Dataset Information

Serum bilirubin levels are associated with poor functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The prognostic value of serum bilirubin in stroke is controversial, since bilirubin has both neuroprotective and neurotoxic properties. We aimed to investigate the association between serum bilirubin, including total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and indirect bilirubin (IBIL) and poor functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Methods

All patients with AIS or TIA were recruited from the Third China National Stroke Registry. The poor functional outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 2-6 and 3-6 at 3 months and 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the associations of TBIL, DBIL, and IBIL with poor functional outcomes.

Results

Among 11,121 enrolled patients, the median (interquartile range) of TBIL, DBIL, and IBIL was 13.30 (9.90-17.70), 3.80 (2.70-5.30), and 9.30 (6.70-12.80) µmol/L. After adjustment for conventional confounding factors, patients in the highest TBIL quartile had the highest proportion of mRS score 2-6 at 3 months (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.59) and 1 year (OR, 1.31; 95 % CI, 1.13-1.52), and mRS score 3-6 at 3 months (OR, 1.33; 95 % CI, 1.11-1.59) and 1 year (OR, 1.28; 95 % CI, 1.07-1.53), when compared to patients in the lowest TBIL quartile. Similar results were observed for DBIL and IBIL. We also found J-shaped associations between serum bilirubin levels and each outcome.

Conclusions

Elevated levels of serum bilirubin were significantly associated with poor functional outcomes in patients with AIS or TIA at 3 months and 1 year.

SUBMITTER: Ouyang Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8493700 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk for future cardiovascular events despite current preventive therapies. The identification of insulin resistance as a risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction raised the possibility that pioglitazone, which improves insulin sensitivity, might benefit patients with cerebrovascular disease.MethodsIn this multicenter, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 3876 patients who had had a recent ischemic stroke or TIA to receive either pioglitazone (target dose, 45 mg daily) or placebo. Eligible patients did not have diabetes but were found to have insulin resistance on the basis of a score of more than 3.0 on the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index. The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction.ResultsBy 4.8 years, a primary outcome had occurred in 175 of 1939 patients (9.0%) in the pioglitazone group and in 228 of 1937 (11.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the pioglitazone group, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.93; P=0.007). Diabetes developed in 73 patients (3.8%) and 149 patients (7.7%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69; P<0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.17; P=0.52). Pioglitazone was associated with a greater frequency of weight gain exceeding 4.5 kg than was placebo (52.2% vs. 33.7%, P<0.001), edema (35.6% vs. 24.9%, P<0.001), and bone fracture requiring surgery or hospitalization (5.1% vs. 3.2%, P=0.003).ConclusionsIn this trial involving patients without diabetes who had insulin resistance along with a recent history of ischemic stroke or TIA, the risk of stroke or myocardial infarction was lower among patients who received pioglitazone than among those who received placebo. Pioglitazone was also associated with a lower risk of diabetes but with higher risks of weight gain, edema, and fracture. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091949.).

Project description:Objective: Abnormal elevation of D-dimer levels is an important indicator of disseminated intravascular clotting. Therefore, we hypothesized that high D-dimer levels were associated with the risk of stroke and adverse clinical outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: The present meta-analysis aimed to systematically analyze the associations between D-dimer and the risk of stroke as well as the clinical outcomes of patients with post-stroke or TIA. Meanwhile, dose-response analyses were conducted when there were sufficient data available. Three electronic databases including Pubmed, the Embase database, and the Cochrane Library were searched by two investigators independently. All the pooled results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs). Results: Finally, 22 prospective cohort studies were included into this meta-analysis. The results suggested that high D-dimer levels were associated with increased risks of total stroke (RR 1.4, 95%CI 1.20-1.63), hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.25, 95%CI 0.69-2.25), and ischemic Stroke (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.22-1.98), and the dose-dependent relationship was not found upon dose-response analyses. Besides, the high D-dimer levels on admission were correlated with increased risks of all-cause mortality [RR 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.49], 5-day recurrence (RR 2.28, 95%CI 1.32-3.95), and poor functional outcomes (RR 2.01, 95%CI 1.71-2.36) in patients with AIS or TIA. Conclusions: On the whole, high D-dimer levels may be associated with the risks of total stroke and ischemic stroke, but not with hemorrhagic stroke. However, dose-response analyses do not reveal distinct evidence for a dose-dependent association of D-dimer levels with the risk of stroke. Besides, high D-dimer levels on admission may predict adverse clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, 5-day recurrence, and 90-day poor functional outcomes, of patients with AIS or TIA. More studies are warranted to quantify the effect of D-dimer levels on the risk of stroke or TIA, so as to verify and substantiate this conclusion in the future.

Project description:Background and purposeHospitalizations for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the quality of care and outcomes for patients with AIS/TIA before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic across the United States Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study compared AIS/TIA care quality before (March-September 2019) vs. during (March-September 2020) the pandemic. Electronic health record data were used to identify patient characteristics, quality of care and outcomes. The without-fail rate was a composite measure summarizing whether an individual patient received all of the seven processes for which they were eligible. Mixed effects logistic regression modeling was used to assess differences between the two periods.ResultsA decrease in presentations occurred during the pandemic (N = 4360 vs. N = 5636 patients; p = 0.003) and was greater for patients with TIA (-30.4%) than for AIS (-18.7%). The without-fail rate improved during the pandemic (56.2 vs. before 50.1%). The use of high/moderate potency statins increased among AIS patients (OR 1.26 [1.06-1.48]) and remained unchanged among those with TIA (OR 1.04 [0.83,1.29]). Blood pressure measurement within 90-days of discharge was less frequent during the pandemic (57.8 vs. 89.2%, p < 0.001). Hypertension control decreased among patients with AIS (OR 0.73 [0.60-0.90]) and TIA (OR 0.72 [0.54-0.96]). The average systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 1.9/1.4 mmHg higher during the pandemic than before (p < 0.001). Compared to before, during the pandemic fewer AIS patients had a primary care visit (52.5% vs. 79.8%; p = 0.0001) or a neurology visit (27.9 vs. 41.1%; p = 0.085). Both 30- and 90-day unadjusted all-cause mortality rates were higher in 2020 (3.6% and 6.7%) vs. 2019 (2.9, 5.4%; p = 0.041 and p = 0.006); but these differences were not statistically significant after risk adjustment.ConclusionsOverall quality of care for patients with AIS/TIA did not decline during the COVID-19 pandemic.