Association Between Blood Pressure Variability With Dementia and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: de Heus RAA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8516811 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Association Between Blood Pressure Variability With Dementia and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
de Heus Rianne A A RAA Tzourio Christophe C Lee Emily Jo Lynn EJL Opozda Melissa M Vincent Andrew D AD Anstey Kaarin J KJ Hofman Albert A Kario Kazuomi K Lattanzi Simona S Launer Lenore J LJ Ma Yuan Y Mahajan Rajiv R Mooijaart Simon P SP Nagai Michiaki M Peters Ruth R Turnbull Deborah D Yano Yuichiro Y Claassen Jurgen A H R JAHR Tully Phillip J PJ
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) 20210920 5
[Figure: see text]. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundA body of empirical work demonstrates that wide fluctuations in a person's blood pressure across consecutive measures, known as blood pressure variability (BPV), hold prognostic value to predict stroke and transient ischemic attack. However, the magnitude of association between BPV and other neurological outcomes remains less clear. This systematic review aims to pool together data regarding BPV with respect to incident dementia, cognitive impairment, and cognitive function.MethodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS) will be searched for the key words blood pressure variability and outcomes of dementia, cognitive impairment, and cognitive function. Authors and reference lists of included studies will also be contacted to identify additional published and unpublished studies. Eligibility criteria are as follows: population-adult humans (over 18 years but with no upper age limit) without dementia at baseline, with or without elevated blood pressure, or from hypertensive populations (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drug for hypertension) and from primary care, community cohort, electronic database registry, or randomized controlled trial (RCT); exposure-any metric of BPV (systolic, diastolic or both) over any duration; comparison-persons without dementia who do not have elevated BPV; and outcome-dementia, cognitive impairment, cognitive function at follow-up from standardized neurological assessment, or cognitive testing. Article screening will be undertaken by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extraction will include original data specified as hazard ratios, odds ratios, correlations, regression coefficients, and original cell data if available. Risk of bias assessment will be undertaken by two independent reviewers. Meta-analytic methods will be used to synthesize the data collected relating to the neurological outcomes with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0 (Biostat Inc., Engelwood, NJ).DiscussionThis systematic review aims to clarify whether BPV is associated with elevated risk for dementia, cognitive impairment, and cognitive function. An evaluation of the etiological links between BPV with incident dementia might inform evidence-based clinical practice and policy concerning blood pressure measurement and hypertension management. The review will identify sources of heterogeneity and may inform decisions on whether it is feasible and desirable to proceed with an individual participant data meta-analysis.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42017081977.
| S-EPMC6190539 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceThe benefit of blood pressure lowering for the prevention of dementia or cognitive impairment is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the association of blood pressure lowering with dementia or cognitive impairment.Data sources and study selectionSearch of PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized clinical trials published from database inception through December 31, 2019, that evaluated the association of blood pressure lowering on cognitive outcomes. The control groups consisted of either placebo, alternative antihypertensive agents, or higher blood pressure targets.Data extraction and synthesisData were screened and extracted independently by 2 authors. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to report pooled treatment effects and CIs.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was dementia or cognitive impairment. The secondary outcomes were cognitive decline and changes in cognitive test scores.ResultsFourteen randomized clinical trials were eligible for inclusion (96 158 participants), of which 12 reported the incidence of dementia (or composite of dementia and cognitive impairment [3 trials]) on follow-up and were included in the primary meta-analysis, 8 reported cognitive decline, and 8 reported changes in cognitive test scores. The mean (SD) age of trial participants was 69 (5.4) years and 40 617 (42.2%) were women. The mean systolic baseline blood pressure was 154 (14.9) mm Hg and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 83.3 (9.9) mm Hg. The mean duration of follow-up was 49.2 months. Blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a reduced risk of dementia or cognitive impairment (12 trials; 92 135 participants) (7.0% vs 7.5% of patients over a mean trial follow-up of 4.1 years; odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98]; absolute risk reduction, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.09%-0.68%]; I2 = 0.0%) and cognitive decline (8 trials) (20.2% vs 21.1% of participants over a mean trial follow-up of 4.1 years; OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99]; absolute risk reduction, 0.71% [95% CI, 0.19%-1.2%]; I2 = 36.1%). Blood pressure lowering was not significantly associated with a change in cognitive test scores.Conclusions and relevanceIn this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive agents compared with control was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident dementia or cognitive impairment.
| S-EPMC7237983 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo identify the association between albuminuria and dementia or cognitive impairment.MethodsThe literature search was performed to identify relevant scientific studies through August 2019, including PubMed/Medline and EMBASE. For inclusion, the studies had to fulfil the following criteria: population-based cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies; quantifying an association of albuminuria with cognitive impairment or dementia; and reported odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidential interval (95% CI). Random effects model was used to yield pooled estimates.ResultsA total of 16 studies (11 cohort studies and five cross-sectional studies) were included in the meta-analyses. Based on the fully adjusted estimates, albuminuria was associated with a significant higher risk of cognitive impairment or dementia. Furthermore, the same trend existed for cognitive impairment and dementia, respectively. In addition, both of Alzheimer's diseases (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) were significantly associated with albuminuria.ConclusionAlbuminuria was significantly associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. Corresponding to an earlier subclinical time-point in kidney disease progress, albuminuria may be a potential factor predicting the future occurrence of dementia.
| S-EPMC8738457 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate whether nocturnal blood pressure fall, expressed by dipping patterns according to 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), is associated with abnormal cognitive function (cognitive impairment or dementia).MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify original articles through December 2022. We included any study with at least ten participants reporting on all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment incidence (primary outcome) or validated cognitive tests (secondary outcome) among ABPM patterns. We assessed risk of bias using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. We pooled odds ratios (OR) and standardized mean differences (SMD) using random-effect models for primary and secondary outcome, respectively.ResultsIn the qualitative synthesis, 28 studies examining 7595 patients were included. The pooled analysis of 18 studies showed that dippers had a 51% [OR 0.49(0.35-0.69)] lower risk of abnormal cognitive function and a 63% [OR 0.37(0.23-0.61)] lower risk of dementia alone, compared to non-dippers. Reverse dippers presented an up to sixfold higher risk [OR 6.06(3.15-11.64)] of abnormal cognitive function compared to dippers and an almost twofold higher risk [OR 1.81(1.26-2.6)] compared to non-dippers. Reverse dippers performed worse in global function neuropsychological tests compared with both dippers [SMD - 0.66(- 0.93 to - 0.39)] and non-dippers [SMD - 0.35(- 0.53 to - 0.16)].ConclusionDysregulation of the normal circadian BP rhythm, specifically non-dipping and reverse dipping is associated with abnormal cognitive function. Further studies are required to determine potential underlying mechanisms and possible prognostic or therapeutic implications.Protocol registrationPROSPERO database (ID: CRD42022310384).
| S-EPMC10115699 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesHigh visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) was found to be associated with cognitive decline in the elderly. This study aimed to investigate the impact of visit-to-visit BPV on cognition in patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD).DesignThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.Setting and participantsA total of 297 patients with early-stage PD (103 mild cognitive impairments [PD-MCI] and 194 normal cognitions [PD-NC] at baseline) were included from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative study.MethodsVariation independent of mean (VIM) of the first year was used as the indicator of BPV. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess global cognition. Patients were divided into PD-MCI and PD-NC according to the MoCA score at baseline. Longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ-42, Aβ, α-synuclein, neurofilament light protein, tau phosphorylated at the threonine 181 position, total tau, glial fibrillary acidic protein) and serum (neurofilament light protein) biomarkers were assessed. The Bayesian linear growth model was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline BPV and the rate of change in cognition and biomarkers.ResultsHigher systolic VIM of the first year was related to a greater rate of decline in MoCA score in the following years in PD-MCI (β = -.15 [95% CI -.29, -.01]). No association was found between BPV and biomarkers.Conclusion and implicationsHigher systolic VIM predicted a steeper decline in cognitive tests in PD-MCI independently from the mean value of blood pressure, orthostatic hypotension, and supine hypertension.
| S-EPMC10726805 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Research links blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke; however, the association with cerebral small-vessel disease (CSVD) remains unclear. As BPV and mean blood pressure are interrelated, it remains uncertain whether BPV adds additional information to understanding cerebrovascular morphological characteristics. Methods and Results A systematic review was performed from inception until March 3, 2019. Eligibility criteria included population, adults without stroke (<4 weeks); exposure, BPV quantified by any metric over any duration; comparison, (1) low versus high or mean BPV and (2) people with versus without CSVD; and outcomes, (1) CSVD as subcortical infarct, lacunae, white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, or enlarged perivascular spaces; and (2) standardized mean difference in BPV. A total of 27 articles were meta-analyzed, comprising 12 309 unique brain scans. A total of 31 odds ratios (ORs) were pooled, indicating that higher systolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42; I2=85%) independent of mean systolic pressure. Likewise, higher diastolic BPV was associated with higher odds for CSVD (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48; I2=53%) independent of mean diastolic pressure. There was no evidence of a pairwise interaction between systolic/diastolic and BPV/mean ORs (P=0.47), nor a difference between BPV versus mean pressure ORs (P=0.58). Fifty-four standardized mean differences were pooled and provided similar results for pairwise interaction (P=0.38) and difference between standardized mean differences (P=0.70). Conclusions On the basis of the available studies, BPV was associated with CSVD independent of mean blood pressure. However, more high-quality longitudinal data are required to elucidate whether BPV contributes unique variance to CSVD morphological characteristics.
| S-EPMC6988154 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) and hypertension are risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and probable dementia (PD). Few articles assessed the effect of BPV on the MCI and PD in intensive blood pressure treatment and the different functions of three types of visit-to-visit BPV: systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV), diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV) and pulse pressure variability (PPV).MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of the SPRINT MIND trial. The primary outcomes were MCI and PD. BPV was measured by average real variability (ARV). The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to clarify the difference in tertiles of BPV. We fit Cox proportional hazards models to our outcome. We also did an interaction analysis between the intensive and standard groups.ResultsWe enrolled 8,346 patients in the SPRINT MIND trial. The incidence of MCI and PD in the intensive group was lower than that in the standard group. 353 patients had MCI and 101 patients had PD in the standard group while 285 patients had MCI and 75 patients had PD in the intensive group. Tertiles with higher SBPV, DBPV and PPV in the standard group had a higher risk of MCI and PD (all p < 0.05). Meanwhile, higher SBPV and PPV in the intensive group were associated with an increased risk of PD (SBPV: HR(95%) = 2.1 (1.1-3.9), p = 0.026; PPV: HR(95%) = 2.0 (1.1-3.8), p = 0.025 in model 3) and higher SBPV in the intensive group was associated with an increased risk of MCI(HR(95%) = 1.4 (1.2-1.8), p < 0.001 in model 3). The difference between intensive and standard blood pressure treatment was not statistically significant when we considered the effect of the higher BPV on the risk of MCI and PD (all p for interaction >0.05).ConclusionIn this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT MIND trial, we found that higher SBPV and PPV were associated with an increased risk of PD in the intensive group, and higher SBPV was associated with an increased risk of MCI in the intensive group. The effect of higher BPV on the risk of MCI and PD was not significantly different in intensive and standard blood pressure treatment. These findings emphasized the need for clinical work to monitor BPV in intensive blood pressure treatment.
| S-EPMC10150011 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index is an alternative index of insulin resistance (IR). We aimed to clarify the relationship between the TyG index and cognitive impairment and dementia.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until February 2023 to identify relevant studies. Random-effects models were used to pool effect sizes, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of the evidence.ResultsTen studies were included, with seven of which investigated the relationship between the TyG index and cognitive impairment and three exploring the association between the TyG index and dementia. When the TyG index was described as a categorical variable, it was positively associated with the risk of cognitive impairment (OR = 2.32; 95% CI 1.39-3.87) and dementia (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.12-1.16). The association of the TyG index with the risk of cognitive impairment (OR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.67-6.84) and dementia (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.83) remained significant for per 1 unit increment in the TyG index. The GRADE assessment indicated a very low certainty for cognitive impairment. Low certainty and moderate certainty were observed for dementia when the TyG index was analyzed as a categorical variable and as a continuous variable, respectively.ConclusionThe TyG index is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, Protocol registration number: CRD42023388028.
| S-EPMC10757637 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Given their potent antioxidation properties, carotenoids play a role in delaying and preventing dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, observational studies have found inconsistent results regarding the associations between blood carotenoid levels and the risk of dementia and MCI. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between blood carotenoid levels and the risk of dementia and MCI. A systematic search was performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases to retrieve relevant English articles published from their inception until February 23, 2023. Study quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses. Ultimately, 23 studies (n = 6610) involving 1422 patients with dementia, 435 patients with MCI, and 4753 controls were included. Our meta-analysis showed that patients with dementia had lower blood lycopene (SMD: -0.521; 95%CI: -0.741, -0.301), α-carotene (SMD: -0.489; 95%CI: -0.697, -0.281), β-carotene (SMD: -0.476; 95%CI: -0.784, -0.168), lutein (SMD: -0.516; 95%CI: -0.753, -0.279), zeaxanthin (SMD: -0.571; 95%CI: -0.910, -0.232) and β-cryptoxanthin (SMD: -0.617; 95%CI: -0.953, -0.281) than the controls. Our results indicated that blood carotenoid levels were significantly lower in patients with dementia than in controls, despite high heterogeneity across the studies. Owing to insufficient data, we did not observe a similar and stable relationship between blood carotenoid levels and MCI. Our meta-analysis indicated that lower blood carotenoid levels may be a risk factor for dementia and MCI.
| S-EPMC10064563 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCognitive function is a concern among the elderly, which is related to the quality of life, life expectancy, and economic burdens. The relationship between blood pressure (BP) control status, visit-to-visit BP variability, and cognitive function remains controversial.MethodsWe aimed to explore the association between BP control status at baseline, visit-to-visit BP variability, and cognitive function. This study included 3,511 elderlies in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, covering four waves for 7-year follow-up (baseline 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018). BP was measured in Wave 2011, 2013, and 2015. Cognitive function was measured by Mini-Mental State Exam in Wave 2018. Participants were divided into two groups: mid-old group for reflecting midlife BP and cognition (45-59 years at baseline but aged 60 or over in Wave 2018), and old-old group for reflecting late-life BP and cognition (aged 60 or over at baseline). We use univariate analysis and general linear model to analyze.ResultsLate-life BP showed stronger associations with cognitive function than midlife BP. As to late-life BP control status, controlled hypertension group get higher cognitive score than uncontrolled hypertension group in language (adjusted β = -0.34, 95%CI -0.68 to 0.00), and untreated hypertension group in orientation (adjusted β = -0.41, 95%CI -0.72 to -0.11), language (adjusted β = -0.35, 95%CI -0.67 to -0.04), and total (adjusted β = -0.99, 95%CI -1.85 to -0.12). Regarding visit-to-visit BP variability, midlife visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability was associated with language (adjusted β = -3.70, 95% CI -5.83 to -1.57), while late-life visit-to-visit SBP variability was associated with orientation (adjusted β = -2.99, 95% CI -4.84 to -1.14), recall (adjusted β = -1.69, 95% CI -2.89 to -0.48), language (adjusted β = -2.26, 95% CI -4.13 to -0.38), and total (adjusted β = -9.50, 95% CI -14.71 to -4.28); Midlife diastolic blood pressure (DBP) variability and pulse pressure (PP) variability showed a significant relationship with language (adjusted β = 3.25, 95% CI -1.31 to -5.19) and calculation (adjusted β = -0.26, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.04), respectively. No significant correlation was found between midlife BP control status, late-life visit-to-visit DBP variability, late-life visit-to-visit PP variability, and cognitive score. There was no significant correlation between BP and memory.ConclusionsBP control status and visit-to-visit BP variability were significantly related to cognitive function among the Chinese elderly. Receiving effective late-life antihypertensive treatment and keeping SBP stable might contribute to prevent the development of cognitive impairment and dementia, especially for orientation and language function.
| S-EPMC9386068 | biostudies-literature