Incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis globally: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence and prevalence of SSc covering the entire literature.Methods
This study followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of 2009. We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase to identify articles reporting incidence and/or prevalence of SSc. Two authors conducted the search, reviewed articles for inclusion and extracted relevant data. We used random-effects models to estimate the pooled prevalence and incidence of SSc and performed subgroup analyses by sex, case definition and region to investigate heterogeneity. We explored the association between calendar period and reported estimates using meta-regression.Results
Among 6983 unique records identified, we included 61 studies of prevalence and 39 studies of incidence in the systematic review. The overall pooled prevalence of SSc was 17.6 (95% CI 15.1, 20.5) per 100 000 and the overall pooled incidence rate of SSc was 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.9) per 100 000 person-years. We observed significant regional variations in reported estimates; studies conducted in North America reported considerably higher estimates than other regions. The pooled incidence and prevalence in women were five times higher than in men. More recent studies reported higher estimates than older ones.Conclusion
In this comprehensive review of the incidence and prevalence of SSc across the world, there was large heterogeneity among estimates, which should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results.
SUBMITTER: Bairkdar M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8516513 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Primary outcome(s): Colorectal cancer incidence, Colorectal tumor incidence
| 79216 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are particularly susceptible to infections, such as pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). This meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence and prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) in SLE patients. Methods The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched for articles of relevant studies published from the dates the databases were established until April 30, 2022. The I2 statistic and Q test were used to evaluate heterogeneity among the analysed studies. Random-effects models were utilised and subgroup analyses were conducted for analysis of the study data. Results A total of 35 studies with 46,327 SLE patients were eligible for analysis. The incidence and prevalence of TB among the SLE patients were 1.16 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.93) and 3.59% (95% CI: 2.57%-5.02%), respectively. The pooled prevalence of SLE-PTB and SLE-EPTB was 2.46% (95% CI: 1.73%-3.51%) and 1.42% (95% CI: 0.98%-2.06%), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the incidence of SLE-TB was higher in Africa and in countries with a high TB burden than in countries with a low TB burden. The prevalence of SLE-TB was elevated in Asia, in patients taking a mean daily dose of glucocorticoids ≥20 mg, in studies with small sample sizes (n <1000) and ended before 2001. Conclusions The available evidence suggests that both the incidence and prevalence of TB in SLE patients are high. This study provides a more specific understanding of SLE-TB, which can help health policymakers in the development of preventive strategies for reducing the SLE-TB burden.
| S-EPMC9355093 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this systematic review study was to determine the national, regional, and global prevalence of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) vaping.MethodThe articles were searched in July 2020 without a time limit in Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, PubMed, and Ovid-MEDLINE. At first, the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, and if they were appropriate, they entered the second stage of screening. In the second stage, the whole articles were reviewed and articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected. In this study, search, selection of studies, qualitative evaluation, and data extraction were performed by two authors independently, and any disagreement between the two authors was reviewed and corrected by a third author.ResultsIn this study, the lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping globally were 23% and 11%, respectively. Lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in women were 16% and 8%, respectively. Also, lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in men were 22% and 12%, respectively. In this study, the current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in who had lifetime smoked conventional cigarette was 39%, and in current smokers was 43%. The lifetime prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in the Continents of America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania were 24%, 26%, 16%, and 25%, respectively. The current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in the Continents of America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania were 10%, 14%, 11%, and 6%, respectively.ConclusionsBased on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the popularity of e-cigarettes is increasing globally. Therefore, it is necessary for countries to have more control over the consumption and distribution of e-cigarettes, as well as to formulate the laws prohibiting about the e-cigarettes vaping in public places. There is also a need to design and conduct information campaigns to increase community awareness about e-cigarettes vaping.
| S-EPMC9682677 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the periodontal health of systemic sclerosis patients compared with non-systemic sclerosis controls.Materials and methodsOnline databases were searched for eligible studies on February 24, 2023. The primary outcomes of interest in systemic sclerosis patients and controls included the clinical attachment level, periodontal probing depth, recession depth, plaque index, bleeding on probing score, gingival index, number of teeth with periodontitis, prevalence of periodontitis and gingivitis, and extent and severity of periodontitis.ResultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria and were incorporated in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. In comparison with the controls, systemic sclerosis patients had a higher prevalence of periodontitis (OR = 7.63 (1.74-33.50), p = 0.04, I2 = 69%), including more severe forms of periodontitis (OR = 6.68 (3.39-13.15), p = 0.85, I2 = 0%), as well as higher periodontal probing depth ((0.88 (0.45-1.31), p = 0.02, I2 = 99%)), clinical attachment level (1.22 (0.8-1.64), p = 0.003, I2 = 98%), and plaque presence (0.83 (0.13-1.53), p = 0.03, I2 = 96%). There was no statistically significant difference in gingival inflammation (1.14 (0.07-2.21), p = 0.04, I2 = 98%).ConclusionsThe systematic review and the meta-analysis showed that systemic sclerosis patients suffer from worse periodontal health than non-systemic sclerosis individuals.
| S-EPMC10836703 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Primary brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant tumors arising from the brain parenchyma and its surrounding structures. The epidemiology of these tumors is poorly understood. The aim of our study is to systematically review the latest literature on the incidence and prevalence of primary brain tumors.The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to a predetermined protocol and established guidelines. Only studies reporting on data from 1985 onward were included. Articles were included if they met the following criteria: (i) original research, (ii) population based, (iii) reported an incidence or prevalence estimate of primary brain tumors.From the 53 eligible studies overall, 38 were included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model found the overall incidence rate of all brain tumors to be 10.82 (95% CI: 8.63-13.56) per 100 000 person-years. The incidence proportion estimates were heterogeneous, even among the same tumor subtypes, and ranged from 0.051 per 100 000 (germ cell tumors) to 25.48 per 100 000 (all brain tumors). There were insufficient data to conduct a meta-analysis of the prevalence of primary brain tumors.There is a need for more accurate and comparable incidence and prevalence estimates of primary brain tumors across the world. A standardized approach to the study of the epidemiology of these tumors is needed to better understand the burden of brain tumors and the possible geographical variations in their incidence.
| S-EPMC4483114 | biostudies-other
Project description:Patellofemoral pain is considered one of the most common forms of knee pain, affecting adults, adolescents, and physically active populations. Inconsistencies in reported incidence and prevalence exist and in relation to the allocation of healthcare and research funding, there is a clear need to accurately understand the epidemiology of patellofemoral pain.An electronic database search was conducted, as well as grey literature databases, from inception to June 2017. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and appraised methodological quality. If heterogeneous, data were analysed descriptively. Where studies were homogeneous, data were pooled through a meta-analysis.23 studies were included. Annual prevalence for patellofemoral pain in the general population was reported as 22.7%, and adolescents as 28.9%. Incidence rates in military recruits ranged from 9.7-571.4/1,000 person-years, amateur runners in the general population at 1080.5/1,000 person-years and adolescents amateur athletes 5.1%-14.9% over 1 season. One study reported point prevalence within military populations as 13.5%. The pooled estimate for point prevalence in adolescents was 7.2% (95% Confidence Interval: 6.3%-8.3%), and in female only adolescent athletes was 22.7% (95% Confidence Interval 17.4%-28.0%).This review demonstrates high incidence and prevalence levels for patellofemoral pain. Within the context of this, and poor long term prognosis and high disability levels, PFP should be an urgent research priority.CRD42016038870.
| S-EPMC5764329 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceTo date, no systematic review has taken a meta-analytic approach to estimating the prevalence and incidence of tinnitus in the general population.ObjectiveTo provide frequency estimates of tinnitus worldwide.Data sourcesAn umbrella review followed by a traditional systematic review was performed by searching PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase from inception through November 19, 2021.Study selectionResearch data from the general population were selected, and studies based on patients or on subgroups of the population with selected lifestyle habits were excluded. No restrictions were applied according to date, age, sex, and country.Data extraction and synthesisRelevant extracted information included type of study, time and location, end point, population characteristics, and tinnitus definition. The study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline.Main outcomes and measuresPooled prevalence estimates of any tinnitus, severe tinnitus, chronic tinnitus, and diagnosed tinnitus as well as incidence of tinnitus were obtained using random-effects meta-analytic models; heterogeneity between studies was controlled using the χ2 test, and inconsistency was measured using the I2 statistic.ResultsAmong 767 publications, 113 eligible articles published between 1972 and 2021 were identified, and prevalence estimates from 83 articles and incidence estimates from 12 articles were extracted. The pooled prevalence of any tinnitus among adults was 14.4% (95% CI, 12.6%-16.5%) and ranged from 4.1% (95% CI, 3.7%-4.4%) to 37.2% (95% CI, 34.6%-39.9%). Prevalence estimates did not significantly differ by sex (14.1% [95% CI, 11.6%-17.0%] among male individuals; 13.1% [95% CI, 10.5%-16.2%] among female individuals), but increased prevalence was associated with age (9.7% [95% CI, 7.4%-12.5%] among adults aged 18-44 years; 13.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-17.0%] among those aged 45-64 years; and 23.6% [95% CI, 19.4%-28.5%] among those aged ≥65 years; P < .001 among age groups). The pooled prevalence of severe tinnitus was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.1%), ranging from 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.7%) to 12.6% (95% CI, 11.1%-14.1%). The pooled prevalence of chronic tinnitus was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.7%-19.3%) and the pooled prevalence of diagnosed tinnitus was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-5.5%). The pooled incidence rate of any tinnitus was 1164 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 479-2828 per 100 000 person-years).Conclusions and relevanceDespite the substantial heterogeneity among studies, this comprehensive systematic review on the prevalence and incidence of tinnitus suggests that tinnitus affects more than 740 million adults globally and is perceived as a major problem by more than 120 million people, mostly aged 65 years or older. Health policy makers should consider the global burden of tinnitus, and greater effort should be devoted to boost research on tinnitus.
| S-EPMC9361184 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication for individuals with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The purpose of this study was to complete a systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and risk factors of SSc-ILD in East Asia.MethodsMedline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 22, 2021. The Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was applied to access the methodological quality of the eligible studies. Study characteristics and magnitude of effect sizes were extracted. Then, we calculated the pooled prevalence, weighted mean differences (WMDs), pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and performed subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias with Egger's test.ResultsTwenty-seven of 1584 articles were eligible and a total of 5250 patients with SSc were selected in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of SSc-ILD in East Asia was 56% (95% CI 49%-63%). The SSc-ILD prevalence was higher in China (72%) than in Japan (46%) and Korea (51%). Longer disease duration (WMD = 1.97, 95% CI 0.55-3.38), diffuse SSc (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.91-4.21), positive anti-topoisomerase I antibody (ATA) (OR = 4.92, 95% CI 2.74-8.84), positive anti-centromere body antibody (ACA) (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.25), positive anti-U3 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) antibody (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.66), and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (WMD = 6.62, 95% CI 1.19-12.05) were associated with SSc-ILD in East Asia.ConclusionThrough this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that ILD occurs in up to approximately 56% of patients with SSc in East Asia. Longer disease duration, diffuse SSc, positive ATA, negative ACA, negative anti-U3 RNP antibody, and higher ESR were risk factors for SSc-ILD.
| S-EPMC9292335 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have an increased risk of endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events compared to the general population. Therefore, the availability of robust circulating biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis may facilitate early recognition and management of cardiovascular risk in SSc. We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating various types of circulating cell adhesion molecules involved in endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis (i.e., immunoglobulin-like vascular cell, VCAM-1, intercellular, ICAM-1, platelet endothelial cell, PECAM-1, neural cell, NCAM, Down syndrome cell, DSCAM, and endothelial cell-selective, ESAM, adhesion molecules, E-, L-, and P-selectin, integrins, and cadherins) in SSc patients and healthy controls. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 1 May 2024. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using validated tools. In 43 eligible studies, compared to controls, patients with SSc had significantly higher plasma or serum concentrations of ICAM-1 (standard mean difference, SMD=1.16, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.44, p<0.001; moderate certainty), VCAM-1 (SMD=1.09, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.46, p<0.001; moderate certainty), PECAM-1 (SMD=1.65, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.98, p=0.014; very low certainty), E-selectin (SMD=1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.62, p<0.001; moderate certainty), and P-selectin (SMD=1.10, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.90, p=0.007; low certainty). There were no significant between-group differences in L-selectin concentrations (SMD=-0.35, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.32, p=0.31; very low certainty), whereas minimal/no evidence was available for cadherins, NCAM, DSCAM, ESAM, or integrins. Overall, no significant associations were observed between the effect size and various patient and study characteristics in meta-regression and subgroup analyses. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that specific circulating cell adhesion molecules, i.e., ICAM-1, VCAM-1, PECAM-1, E-selectin, and P-selectin, can be helpful as biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in SSc patients. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024549710.
| S-EPMC11371573 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults worldwide and approximately half of those affected are in Europe. The assessment of differential incidence and prevalence across populations can reveal spatial, temporal and demographic patterns which are important for identifying genetic and environmental factors contributing to MS. However, study methodologies vary and the quality of the methods can influence the estimates. This study aimed to systematically review European studies of incidence and prevalence of MS and to provide a quantitative assessment of their methodological quality.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed to obtain all original population-based studies of MS incidence and prevalence in European populations conducted and published between January 1985 and January 2011. Only peer-reviewed full-text articles published in English or French were included. All abstracts were screened for eligibility and two trained reviewers abstracted the data and graded the quality of each study using a tool specifically designed for this study.ResultsThere were 123 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The study estimates were highly heterogeneous, even within regions or countries. Quality was generally higher in the more recent studies, which also tended to use current diagnostic criteria. Prevalence and incidence estimates tended to be higher in the more recent studies and were higher in the Nordic countries and in northern regions of the British Isles. With rare exceptions, prevalence and incidence estimates were higher in women with ratios as high as 3:1. Few studies examined ethnicity. Epidemiological data at the national level was uncommon and there were marked geographical disparities in available data, with large areas of Europe unrepresented and other regions well-represented in the literature. Only 37% of the studies provided standardized estimates.ConclusionsDespite the breadth of the literature on the epidemiology of MS in Europe, inter-study comparisons are hampered by the lack of standardization. Further research should focus on regions not yet studied and the evaluation of ethnic differences in MS prevalence and incidence. National-level studies using current diagnostic criteria, validated case definitions and similar age- and sex-standardization would allow better geographical comparisons.
| S-EPMC3856596 | biostudies-literature