Comutations in DDR Pathways Predict Atezolizumab Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Xiong A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8499805 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6186653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are commonly treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy such as cisplatin (CDDP) in combination with ionizing radiation (IR). Although clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of CDDP and IR appear to be synergistic in terms of therapeutic efficacy, the mechanism of synergism remains largely uncharacterized. We investigated the role of the DNA damage response (DDR) in CDDP radiosensitization using two NSCLC cell lines. Using clonogenic survival assays, we determined that the cooperative cytotoxicity of CDDP and IR treatment is sequence dependent, requiring administration of CDDP prior to IR (CDDP-IR). We identified and interrogated the unique time and agent-dependent activation of the DDR in NSCLC cells treated with cisplatin-IR combination therapy. Compared to treatment with CDDP or IR alone, CDDP-IR combination treatment led to persistence of γH2Ax foci, a marker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), for up to 24h after treatment. Interestingly, pharmacologic inhibition of DDR sensor kinases revealed the persistence of γ-H2Ax foci in CDDP-IR treated cells is independent of kinase activation. Taken together, our data suggest that delayed repair of DSBs in NSCLC cells treated with CDDP-IR contributes to CDDP radiosensitization and that alterations of the DDR pathways by inhibition of specific DDR kinases can augment CDDP-IR cytotoxicity by a complementary mechanism.
| S-EPMC4852375 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:The immune system can restrain or promote cancer development and growth. Antibodies targeting immune checkpoints have revolutionized cancer treatment. Among the best responses have been in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which is largely caused by chronic exposure to carcinogens; associated with high neoantigen creation and sensitization to immune recognition. Atezolizumab was the first approved antibody that targets the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1). Areas covered: This drug profile article covers the basics of the cancer-immunity cycle and reviews some aspects of innate and adaptive immunology. We discuss the discovery of PD-L1 and PD-L2 while highlight the potential differences in targeting PD-L1 versus PD-1. In addition, we briefly summarized the available pre-clinical and clinical data of atezolizumab use in NSCLC. A special section covers the challenges of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay. Expert commentary: PD-1:PD-L1 blockade has taken the lead in the immunotherapeutics field and represents the backbone of developing combination immunotherapies. Atezolizumab represents a step forward in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, nonetheless PD1:PD-L1 blockade in early-stage lung cancer is still a matter of debate.
| S-EPMC6089509 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Radiomics can quantify tumor phenotype characteristics non-invasively by applying advanced imaging feature algorithms. In this study we assessed if pre-treatment radiomics data are able to predict pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).127 NSCLC patients were included in this study. Fifteen radiomic features selected based on stability and variance were evaluated for its power to predict pathological response. Predictive power was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC). Conventional imaging features (tumor volume and diameter) were used for comparison.Seven features were predictive for pathologic gross residual disease (AUC>0.6, p-value<0.05), and one for pathologic complete response (AUC=0.63, p-value=0.01). No conventional imaging features were predictive (range AUC=0.51-0.59, p-value>0.05). Tumors that did not respond well to neoadjuvant chemoradiation were more likely to present a rounder shape (spherical disproportionality, AUC=0.63, p-value=0.009) and heterogeneous texture (LoG 5mm 3D - GLCM entropy, AUC=0.61, p-value=0.03).We identified predictive radiomic features for pathological response, although no conventional features were significantly predictive. This study demonstrates that radiomics can provide valuable clinical information, and performed better than conventional imaging features.
| S-EPMC4930885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAcquired resistance limits long-term epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in whom anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) efficacy is also limited. We hypothesized that combining atezolizumab with erlotinib could enhance antitumor immunity and extend efficacy in these patients.Patients and methodsThis open-label phase Ib trial was conducted in adults aged ≥18 years who had advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Stage 1 (safety evaluation) enrolled EGFR TKI-naive patients regardless of EGFR status. Stage 2 (expansion) enrolled patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with ≤1 prior non-EGFR TKI therapy. Patients received 150 mg erlotinib orally once daily. After a 7-day erlotinib run-in, atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the combination in all patients; secondary endpoints included antitumor activity per RECIST 1.1 in stage 2 patients.ResultsAt the data cut-off on 7 May 2020, 28 patients (8 in stage 1, 20 in stage 2) were assessable for safety. No dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 46% of patients; the most common were increased alanine aminotransferase, diarrhea, pyrexia, and rash (each in 7% of patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 50% of patients. Pneumonitis (grade 1) was reported in a single patient (4%). The objective response rate was 75% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50.9% to 91.3%]), median response duration was 18.9 months (95% CI 9.5-40.5 months), median progression-free survival was 15.4 months (95% CI 8.4-39.0 months), and median overall survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI 34.6-NE).ConclusionsAtezolizumab combined with erlotinib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging, durable clinical activity in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
| S-EPMC10163154 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1-4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator-assessed disease-free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease-free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.08), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.10) populations. Atezolizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment-related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease-free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.
| S-EPMC9746048 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It has remained unclear how programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors affect peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) subsets in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the predictive and prognostic value of PBL subsets in patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with atezolizumab. A total of 30 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with atezolizumab were selected as the observation group, and 30 healthy individuals were chosen as the control group during same period. Flow cytometry was used to detect lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment. The relationship between the changes of lymphocyte subsets and atezolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC was analyzed and calculated. Before treatment, compared with the control group, the number of CD3+, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+ indexes in the observation group were significantly decreased, whereas the level of CD8+ was significantly increased. The number of CD3+, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+ indexes gradually increased with the process of atezolizumab treatment, whereas the number of CD8+ T gradually decreased. After the 4 cycles, the number of CD3+, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+ indexes were significantly increased, and the number of CD8+ was significantly decreased. In the observation group, 22 patients achieved partial response (PR)/stable disease (SD) and 8 patients achieved progressive disease (PD) after 4 cycles of atezolizumab treatment. Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the level of lymphocyte subsets between those who achieved PR/SD or PD. However, a significant difference in the level of lymphocyte subsets appeared after 4 cycles of atezolizumab treatment. Among the 22 patients who achieved PR/SD, the number of CD3+, CD4+ T, and CD4+/CD8+ indexes were significantly increased, whereas the number of CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly decreased. Meanwhile, the 8 patients who achieved PD displayed different results. In addition, ROC curve combined detection of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T [area under the curve (AUC) =0.9018, P<0.0001] showed good predictive ability for the efficacy of atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC. Atezolizumab may alter the level of lymphocyte subsets in patients with advanced NSCLC, and the changes in lymphocyte subsets may predict the efficacy of atezolizumab for these patients.
| S-EPMC10636460 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To assess circulating biomarkers as predictors of antitumor response to atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Tecentriq) serum pharmacokinetic (PK) and 95 plasma biomarkers were analyzed in 88 patients with relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving atezolizumab i.v. q3w (10-20 mg/kg) in the PCD4989g phase I clinical trial. Following exploratory analyses, two plasma biomarkers were chosen for further study and correlation with change in tumor size (the sum of the longest diameter) was assessed in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) tumor modeling framework. When longitudinal kinetics of biomarkers and tumor size were modeled, tumor shrinkage was found to significantly correlate with area under the curve (AUC), baseline factors (metastatic sites, liver metastases, and smoking status), and relative change in interleukin (IL)-18 level from baseline at day 21 (RCFBIL -18,d21 ). Although AUC was a major predictor of tumor shrinkage, the effect was estimated to dissipate with an average half-life of 80 days, whereas RCFBIL -18,d21 seemed relevant to the duration of the response.
| S-EPMC6704358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Blood-based biomarkers may be particularly useful for patient selection and prediction of treatment response for angiogenesis inhibitors. Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and haematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) might have a role in tumour angiogenesis and in tumour growth. Measurement of CECs and HPCs in the blood of patients could be a simple, non-invasive way to monitor or predict responses to treatment.(VEGFR2(+)) CECs(,) (CD133(+)) HPCs, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and erythropoietin were measured in blood from 25 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and during treatment with sorafenib plus erlotinib (SO/ER). In order to assess the drug specificity of changes in CECs and HPCs, 18 patients treated with bevacizumab plus erlotinib (BV/ER) and 10 patients with erlotinib (ER) monotherapy were studied. Response was measured in all patient groups by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).At day 7, SO/ER-treated patients showed a three-fold increase in CECs (P<0.0001) comparable to BV/ER-treated patients (P<0.01), and the CECs did not change with erlotinib treatment (P=0.8). At day 7, CD133(+)/HPCs decreased with SO/ER treatment (P<0.0001). HPC numbers did not change with either BV/ER or erlotinib. In SO/ER-treated patients pre-treatment CD133(+)/HPCs were significantly lower in responders (P=0.01) and pre-treatment CD133(+)/HPC numbers lower than the median correlated with a longer time-to-progression (TTP) (P=0.037).Pre-treatment CD133(+)/HPCs are a promising candidate biomarker to further explore for use in selecting NSCLC patients who might benefit from SO/ER treatment.
| S-EPMC2816651 | biostudies-other
Project description:ImportanceEvidence regarding real-world effectiveness of therapies for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy is lacking.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab (programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitor) and nivolumab (programmed cell death 1 inhibitor) and the chemotherapy drug docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy.Design, setting, and participantsThis comparative effectiveness study compared patients aged 18 years or older with advanced NSCLC who initiated atezolizumab, docetaxel, or nivolumab and who had previously been exposed to platinum-based chemotherapy using nationally representative real-world data from more than 280 US cancer clinics. Patients were followed-up from May 2011 to March 2020. Data analysis was performed between April and June 2021. Comparisons of interest were between atezolizumab vs docetaxel and atezolizumab vs nivolumab.ExposuresInitiation of atezolizumab, nivolumab, or docetaxel monotherapy.Main outcome and measuresThe main outcome was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 3336 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.1 [9.49] years; 1820 [54.6%] men and 1516 [45.4%] women) were assessed in the main analysis, including 206 patients receiving atezolizumab, 500 receiving docetaxel, and 2630 receiving nivolumab. Patients receiving atezolizumab were older than those treated with docetaxel (mean age [SD], 68.3 [9.4] years vs 65.6 [9.5] years), and were more likely to have been treated in an academic setting (39 patients [18.9%]) than those receiving docetaxel (49 patients [9.8%]) and nivolumab (128 patients [4.9%]). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, atezolizumab was associated with a significantly longer OS compared with docetaxel (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97). No significant difference in OS was observed between atezolizumab and nivolumab (aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28). These findings were consistent across all patient subgroups tested, and robust to plausible deviations from random missingness for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in real-world data (eg, the tipping point for loss of a significantly beneficial effect for atezolizumab vs docetaxel was achieved if patients in the docetaxel group missing baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had a mean performance status of 1.43 higher than expected).Conclusions and relevanceIn this comparative effectiveness study, atezolizumab was superior to docetaxel and matched nivolumab in prolonging OS in a real-world cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC8590169 | biostudies-literature