Dataset Information

Case Report: Long Progression-Free Survival of Immunotherapy for Lung Adenocarcinoma With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been clinically proven to be efficient in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it has also been found that immunotherapy is not effective for all patients. For instance, some patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tumors have a low overall response rate to ICIs. As a result, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) blockade (atezolizumab) treatment for a patient with EGFR mutation, and we explored the interaction between immunotherapy and EGFR mutations in NSCLC.

Case presentation

A patient, 62-year-old non-smoking female, with lung adenocarcinoma was initially misdiagnosed as EGFR wild type and received a third-line treatment with atezolizumab, experiencing partial response (PR) and progression-free survival (PFS) for 23 months. She had later been confirmed with EGFR L858R mutation prior to taking atezolizumab. On top of that, the patient developed T790M mutation after being administered with atezolizumab instead of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). She started with osimertinib, although the lesion continued to progress. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) had been tested for further analysis.

Conclusion

The case report and literature review indicate that ICIs might be more effective for L858R mutation than for other EGFR mutant subtypes, which correlates with certain potential predictors such as TMB and concurrent PD-L1 plus CD8⁺ TIL expression. However, there is no report on progression from non-primary EGFR T790M mutation to T790M mutation of patients who neither previously suffered from EGFR-TKIs nor responded to osimertinib. This case report will offer some information to guide the investigation on how to identify those who can benefit from immunotherapy and those who do not respond to EGFR-TKIs among the patients with EGFR mutations.

SUBMITTER: Peng J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8495127 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for lung cancer. This study aims to construct a tumor mutation-related model that combines long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression levels and tumor mutation levels in tumor genomes to detect the possibilities of the lncRNA signature as an indicator for predicting the prognosis and response to immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).MethodsWe downloaded the tumor mutation profiles and RNA-seq expression database of LUAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed lncRNAs were extracted based on the cumulative number of mutations. Cox regression analyses were used to identify the prognostic lncRNA signature, and the prognostic value of the five selected lncRNAs was validated by using survival analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We used qPCR to validate the expression of five selected lncRNAs between human lung epithelial and human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines. The ImmuCellAI, immunophenoscore (IPS) scores and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) analyses were used to predict the response to immunotherapy for this mutation related lncRNA signature.ResultsA total of 162 lncRNAs were detected among the differentially expressed lncRNAs between the Tumor mutational burden (TMB)-high group and the TMB-low group. Then, five lncRNAs (PLAC4, LINC01116, LINC02163, MIR223HG, FAM83A-AS1) were identified as tumor mutation-related candidates for constructing the prognostic prediction model. Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that the overall survival of the low-risk group was significantly better than that of the high-risk group, and the results of the GSE50081 set were consistent. The expression levels of PD1, PD-L1 and CTLA4 in the low-risk group were higher than those in the high-risk group. The IPS scores and TIDE scores of patients in the low-risk group were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group.ConclusionOur findings demonstrated that the five lncRNAs (PLAC4, LINC01116, LINC02163, MIR223HG, FAM83A-AS1) were identified as candidates for constructing the tumor mutation-related model which may serve as an indicator of tumor mutation levels and have important implications for predicting the response to immunotherapy in LUAD.

Project description:Background: There is limited data on the relative survival rate of first-line therapy of gefitinib, erlotinib (first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [EGFR-TKI]), and afatinib (second-generation EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma in real-world data, especially in the Asian population. This study aimed to compare the relative survival rate of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma by real-world data in Taiwan. Methods: This retrospective cohort population-based study included untreated adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were identified in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2017. The date of EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis was referred as index date. This outcome evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) between gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. Switching EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and new development of brain metastases were proxies of TTF. Estimated relative treatment effects on OS and TTF among EGFR-TKIs were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matched pair analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: The study cohort included 3,695 patients initiated with gefitinib, 3,310 with erlotinib, and 3,041 with afatinib. The mean age among the three treatment groups was 70.4 (±11.6), 66.8 (±11.6), and 64.3 (±11.4) years, and the female percentage was 70.4, 58.6, and 57.7%, respectively. Afatinib showed longer median OS than gefitinib (23.9 vs. 21.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.87; p < 0.001) and erlotinib (23.9 vs. 21.8 months; aHR, 0.87; p = 0.001). Consistent results were observed with TTF outcomes. For patients with brain metastases at diagnosis, afatinib showed similar OS with erlotinib (p = 0.917) but superior to gefitinib (p = 0.028). PS matching had similar results with IPTW adjustment in the study population. Conclusion: Afatinib as first-line therapy had better survival outcomes for EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma than gefitinib and erlotinib in the Taiwan population. Both erlotinib and afatinib demonstrated superior treatment effect in patients with initial brain metastases than gefitinib.