Dataset Information

Classification and immune invasion analysis of breast cancer based on m6A genes

ABSTRACT:

Background

Breast cancer (BRCA) shows genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic diversity. Methylation of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) affects the occurrence, development, and therapeutic efficacy of BRCA. However, the characteristics and prognostic value of m6A in BRCA remain unclear. We aimed to classify and construct a scoring system for the m6A regulatory gene in BRCA, and to explore its potential mechanisms.

Methods

In this study, we selected 23 m6A regulatory genes and analyzed their genetic variation in BRCA, including copy number variation (CNV) data, expression differences, mutations, gene types, and correlations between genes. Survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method, and a log-rank P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The partitioning around medoids (PAM) algorithm was used for molecular subtype analysis of m6A, single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm was used to quantify the relative infiltration levels of various immune cell subgroups, and a scoring system was built based on principal component analysis (PCA).

Results

In BRCA, m6A regulatory gene mutation frequency is not high, while that of CNV mutation is high, which is related to gene expression and closely related to prognosis. In this study, we identified 3 different m6A subtypes, which are closely related to the level of immune cell infiltration. We further constructed an m6A score system, in which lower scores were correlated with low tumor mutation burden (TMB), later clinical staging, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Conclusions

This study highlights the diversity and complexity of the role of m6A in BRCA. The classification of BRCA based on the m6A regulatory gene can help us understand the characteristics of BRCA and help develop individualized immunotherapy regimens.

SUBMITTER: Qin Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8506726 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundStudies have shown that N6-methyl adenosine (m6A) plays an important role in cancer progression; however, the underlying mechanism of m6A modification in tumor microenvironment (TME) cell infiltration of bladder cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of m6A modification in TME cell infiltration of bladder cancer.MethodsThe RNA expression profile and clinical data of bladder cancer were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus. We assessed the m6A modification patterns of 664 bladder cancer samples based on 20 m6A regulators through unsupervised clustering analysis and systematically linked m6A modification patterns to TME cell infiltration characteristics. Gene ontology and gene set variation analyses were conducted to analyze the underlying mechanism based on the assessment of m6A methylation regulators. Principal component analysis was used to construct the m6A score to quantify m6A modification patterns of bladder cancer.ResultsThe genetic and expression alterations in m6A regulators were highly heterogeneous between normal and bladder tissues. Three m6A modification patterns were identified. The cell infiltration characteristics were highly consistent with the three immune phenotypes, including immune rejection, immune inflammation, and immune desert. The biological functions of three m6A modification patterns were different. Cox regression analyses revealed that the m6A score was an independent signature with patient prognosis (HR = 1.198, 95% CI: 1.031-1.390). Patients with a low-m6A score were characterized by increased tumor mutation burden, PD-L1 expression, and poorer survival. Patients in the low-m6A score group also showed significant immune responses and clinical benefits in the CTLA-4 immunotherapy cohort (p =0.0069).ConclusionsThe m6A methylation modification was related to the formation of TME heterogeneity and complexity. Assessing the m6A modification pattern of individual bladder cancer will improve the understanding of TME infiltration characteristics.

Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy is applied to breast cancer to resolve the limitations of survival gain in existing treatment modalities. With immunotherapy, a tumor can be classified into immune-inflamed, excluded and desert based on the distribution of immune cells. We assessed the clinicopathological features, each subtype's prognostic value and differentially expressed proteins between immune subtypes.MethodsImmune subtyping and proteomic analysis were performed on 56 breast cancer cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The immune subtyping was based on the level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Klintrup criteria. If the level of TILs was ≥ 10%, it was classified as immune-inflamed type without consideration of the Klintrup criteria. In cases of 1-9% TIL, Klintrup criteria 1-3 were classified as the immune-excluded subtype and Klintrup criteria not available (NA) was classified as NA. Cases of 1% TILs and Klintrup 0 were classified as the immune-desert subtype. Mass spectrometry was used to identify differentially expressed proteins in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy tissues.ResultsOf the 56 cases, 31 (55%) were immune-inflamed, 21 (38%) were immune-excluded, 2 (4%) were immune-desert and 2 (4%) were NA. Welch's t-test revealed two differentially expressed proteins between immune-inflamed and immune-excluded/desert subtypes. Coronin-1A was upregulated in immune-inflamed tumors (adjusted p = 0.008) and α-1-antitrypsin was upregulated in immune-excluded/desert tumors (adjusted p = 0.008). Titin was upregulated in pathologic complete response (pCR) than non-pCR among immune-inflamed tumors (adjusted p = 0.036).ConclusionsCoronin-1A and α-1-antitrypsin were upregulated in immune-inflamed and immune-excluded/desert subtypes, respectively. Titin's elevated expression in pCR within the immune-inflamed subtype may indicate a favorable prognosis. Further studies involving large representative cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.