Timing of the first cannulation and survival of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Lin SJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8519537 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:(1) Background: A functional shunt is critical to hemodialysis, but the ideal timing of shunt cannulation is still not established. In this study, we assessed the association between ideal puncture timing and shunt survival. (2) Methods: This retrospective cohort study using data from the Taiwan Health and Welfare database, which included 26885 hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistulas from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2012. Fistulas were categorized by functional maturation time, defined as the time from the date of shunt construction to the first successful cannulation. Functional cumulative survival, measured as the duration from the first puncture to shunt abandonment, was mainly regarded. (3) Results: The fistulas created between 91 and 180 days prior to the first cannulation had significantly greater cumulative functional survival (HR 0.883; 95% CI 0.792⁻0.984), and there was no more benefit on their survival from waiting more than 180 days (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.853⁻1.073) for shunt maturity. (4) Conclusions: Our results showed that to achieve better long-term shunt survivals, fistulas should be constructed at least 90 days before starting hemodialysis. Notably, there was no additional benefit on waiting more than 180 days prior to cannulation.
| S-EPMC6406680 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Rationale & objectiveArteriovenous fistula cannulation with the buttonhole technique is often preferred by patients but has been associated with an increased infection risk. Guidelines disagree on whether it should be abandoned, thus we assessed a technologically simple method to facilitate gentler arteriovenous fistula cannulation with potentially less discomfort and damage to the epithelial lining of the buttonhole tract.Study design8-week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial.Setting & participantsPatients with buttonhole tracts receiving hemodialysis at 7 dialysis centers in Norway were randomized to the intervention group (43 patients, 658 cannulations) or control group (40 patients, 611 cannulations).InterventionDirection and angle of the established buttonhole tract were marked on the forearm skin in the intervention group, whereas the control group had no structured cannulation information system.OutcomesThe primary outcome was successful cannulation, defined as correct placement of both blunt needles at the first attempt without needing to change needles, perform extra perforations, or reposition the needle. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported difficulty of cannulation (verbal rating scale: 1 = very easy, 6 = impossible) and intensity of pain (numeric rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).ResultsAfter a 2-week run-in period, successful cannulation was achieved in 73.9% and 74.8% of the patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.12; P = 0.85). However, the probability of a difficult arterial cannulation (verbal rating scale, 3-6) was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = 0.001). There were no improvements for venous cannulations. Furthermore, the probability of a painful cannulation (numeric rating scale, 3-10) was lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02; P = 0.06).LimitationsUnable to evaluate hard end points such as infections and thrombosis owing to the small sample size.ConclusionsMarking direction and angle of cannulation did not improve cannulation success rates; however, patients more often reported an unproblematic procedure and less pain.FundingNone.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01536548).
| S-EPMC8861953 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Half of surgically created arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) require additional intervention to effectively support hemodialysis. Postoperative care and complications may affect clinical maturation. STUDY DESIGN:Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation (HFM) Study, a 7-center prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS:491 patients with single-stage AVFs who had neither thrombosis nor AVF intervention before a 6-week postoperative ultrasonographic examination and who required maintenance hemodialysis. PREDICTORS:Postoperative care processes and complications. OUTCOMES:Attempted cannulation, successful cannulation, and unassisted and overall clinical maturation as defined by the HFM Study criteria. RESULTS:AVF cannulation was attempted in 443 of 491 (90.2%) participants and was eventually successful in 430 of these 443 (97.1%) participants. 263 of these 430 (61.2%) reached unassisted and 118 (27.4%) reached assisted AVF maturation (overall maturation, 381/430 [88.6%]). Attempted cannulation was less likely in patients of surgeons with policies for routine 2-week versus later-than-2-week first postoperative visits (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.70), routine second postoperative follow-up visits (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97), and a routine clinical postoperative ultrasound (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.55). Attempted cannulation was also less likely among patients undergoing procedures to assist maturation (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.98). Unassisted maturation was more likely for patients treated in facilities with access coordinators (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.17-3.12), but less likely after precannulation nonstudy ultrasounds (OR per ultrasound, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.26-0.68]) and initial unsuccessful cannulation attempts (OR per each additional attempt, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.83-0.98]). Overall maturation was less likely with infiltration before successful cannulation (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89). Among participants receiving maintenance hemodialysis before AVF surgery, unassisted and overall maturation were less likely with longer intervals from surgery to initial cannulation (ORs for each additional month of 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76-0.88] and 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89-0.98], respectively) and from initial to successful cannulation (ORs for each additional week of 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.94] and 0.88 [95% CI, 0.83-0.94], respectively). LIMITATIONS:Surgeons' management policies were assessed only by questionnaire at study onset. Most participants received upper-arm AVFs, planned 2-stage AVFs were excluded, and maturation time windows were imposed. Some care processes may have been missed and the observational design limits causal attribution. CONCLUSIONS:Multiple processes of care and complications are associated with AVF maturation outcomes.
| S-EPMC5916528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hemodialysis patient survival is dependent on the availability of a reliable vascular access. In clinical practice, procedures for vascular access cannulation vary from clinic to clinic. We investigated the impact of cannulation technique on arteriovenous fistula and graft survival. Based on an April 2009 cross-sectional survey of vascular access cannulation practices in 171 dialysis units, a cohort of patients with corresponding vascular access survival information was selected for follow-up ending March 2012. Of the 10,807 patients enrolled in the original survey, access survival data were available for 7058 patients from nine countries. Of these, 90.6% had an arteriovenous fistula and 9.4% arteriovenous graft. Access needling was by area technique for 65.8%, rope-ladder for 28.2%, and buttonhole for 6%. The most common direction of puncture was antegrade with bevel up (43.1%). A Cox regression model was applied, adjusted for within-country effects, and defining as events the need for creation of a new vascular access. Area cannulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of access failure than rope-ladder or buttonhole. Retrograde direction of the arterial needle with bevel down was also associated with an increased failure risk. Patient application of pressure during cannulation appeared more favorable for vascular access longevity than not applying pressure or using a tourniquet. The higher risk of failure associated with venous pressures under 100 or over 150 mm Hg should open a discussion on limits currently considered acceptable.
| S-EPMC4184025 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundIn North America, most people start hemodialysis via a central venous catheter ("catheter"). These patients are counseled to undergo arteriovenous fistula ("fistula") creation within weeks of starting hemodialysis because fistulas are associated with improved survival.ObjectivesTo determine whether attempting to create a fistula in patients who start hemodialysis via a catheter is associated with improved mortality. We also sought to determine whether differences in baseline patient characteristics, vascular procedures for access-related complications, or days in hospital may confound or mediate the relationship between attempted fistula creation and mortality.DesignMulticenter, retrospective cohort study.SettingSix dialysis programs located in Ontario, Alberta, and Manitoba.PatientsPatients aged ≥18 years who initiated hemodialysis via a catheter between January 1, 2004, and May 31, 2012, who had not had a previous attempt at fistula creation. We excluded those who had a life expectancy less than 1 year, who transitioned to peritoneal dialysis within 6 months of starting dialysis, and people who started hemodialysis via a graft.MeasurementsAttempted fistula creation, all-cause mortality, patient characteristics and comorbidities, vascular procedures for access-related complications, and days spent in hospital.MethodsWe used survival methods, including marginal structural models, to account for immortal time bias and time-varying confounding.ResultsIn total, 1832 patients initiated hemodialysis via a catheter during the study period and met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 565 (31%) underwent an attempt at fistula creation following hemodialysis start. As compared to those who did not receive a fistula attempt, these people were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to have started dialysis as an outpatient and to have received pre-dialysis care. In a marginal structural model controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, attempted fistula creation was associated with a significantly lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43-0.66). This effect did not appear to be confounded or mediated by differences in the number of days spent in hospital or vascular procedures for access-related complications. It also remained similar in analyses restricted to patients who survived at least 6 months (HR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.47-0.77) and to patients who started hemodialysis as an outpatient (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.33-0.68).LimitationsThere is likely residual confounding and treatment selection bias.ConclusionsIn this multicenter cohort study, attempting fistula creation in people who started hemodialysis via a catheter was associated with significantly reduced mortality. This reduction in mortality could not be explained by differences in patient characteristics or comorbidities, days spent in hospital, or vascular procedures for access-related complications. Residual confounding or selection bias may explain the observed benefits of fistulas for hemodialysis access.Trial registrationNot applicable (cohort study).
| S-EPMC8326626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectivesCanadian home hemodialysis guidelines highlight the potential differences in complications associated with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation technique as a research priority. Our primary objective was to determine the feasibility of randomizing patients with ESKD training for home hemodialysis to buttonhole versus stepladder cannulation of the AVF. Secondary objectives included training time, pain with needling, complications, and cost by cannulation technique.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsAll patients training for home hemodialysis at seven Canadian hospitals were assessed for eligibility, and demographic information and access type was collected on everyone. Patients who consented to participate were randomized to buttonhole or stepladder cannulation technique. Time to train for home hemodialysis, pain scores on cannulation, and complications over 12 months was recorded. For eligible but not randomized patients, reasons for not participating in the trial were documented.ResultsPatient recruitment was November 2013 to November 2015. During this time, 158 patients began training for home hemodialysis, and 108 were ineligible for the trial. Diabetes mellitus as a cause of ESKD (31% versus 12%) and central venous catheter use (74% versus 6%) were more common in ineligible patients. Of the 50 eligible patients, 14 patients from four out of seven sites consented to participate in the study (28%). The most common reason for declining to participate was a strong preference for a particular cannulation technique (33%). Patients randomized to buttonhole versus stepladder cannulation required a shorter time to complete home hemodialysis training. We did not observe a reduction in cannulation pain or complications with the buttonhole method. Data linkages for a formal cost analysis were not conducted.ConclusionsWe were unable to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a randomized, controlled trial of buttonhole versus stepladder cannulation in Canada with a sufficient number of patients on home hemodialysis to be able to draw meaningful conclusions.
| S-EPMC6419275 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:About half of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) require one or more interventions before successful dialysis use, a process called assisted maturation. Previous research suggested that AVF abandonment and interventions to maintain patency after maturation may be more frequent with assisted maturation versus unassisted maturation. METHODS:Using the US Renal Data System, we retrospectively compared patients with assisted versus unassisted AVF maturation for postmaturation AVF outcomes, including functional primary patency loss (requiring intervention after achieving AVF maturation), AVF abandonment, and frequency of interventions. RESULTS:We included 7301 patients ?67 years who initiated hemodialysis from July 2010 to June 2012 with a catheter and no prior AVF; all had an AVF created within 6 months of starting hemodialysis and used for dialysis (matured) within 6 months of creation, with 2-year postmaturation follow-up. AVFs matured without prior intervention for 56% of the patients. Assisted AVF maturation with one, two, three, or four or more prematuration interventions occurred in 23%, 12%, 5%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Patients with prematuration interventions had significantly increased risk of functional primary patency loss compared with patients who had unassisted AVF maturation, and the risk increased with the number of interventions. Although the likelihood of AVF abandonment was not higher among patients with up to three prematuration interventions compared with patients with unassisted AVF maturation, it was significantly higher among those with four or more interventions. CONCLUSIONS:For this cohort of patients undergoing assisted AVF maturation, we observed a positive association between the number of prematuration AVF interventions and the likelihood of functional primary patency loss and frequency of postmaturation interventions.
| S-EPMC6830790 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceInitial hemodialysis access with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with arteriovenous graft (AVG) and should be the procedure of choice whenever possible. To address the national underuse of AVF in the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid has established an AVF goal of 66% or greater in 2009.ObjectiveTo explore contemporary practice patterns and physician characteristics associated with high AVG use compared with AVF use.Design, setting, and participantsThis review of 100% Medicare Carrier claims between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, includes both inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims data. All patients undergoing initial permanent hemodialysis access placement with an AVF or AVG were included. All surgeons performing more than 10 hemodialysis access procedures during the study period were analyzed.ExposuresPlacement of an AVF or AVG for initial permanent hemodialysis access.Main outcomes and measuresA surgeon-level AVG (vs AVF) use rate was calculated for all included surgeons. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient-level and surgeon-level factors associated with AVG use.ResultsA total of 85 320 patients (median age, 70 [range, 18-103] years; 47 370 men [55.5%]) underwent first-time hemodialysis access placement, of whom 66 489 (77.9%) had an AVF and 18 831 (22.1%) had an AVG. Among the 2397 surgeons who performed more than 10 procedures per year, the median surgeon level AVG use rate was 18.2% (range, 0.0%-96.4%). However, 498 surgeons (20.8%) had an AVG use rate greater than 34%. After accounting for patient characteristics, surgeon factors that were independently associated with AVG use included more than 30 years of clinical practice (vs 21-30 years; odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96]), metropolitan setting (odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.02-1.54]), and vascular surgery specialty (vs general surgery; odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]). Surgeons in the Northeast region had the lowest rate of AVG use (vs the South; odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]). First-time hemodialysis access benchmarking reports for individual surgeons were created for potential distribution.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, one-fifth of surgeons had an AVG use rate above the recommended best practices guideline of 34%. Although some of these differences may be explained by patient referral practices, sharing benchmarked performance data with surgeons could be an actionable step in achieving more high-value care in hemodialysis access surgery.
| S-EPMC6563590 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about acute hemodialysis in the US. Here we describe predictors of receipt of acute hemodialysis in one state and estimate the marginal impact of acute hemodialysis on survival after accounting for confounding due to illness severity.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of acute-care hospitalizations in Pennsylvania from October 2005 to December 2007 using data from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Exposure variable is acute hemodialysis; dependent variable is survival following acute hemodialysis. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine propensity to receive acute hemodialysis and then, for a Cox proportional hazards model, matched acute hemodialysis and non-acute hemodialysis patients 1?5 on this propensity.ResultsIn 2,131,248 admissions of adults without end-stage renal disease, there were 6,657 instances of acute hemodialysis. In analyses adjusted for predicted probability of death upon admission plus other covariates and stratified on age, being male, black, and insured were independent predictors of receipt of acute hemodialysis. One-year post-admission mortality was 43% for those receiving acute hemodialysis, compared to 13% among those not receiving acute hemodialysis. After matching on propensity to receive acute hemodialysis and adjusting for predicted probability of death upon admission, patients who received acute hemodialysis had a higher risk of death than patients who did not over at least 1 year of follow-up (hazard ratio 1·82, 95% confidence interval 1·68-1·97).ConclusionsIn a populous US state, receipt of acute hemodialysis varied by age, sex, race, and insurance status even after adjustment for illness severity. In a comparison of patients with similar propensity to receive acute hemodialysis, those who did receive it were less likely to survive than those who did not. These findings raise questions about reasons for lack of benefit.
| S-EPMC4139312 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe four cannulation techniques, rope ladder (RL), area puncture (AP), buttonhole with blunt needles (BHb), and buttonhole with sharp needles (BHs), affects the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in different ways. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between the different cannulation techniques and the occurrence of AVF complications.MethodsThe study was performed as a national registry-based cohort study using data from the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR). Data were collected from January 2014 to October 2019. Seventy of Sweden's dialysis units participate in the registry. We analyzed a total of 1328 AVFs in this study. The risk of complications was compared between the four different cannulation techniques. The risk of AVF complications was measured by the incidence and incidence rate ratio (IRR). We compared the IRRs of complications between different cannulation techniques.ResultsBHs is the most common cannulation technique in Sweden. It has been used in 55% of the AVFs at some point during their functional patency. BHb (29%), RL (13%), and AP (3%) has been used less. BHb had the lowest risk of complications compared to the other techniques, and a significantly lower risk of stenosis, infiltration, cannulation difficulties, compared to RL and BHs. Cannulation difficulties were significantly more common using AP compared to BHs, and BHb. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique.ConclusionsBHb had the lowest risk of complications. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique. Dialysis units with a low infection rate may continue to use the buttonhole technique, as the risk of complications is lower.
| S-EPMC8265150 | biostudies-literature