Dataset Information

Comparing the controlled attenuation parameter using FibroScan and attenuation imaging with ultrasound as a novel measurement for liver steatosis

ABSTRACT:

Background/Aims

In a recent study, attenuation imaging (ATI) with ultrasound was used as a new approach for detecting liver steatosis. However, although there are many studies on ATI and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) that prove their practicability, there are few studies comparing these two methods. As such, this study compared CAP and ATI for the detection and evaluation of liver steatosis.

Methods

A prospective analysis of 28 chronic liver disease patients who underwent liver biopsy, FibroScan® imaging, and ATI with ultrasound was conducted. The presence and degree of steatosis, as measured with the FibroScan® device and ATI, were compared with the pathological results obtained using liver biopsy.

Results

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ATI and CAP for differentiating between normal and hepatic steatosis were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83–1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.81–0.99), respectively. ATI has a higher AUROC than CAP does in liver steatosis, at 0.99 (95% CI, 0.86–1.00) versus 0.91 (95% CI, 0.74–0.98) in grade ≥ 2 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.82–1.00) versus 0.88 (95% CI, 0.70–0.97) in grade = 3, respectively.

Conclusion

The ATI and CAP results showed good consistency and accuracy for the steatosis grading when compared with the liver biopsy results. Moreover, ATI is even better than CAP in patients with moderate or severe steatosis. Therefore, ATI represents a non-invasive and novel diagnostic tool with which to support the diagnosis of liver steatosis in clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Hsu P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8519468 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUltrasound attenuation analysis (USAT) is a type of novel ultrasound attenuation imaging that can be used to detect hepatic steatosis based on the attenuation coefficient. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for assessing the severity of liver steatosis by USAT using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) as a reference in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infections.MethodsIn total, 326 consecutive subjects with or without chronic liver diseases were enrolled in this study who underwent CAP examination and USAT to evaluate hepatic steatosis from October 2022 to November 2022 at The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Hepatic steatosis stage (S) was determined by CAP according to the following cut-off values recommended by the manufacturer: S ≥ S1 (≥11%, mild): 238 dB/m; S ≥ S2 (≥34%, moderate): 259 dB/m; and S ≥ S3 (≥67%, severe): 292 dB/m, and thus the optimal cut-off values for the USAT were acquired. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the categories of steatosis were used to measure the diagnostic accuracy of USAT.ResultsA total of 296 patients were recruited, including 101 (34.1%) patients with NAFLD, 172 (58.1%) with CHB and the remainder were healthy control subjects (7.8%). We used the CAP as the reference standard and found that the USAT increased gradually as the stage of steatosis increased (P<0.001). A strong positive correlation was found between USAT and CAP (r=0.787, P<0.001). In the whole population, the AUROCs of the USAT for S ≥ S1, S ≥ S2 and S ≥ 3 were 0.89, 0.90, and 0.90, respectively, and the cut-off values according to the Youden index for S ≥ S1, S ≥ S2, and S ≥ 3 were 0.62, 0.66, and 0.72 dB/cm/MHz, respectively. Our study showed that the USAT had a good ability to detect hepatic steatosis in NAFLD and CHB patients.ConclusionsUSAT had a strong association with CAP and a good diagnostic capability in the detection of hepatic steatosis, which appears to be a promising tool for the non-invasive detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Hepatic steatosis is common in HIV-infected individuals. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is the preferred noninvasive method for hepatic steatosis measurement but is expensive. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) also assesses hepatic steatosis and is conveniently performed concomitantly with transient elastography. We aimed to assess the accuracy of CAP in the setting of HIV infection. DESIGN:Cross-sectional study. METHODS:CAP and MRS were performed in 82 study participants (39 HIV monoinfected; seven hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfected; 21?HIV/HCV coinfected; 15 with neither infection). We used concordance correlation coefficients to compare log-transformed and standardized CAP and MRS values and linear regression to examine factors associated with CAP and MRS-measured hepatic steatosis (MRS-HS). The accuracy of CAP to detect at least mild hepatic steatosis, defined as MRS-liver fat fraction more than 0.05, and the factors associated with discordance between CAP and MRS were evaluated. RESULTS:Overall, CAP-measured hepatic steatosis and MRS-HS correlated moderately well (rc?=?0.63; P?<?0.001), and correlation was strongest in the HIV-monoinfected group (rc?=?0.67; P?<?0.001). Body composition factors (higher BMI, waist circumference, visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue) and insulin resistance were significantly associated with both greater CAP-measured hepatic steatosis and MRS-HS. Using a validated CAP cut-off of at least 238?dB/m, sensitivity and specificity for at least mild hepatic steatosis were 84% and 75% in the entire cohort; 89% and 80% in the HIV-monoinfected group. Participants with higher body composition parameters were more likely to be misclassified as having hepatic steatosis by CAP. CONCLUSION:Our findings suggest CAP is an acceptable noninvasive surrogate for hepatic steatosis in HIV-infected individuals but may overestimate hepatic steatosis prevalence, especially in individuals with high BMI. Evaluation of factors that improve CAP accuracy and determination of optimal cut-offs are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe consistency in steatosis grading between magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) before and after treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of steatosis grading between MRI-PDFF and CAP using liver biopsy as standard and to evaluate the value of monitoring changes in steatosis grading with CAP during follow-up utilizing MRI-PDFF as a reference.MethodsConsecutive patients from a biopsy cohort and a randomized controlled trial were included in this study and classified into 3 groups (the biopsy, orlistat treatment, and routine treatment subgroups). Hepatic steatosis was measured via MRI-PDFF and CAP at baseline and at the 6th month; the accuracy and cutoffs were assessed in the liver biopsy cohort at baseline.ResultsA total of 209 consecutive patients were enrolled. MRI-PDFF and CAP showed comparable diagnostic accuracy for detecting pathological steatosis [⩾S1, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.984 and 0.972, respectively]; in contrast, CAP presented significantly lower AUCs in grades S2-3 and S3 (0.820 and 0.815, respectively). The CAP values correlated well with the MRI-PDFF values at baseline and at the 6th month (r = 0.809 and 0.762, respectively, both p < 0.001), whereas a moderate correlation in their changes (r = 0.612 and 0.524 for moderate-severe and mild steatosis, respectively; both p < 0.001) was observed. The AUC of CAP change was obtained to predict MRI-PDFF changes of ⩾5% and ⩾10% (0.685 and 0.704, p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The diagnostic agreement of steatosis grade changes between MRI-PDFF and CAP was weak (κ = 0.181, p = 0.001).ConclusionsCAP has decreased value for the initial screening of moderate-severe steatosis and is limited in monitoring changes in steatosis during treatment. The confirmation of steatosis grading with MRI-PDFF remains necessary.

Project description:BackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic liver disease, and among the non-invasive tests, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have shown better diagnostic performance in NAFLD. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of CAP and LSM for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for relevant articles published up to February 13th, 2022, and selected studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the quality of evidence. Then we pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. A random effect model was applied regardless of heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to explore heterogeneity, and Fagan plot analysis was used to evaluate clinical utility. This meta-analysis was completed in Nanjing, Jiangsu and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309965).FindingsA total of 10537 patients from 61 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The AUROC of CAP were 0·924, 0·794 and 0·778 for steatosis grades ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, respectively, and the AUROC of LSM for detecting fibrosis stages ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and = F4 were 0·851, 0·830, 0·897 and 0·925, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² had lower accuracy for diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 than BMI<30 kg/m². For the mean cut-off values, significant differences were found in CAP values among different body mass index (BMI) populations and LSM values among different regions. For diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, the mean CAP cut-off values for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² were 30·7, 28·2, and 27·9 dB/m higher than for BMI < 30 kg/m² (P = 0·001, 0·001 and 0·018, respectively). For diagnosing F ≥ F2 and = F4, the mean cut-off values of Europe and America were 0·96 and 2·03 kPa higher than Asia (P = 0·027, P = 0·034), respectively. In addition, the results did not change significantly after sensitivity analysis and the trim and fill method to correct for publication bias, proving that the conclusions are robust.InterpretationThe good performance of CAP and LSM for the diagnosis of mild steatosis (S ≥ S1), advanced liver fibrosis (F ≥ F3), and cirrhosis (F = F4) can be used to screen for NAFLD in high-risk populations. Of note, the accuracy of CAP for the detection of steatosis in patients with obesity is reduced and requires specific diagnostic values. For LSM, the same diagnostic values can be used when the appropriate probes are selected based on BMI and the automated probe selection tool. The performance of CAP and LSM in assessing steatosis in patients with obesity, moderate to severe steatosis, and low-grade fibrosis should be further validated and improved in the future.FundingThe study was funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).