression free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) as well as death. Medical costs were searched from West China Hospital, published literatures or the Red Book. Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated to compare costs among different combinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robust of the model.ResultsThe total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of C + R, S + B, P + L, A + B and STRIDE were $12,109.27 and 0.91, $26,961.60 and 1.12, $55,382.53 and 0.83, $70,985.06 and 0.90, $84,589.01 and 0.73, respectively, resulting in the most cost-effective strategy of C + R with CER of $13,306.89 per QALY followed by S + B with CER of $24,072.86 per QALY. Compared with C + R, the ICER of S + B strategy was $70,725.38 per QALY, which would become the most cost-effective when the willing-to-pay threshold exceeded $73,500/QALY. In the subgroup analysis, with the application of Asia results in Leap-002 trial, the model results were the same as global data. In the sensitivity analysis, with the variation of parameters, the results were robust.ConclusionAs one of the promising immuno-combination therapies in the first-line systemic treatment of HCC, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib demonstrated the potential to be the most cost-effective strategy, which warranted further studies to best inform the real-world clinical practices.

Dataset Information

Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sintilimab-dominated triple therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets