Dataset Information

Comparison of CAD and Voxel-Based Modelling Methodologies for the Mechanical Simulation of Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Scaffolds.

ABSTRACT: Porous structures are of great importance in tissue engineering. Most scaffolds are 3D printed, but there is no single methodology to model these printed parts and to apply finite element analysis to estimate their mechanical behaviour. In this work, voxel-based and geometry-based modelling methodologies are defined and compared in terms of computational efficiency, dimensional accuracy, and mechanical behaviour prediction of printed parts. After comparing the volumes and dimensions of the models with the theoretical and experimental ones, they are more similar to the theoretical values because they do not take into account dimensional variations due to the printing temperature. This also affects the prediction of the mechanical behaviour, which is not accurate compared to reality, but it makes it possible to determine which geometry is stiffer. In terms of comparison of modelling methodologies, based on process efficiency, geometry-based modelling performs better for simple or larger parts, while voxel-based modelling is more advantageous for small and complex geometries.

SUBMITTER: Vega G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8510365 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of CAD and Voxel-Based Modelling Methodologies for the Mechanical Simulation of Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Scaffolds.

Vega Gisela G Paz Rubén R Gleadall Andrew A Monzón Mario M Alemán-Domínguez María Elena ME

Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 20210929 19

Porous structures are of great importance in tissue engineering. Most scaffolds are 3D printed, but there is no single methodology to model these printed parts and to apply finite element analysis to estimate their mechanical behaviour. In this work, voxel-based and geometry-based modelling methodologies are defined and compared in terms of computational efficiency, dimensional accuracy, and mechanical behaviour prediction of printed parts. After comparing the volumes and dimensions of the model ...[more]

PMID: 34640068

Similar Datasets

Project description:A composite comprising Ti and NaCl powders was sintered similar to a three-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-customized artificial bone scaffold. Additionally, a proper microstructure of the mimetic scaffold and the optimum processing parameters for its development were analyzed. The mechanical properties of the metal-based porous-structured framework used as an artificial bone scaffold were an optimum replacement for the human bone. Thus, it was confirmed that patient-customized scaffolds could be manufactured via 3D printing. The 3D-printed mimetic specimens were fabricated by a powder-sintering method using Ti for the metal parts, NaCl as the pore former, and polylactic acid as the biodegradable binder. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that pores were formed homogeneously, while X-ray computed tomography confirmed that open pores were generated. The porosity and pore size distribution were measured using a mercury porosimeter, while the flexural strength and flexural elastic modulus were calculated using the three-point bending test. Based on these measurements, a pore-former content of 15 vol % optimized the density and flexural strength to 2.52 g cm-2 and 283 MPa, respectively, similar to those of the actual iliac bone. According to the 3D-printing production method, a selective laser-sintering process was applied for the fabrication of the mimetic specimen, and it was determined that the microstructure and properties similar to those of previous metal specimens could be achieved in the as-prepared specimen. Additionally, a decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) was used to coat the surfaces and interiors of the specimens for evaluating their biocompatibilities. SEM image analysis indicated that the adipose-derived stem cells grew evenly inside the pores of the coated specimens, as compared with the bulky Ti specimens without the dECM coating. The doubling time at 65% was measured at 72, 75, and 83 h for specimens with pore-former contents of 5, 10, and 15 vol %, respectively. The doubling time without the pore former was 116 h. As compared with the specimens without the pore former (73 h), 15% of the dECM-coated specimens showed a doubling time of 64%, measured at 47 h.

Dataset Information

Comparison of CAD and Voxel-Based Modelling Methodologies for the Mechanical Simulation of Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Scaffolds.

Publications

Comparison of CAD and Voxel-Based Modelling Methodologies for the Mechanical Simulation of Extrusion-Based 3D Printed Scaffolds.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets