Dataset Information

Predicting mortality and no-reflow in STEMI patients using epicardial adipose tissue.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Acute myocardial infarction is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It occurs when irreversible myocardial cell damage or death occurs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most serious presentation of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. STEMI results from the occlusion of a major coronary artery. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy. It should be performed by an experienced team within the shortest time possible from the first medical contact.

Hypothesis

Increased mortality risk and no-reflow in STEMI patients with epicardial adipose tissue thickness (EAT) more than 5 mm compared to STEMI patients with EAT less than 5 mm.

Methods

This study was conducted on 113 patients who presented to the cardiology department of Ain Shams university hospital with the first STEMI and underwent primary PCI. Medical treatment for STEMI was given to all subjects as per the guidelines. All patients underwent an echocardiographic evaluation of epicardial adipose tissue and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were divided into two groups using epicardial adipose tissue thickness of 5 mm as a cutoff point; this number was derived from the ROC curve. Group I: Included patients with EAT thickness less than 5 mm, including 44 patients (38.9%). Group II: Included patients with EAT thickness greater than 5 mm, including 69 patients (61.1%).

Results

The current study showed that epicardial fat thickness significantly correlated with the no-reflow phenomenon in the cath lab and overall prognosis in patients with STEMI.

Conclusion

Increased EAT thickness may be an independent predictor of the no-reflow phenomenon and mortality. Therefore, our study emphasizes that EAT thickness measured by echocardiography may provide additional and substantial information on the risk of no-reflow and mortality in STEMI patients.

SUBMITTER: Mohamed A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8495074 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThis study aimed to construct a radiomics signature of epicardial adipose tissue for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).MethodsWe reviewed the preoperative computed tomography pulmonary angiography images of CTEPH patients who underwent PEA at our institution between December 2016 and May 2022. Patients were divided into training/validation and testing cohorts by stratified random sampling in a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics features were selected by using intra- and inter-class correlation coefficient, redundancy analysis, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator algorithm to construct the radiomics signature. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicability of the radiomics signature. Two hundred-times stratified five-fold cross-validation was applied to assess the reliability and robustness of the radiomics signature.ResultsA total of 93 patients with CTEPH were included in this study, including 23 patients with POAF and 70 patients without POAF. Five of the 1,218 radiomics features were finally selected to construct the radiomics signature. The radiomics signature showed good discrimination with an AUC of 0.804 (95%CI: 0.664-0.943) in the training/validation cohort and 0.728 (95% CI: 0.503-0.953) in the testing cohorts. The average AUC of 200 times stratified five-fold cross-validation was 0.804 (95%CI: 0.801-0.806) and 0.807 (95%CI: 0.798-0.816) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the predicted and actual observations. Based on the DCA, the radiomics signature was found to be clinically significant and useful.ConclusionThe radiomics signature achieved good discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicability. As a potential imaging biomarker, the radiomics signature of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) may provide a reference for the risk assessment and individualized treatment of CTEPH patients at high risk of developing POAF after PEA.

Project description:AimsEpicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is increasingly recognized as an important factor in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold-standard imaging modality to evaluate EAT size, but in contrast to echocardiography, CMR is costly and not widely available. We investigated EAT thickness on echocardiography in relation to EAT volume on CMR, and we assessed the agreement between observers for measuring echocardiographic EAT.Methods and resultsPatients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction >40% were enrolled. All patients underwent CMR imaging and transthoracic-echocardiography. EAT volume was quantified on CMR short-axis cine-stacks. Echocardiographic EAT thickness was measured on parasternal long-axis and short-axis views. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the association between EAT volume on CMR and EAT thickness on echocardiography. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the interobserver agreement as well as the intraobserver agreement. EAT on CMR and echocardiography was evaluated in 117 patients (mean age 71 ± 10 years, 49% women and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 54 ± 7%). Mean EAT volume on CMR was 202 ± 64 mL and ranged from 80 to 373 mL. Mean EAT thickness on echocardiography was 3.8 ± 1.5 mm and ranged from 1.7 to 10.2 mm. EAT volume on CMR and EAT thickness on echocardiography were significantly correlated (junior-observer: r = 0.62, P < 0.001, senior-observer: r = 0.33, P < 0.001), and up to one-third of the variance in EAT volume was explained by EAT thickness (R2 = 0.38, P < 0.001). The interobserver agreement between junior and senior observers for measuring echocardiographic EAT was modest [ICC, 0.65 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.77], whereas the intraobserver agreement was good (ICC 0.98, 95% CI 0.84-0.99).ConclusionsThere was a modest correlation between EAT volume on CMR and EAT thickness on echocardiography. Limited agreement between junior and senior observers for measuring echocardiographic EAT was observed. EAT thickness on echocardiography is limited in estimating EAT volume.