Dataset Information

Provider- and patient-level predictors of oral anticancer agent initiation and adherence in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Improving oral anticancer agent (OAA) initiation and adherence is the important quality-of-care issues, particularly since one fourth of anticancer agents being developed will be administered orally. Our objective was to identify provider- and patient-level characteristics associated with OAA initiation and adherence among individuals with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Methods

We used state cancer registry data linked to multi-payer claims data to identify patients with mRCC diagnosed in 2004-2015. Provider data were obtained from North Carolina Health Professions Data System and the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (CLs) using modified Poisson regression to evaluate factors associated with OAA initiation and adherence.

Results

Among the 207 (out of 687) patients who initiated an OAA following mRCC diagnosis and survived 90 days, median proportion of days covered was 0.91. Patients with a modal provider specializing in hematology/medical oncology were much more likely to initiate OAAs than those seen by other specialties. Additionally, patients with a female provider were more likely to initiate OAAs than those with a male provider. Compared to patients treated by providers practicing in both urban and rural areas, patients with providers practicing solely in urban areas were more likely to initiate OAAs, after controlling for patient-level factors (RR = 1.37; 95% CL: 1.09-1.73). Medicare patients were less likely to be adherent than those with private insurance (RR = 0.61; 95% CL: 0.42-0.87).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that provider- and patient-level factors influence OAA initiation in patients with mRCC but only insurance type was associated with adherence.

SUBMITTER: Spees LP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8495289 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeIn an era of rapid expansion of FDA approvals for oral anticancer agents (OAAs), it is important to understand the factors associated with survival among real-world populations, which include groups not well-represented in pivotal clinical trials of OAAs, such as the elderly, racial minorities, and medically complex patients. Our objective was to evaluate patient- and provider-level characteristics' associations with mortality among a multi-payer cohort of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who initiated OAAs.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the North Carolina state cancer registry linked to multi-payer claims data for the years 2004 to 2015. Provider data were obtained from North Carolina Health Professions Data System and the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System. Included patients were individuals with mRCC who initiated an OAA and survived ≥90 days after beginning treatment. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (CL) using Cox hazard models for associations between patient demographics, patient clinical characteristics, provider-level factors, and 2-year all-cause mortality.ResultsThe cohort included 207 patients with mRCC who received OAAs. In multivariable models, clinical variables such as frailty (HR: 1.36, 95% CL: 1.11-1.67) and de novo metastatic diagnosis (HR: 2.63, 95%CL: 1.67-4.16) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Additionally, patients solely on Medicare had higher adjusted all-cause mortality compared with patients with any private insurance (HR: 2.35, 95% CL: 1.32-4.18). No provider-level covariates investigated were associated with all-cause mortality.ConclusionsWithin a real-world population of mRCC patients taking OAAs, survival differed based on patient characteristics. In an era of rapid expansion of FDA approvals for OAAs, these real-world data underscore the continued importance of access to high-quality care, particularly for medically complex patients with limited resources.

Project description:BackgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension is a life-limiting complication in patients with systemic sclerosis. Current recommendations suggest a minimum screening of an annual transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test. We hypothesize that modifiable provider-level hurdles contribute to inadequate screening and can be alleviated.Methods and resultsWe performed a longitudinal study over 23 months of all systemic sclerosis patients seen in pulmonary and/or rheumatology clinics. Pulmonary arterial hypertension screening was measured monthly as percentage of patients with up-to-date transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function test out of the total systemic sclerosis patients with an outpatient encounter that month. Tests were considered "up-to-date" if they were performed 12 months prior or within the next 6 months post-encounter. Baseline adherence to PAH screening was assessed using a 9-month preproject period. Physicians in rheumatology and pulmonary clinics were surveyed for knowledge and perceived as barriers to screening. Interventions focused on provider-level hurdles to improve the screening rate to >90%. Adherence to systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension was compared between baseline and post-intervention phases as a continuous variable using nonparametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test and as categorical variable using chi-square test for overall adherence rate. A total of 18 providers were surveyed, of which 67% knew minimal screening recommendations and 44% identified "difficulty ordering tests" as a barrier. Our interventions were as follows: (1) didactic education and literature dissemination and (2) best practice alert in the electronic medical record to facilitate just-in-time ordering of screening. Adherence was measured for 23 months, comprising 166 systemic sclerosis patients. Monthly adherence to pulmonary arterial hypertension screening increased by 10.4% (69.2%-79.6%, p = 0.01 with chi-square and p = 0.09 with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test), with an increase in transthoracic echocardiogram by 7.5% and pulmonary function test by 4.9%.ConclusionProvider-level hurdles contribute to sub-optimal systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension screening. Lack of knowledge and difficulty in ordering tests were major barriers. Structured education and decision-support aids improve screening. These interventions, however, were insufficient to improve screening to a goal target of >90%.