Dataset Information

An Updated Review on Head and Neck Cancer Treatment with Radiation Therapy

ABSTRACT:

Simple Summary

The mainstay of treatment for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is either surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy or definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) reserving surgery as salvage therapy, referred to as the organ-preservation approach. Head and neck cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with medical, surgical, and radiation oncology, pathology, radiology, and supportive services including physical and occupational therapy, speech and swallow therapy, and nutrition. The field has rapidly evolved with rising rates of HPV positive oropharyngeal cancers leading to treatment de-escalation studies that are currently ongoing. Additionally, multiple trials are ongoing to evaluate the role of novel agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors, less invasive surgical approaches, and radiation field and dose reductions in order to maintain effective tumor control while improving quality of life outcomes for our head and neck cancer patients.

Abstract

The complexity of head and neck cancers (HNC) mandates a multidisciplinary approach and radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the optimal management of patients with HNC, either as frontline or adjuvant treatment postoperatively. The advent of both definitive and post-operative RT has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with HNC. Herein, we discuss the role of postoperative RT in different subtypes of HNC, its side effects, and the importance of surveillance. The treatment regions discussed in this paper are the oral cavity, nasopharynx, paranasal sinus cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. Multiple studies that demonstrate the importance of definitive and/or postoperative RT, which led to an improved outlook of survival for HNC patients will be discussed.

SUBMITTER: Anderson G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8508236 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry.MethodsThe study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUDCTV) and organs-at-risk (EUDOAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation.ResultsAltogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUDCTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUDCTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6-99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8-88.7%). While the EUDCTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUDOAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.

Project description:PurposeTo identify which patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may be most improved through adaptive radiation therapy (ART) with the goal of reducing toxicity incidence among head and neck cancer patients.MethodsOne hundred fifty-five head and neck cancer patients receiving radical VMAT (chemo)radiotherapy (66-70 Gy in 30-35 fractions) completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Xerostomia Questionnaire while attending routine follow-up clinics between June-October 2019. Hierarchical clustering characterized symptom endorsement. Conventional statistical approaches indicated associations between dose and commonly reported symptoms. These associations, and the potential benefit of interfractional dose corrections, were further explored via logistic regression.ResultsRadiotherapy-related symptoms were commonly reported (dry mouth, difficulty swallowing/chewing). Clustering identified three patient subgroups reporting: none/mild symptoms for most items (60.6% of patients); moderate/severe symptoms affecting some aspects of general well-being (32.9%); and moderate/severe symptom reporting for most items (6.5%). Clusters of PRO items broadly consisted of acute toxicities, general well-being, and head and neck-specific symptoms (xerostomia, dysphagia). Dose-PRO relationships were strongest between delivered pharyngeal constrictor Dmean and patient-reported dysphagia, with MDADI composite scores (mean ± SD) of 25.7 ± 18.9 for patients with Dmean <50 Gy vs. 32.4 ± 17.1 with Dmean ≥50 Gy. Based on logistic regression models, during-treatment dose corrections back to planned values may confer ≥5% decrease in the absolute risk of self-reported physical dysphagia symptoms ≥1 year post-treatment in 1.2% of patients, with a ≥5% decrease in relative risk in 23.3% of patients.ConclusionsPatient-reported dysphagia symptoms are strongly associated with delivered dose to the pharyngeal constrictor. Dysphagia-focused ART may provide the greatest toxicity benefit to head and neck cancer patients, and represent a potential new direction for ART, given that the existing ART literature has focused almost exclusively on xerostomia reduction.

Project description:ImportanceTrismus is highly prevalent in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship. Current standards for trismus treatment include various stretch-based exercise protocols as a primary and single treatment modality with limited evidence regarding the role of manual therapy (MT) for this indication.ObjectiveTo assess the effect size and associations of response to MT to increase oral opening in the setting of radiation-associated trismus.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective case series was conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and March 2020 (before COVID-19 interruption) and included 49 disease-free survivors of HNC who were referred for treatment of radiation-associated trismus.InterventionIntraoral MT (including or excluding external head and neck) targeting the muscles of mastication.Main outcomes and measuresMaximum interincisal opening (MIO) before and after the initial MT session compared with serial MT sessions. Covariates were examined to determine the association with response to MT for trismus.ResultsA total of 49 survivors of HNC (13 women [27%]; 24 [49%] 64 years or younger; 25 [51%] 65 years or older; mean [range] of 6.6 [0-33] years postradiotherapy were included, 9 [18.4%] of whom underwent a single MT session; 40 [81.6%] who underwent multiple sessions [mean, 6; median (range), 3 (2-48)]). The MIO improved after a single session by a mean (SD) of 4.1 (1.9) mm (0.45 effect size) and after serial MT sessions by a mean (SD) of 6.4 (4.8) mm with an effect size of 0.7. No covariates were found to be clinically meaningfully associated with MIO improvement following MT.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this case series study suggest that MT improved MIO with a medium to large effect size in survivors of HNC with radiation-associated trismus. The results suggest that the largest increase in oral opening was achieved after the initial treatment and although gains were more modest, oral opening continued to improve with serial treatment. Covariates were not associated with MT response, suggesting that patients with clinical features often considered treatment refractory (eg, advanced disease, multiple lines of oncology treatment, ≥5 years posttreatment) may benefit from treatment with MT. Manual therapy may be a beneficial frontline or adjuvant treatment when combined with traditional stretching therapy. A clinically meaningful increase in oral opening has the potential to improve swallow function, speech, pain, and quality of life.

Dataset Information

An Updated Review on Head and Neck Cancer Treatment with Radiation Therapy

Simple Summary

Abstract

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets