Verification of the Abbott Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Cheng A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8532379 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundDetection of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on the use of sensitive, accurate and high throughput RT-PCR assays.ObjectivesWe assessed the analytical performance of the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 (RT-SARS), Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 (AlinSARS) assays and compared the clinical performance of the RT-SARS, AlinSARS, and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex (Alin4Plex) assays to the Seegene Allplex assay (Allplex) and an inhouse test (Inhouse).ResultsWe found 100 % positive percent agreement (PPA) and 100 % negative percent agreement (NPA) comparing RT-SARS and Allplex. RT-SARS, AlinSARS and Inhouse showed 100 % NPA and 100 % PPA across all assays, except for the RdRp target of Inhouse (PPA = 84 %). Similarly, Alin4Plex and Allplex showed high agreement with specimens containing either SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, or RSV. Detection rates of 100 % for SARS-CoV-2 at 50 copies/mL, high precision, and no cross-reactivity with non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens were observed for RT-SARS and AlinSARS. AlinSARS detected SARS-CoV-2 in spiked throat washes and in specimens infected with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha or Beta variants.ConclusionsThe newly developed RT-SARS, AlinSARS, and Alin4Plex assays proved to be useful for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples.
| S-EPMC8532389 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDecember 2021 witnessed an unprecedented increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in addition to the circulation of influenza A and respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV). Due to increased testing demands for SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV associated with the overall increase in symptomatic respiratory infections, there is an urgent need for multiplex, automated, and high throughput assays in the diagnostic laboratories.MethodsWe compared the performance of the NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex to the standard of care influenza A, B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2 assays used at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory. A total of 181 remnant nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens positive for influenza A (n = 29), influenza B (n = 34), RSV (n = 40), SARS-CoV-2 (n = 33), influenza A/RSV (n = 1), and negatives (n = 44) were tested by either or both assays.ResultsBoth the NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays showed 100% total agreement for all the tested analytes. For samples with available cycle threshold (Ct) values, comparable ranges were noted for all targets between the two assays and to the standard of care Ct values as well.ConclusionThe NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays showed high sensitivity and accuracy for all the analytes included in both tests. Implementing these assays will assist the diagnostic laboratories with the surge of testing during the 2021-2022 influenza season.
| S-EPMC9014635 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Mass molecular diagnostic testing for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has drawn on laboratory developed tests, commercial assays, and fully-automated platforms to accommodate widespread demand. The Alinity m instrument by Abbott is capable of detecting several clinically relevant pathogens and has recently received FDA emergency use authorization for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. The Alinity m performs automatic sample preparation, RT-PCR assembly, amplification, detection, and result calculation in under two hours. Here, we validate the performance characteristics of the Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison with the Roche cobas 6800 and Hologic Panther Fusion platforms. Across 178 positive and 195 negative nasopharyngeal swab specimens (CT range 14.30-38.84), the Alinity m detected one additional positive specimen that was found to be negative on the Roche cobas 6800 (PPA 100%, NPA 99.5%). Across a separate set of 30 positive and 174 negative nasopharyngeal swab specimens (CT range 14.1-38.5), the Alinity m had 100% positive and negative agreement with the Hologic Panther Fusion. Using SeraCare SARS-CoV-2 RNA standards, the assay limit of detection was verified to be two-fold more sensitive than the parameters stated by the SARS-CoV-2 AMP kit package insert, at 50 virus copies/mL. Assay specificity was 100% over 20 specimens positive for other respiratory viruses and intraday precision was 100% concordant with <2% CV. These data illst u illustrate the Abbott Alinity m system's high concordance with reference assays and analyti high analytical for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection.
| S-EPMC8118701 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe quality of clinical laboratory service depends on quality laboratory operations and accurate test result interpretation based on reference intervals (RIs). As new analytical systems continue to be developed and improved, previously established RIs must be verified. The Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) has established comprehensive RIs for many biomarkers on several analytical systems. Here, published CALIPER RIs for 28 chemistry assays on the Abbott ARCHITECT were assessed for verification on the newer Alinity system.MethodsAn analytical validation was first completed to assess assay performance. CALIPER serum samples (100) were analyzed for 28 chemistry assays on the Alinity system. The percentage of results falling within published pediatric ARCHITECT reference and confidence limits was determined for each analyte. Based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, if ≥90% of test results fell within confidence limits of ARCHITECT assay RIs, they were considered verified.ResultsOf the 28 assays assessed, 26 met the criteria for verification. Reference values for calcium and magnesium did not meet the criteria for verification with 87% and 35% falling within previously established ARCHITECT confidence limits, respectively. However, both assays could be verified using pediatric RIs provided in the Abbott Alinity package insert.ConclusionsIn this study, CALIPER ARCHITECT RIs were verified on the Alinity system for several chemistry assays. These data demonstrate excellent concordance for most assays between the Abbott ARCHITECT and Alinity systems and will assist in the implementation of the Alinity system in pediatric healthcare institutions.
| S-EPMC9577062 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh-throughput assays for the SARS-CoV-2 virus are critical to increasing test capacity and slowing the spread of COVID-19. Abbott Molecular developed and received emergency use authorization (EUA) to deploy the new RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay, run on the automated m2000sp/rt system.ObjectiveTo evaluate analytical and clinical performance of the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay compared to the SARS-CoV-2 CDC-based laboratory developed test (LDT) in clinical use by the University of Washington Clinical Virology Laboratory (UW Virology).MethodsRealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay limit of detection (LOD) was evaluated by testing two dilution panels of 60 replicates each. Cross-reactivity was evaluated by testing 24 clinical samples positive for various non‒SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses. Clinical performance was evaluated using 30 positive and 30 negative SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples previously tested using the UW Virology SARS-CoV-2 LDT.ResultsExceeding the 100 copies/mL LOD reported in the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay EUA product insert, 19 of 20 replicates were detected at 50 copies/mL and 16 of 20 replicates were detected at 25 copies/mL. All clinical samples positive for 24 non‒SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses were SARS-CoV-2 negative on the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay. The assay had high sensitivity (93%) and specificity (100%) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Two positive samples that tested negative with the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay had cycle numbers of 35.94 or greater and required dilution prior to testing. One of these samples was also inconclusive on the SARS-CoV-2 LDT.ConclusionThe RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay is acceptable for clinical use. With the high-throughput, fully automated m2000 system, this assay will accelerate the pace of SARS-CoV-2 testing.
| S-EPMC7395853 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Critical evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays is needed to guide clinical decision-making and ensure that these assays provide optimal benefit to patients and the public. Here, three commercially available assays with widespread distribution capabilities are compared. A total of 667 specimens, 103 from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 564 collected prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, were analyzed in parallel using the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 total antibody and Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays; a subset of 55 samples from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections was additionally evaluated using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM assay. Qualitative agreement between the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays was 98.7% (658/667), with Cohen's kappa value of 0.919 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.867 to 0.972). Qualitative agreements with the Abbott IgM assay were 92.7% (51/55, Abbott IgG) and 85.5% (47/55, Roche total antibody). Diagnostic specificities determined using pre-COVID-19 samples for the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays were 99.65% (95% CI, 98.72 to 99.90%) and 100.00% (95% CI, 99.32 to 100.00%), respectively, spanning claims made by each manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivities increased for all three assays with increasing time since the onset of symptoms. Among 51 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, 23 (45.1%), 24 (47.1%), and 22 (43.1%) were reactive by the Abbott IgG, Roche total antibody, and Abbott IgM assays, respectively, with sampling times 0 to 56 days post-positive PCR (median/mean, 2/6.2 days). Combining IgG and IgM screening identified 4/55 additional samples with detectable antibodies that would not have been observed using the assays independently. Notably, one immunocompromised patient with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection showed no detectable antibodies using any of the three assays 43 days after onset of symptoms.
| S-EPMC7771433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:Analytical and clinical verification of both old and new generations of the Abbott total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) assays, and an examination of reference Intervals. METHODS:Determination of between-run precision, and Deming comparison between patient sample results for 25OHD on the Abbott Architect, DiaSorin Liaison and AB SCIEX API 4000 (LC-MS/MS). Establishment of uncertainty of measurement for 25OHD Architect methods using old and new generations of the reagents, and estimation of reference interval in healthy Irish population. RESULTS:For between-run precision the manufacturer claims 2.8% coefficients of variation (CVs) of 2.8% and 4.6% for their high and low controls, respectively. Our instrument showed CVs between 4% and 6.2% for all levels of the controls on both generations of the Abbott reagents. The between-run uncertainties were 0.28 and 0.36, with expanded uncertainties 0.87 and 0.98 for the old and the new generations of reagent, respectively. The difference between all methods used for patients' samples was within total allowable error, and the instruments produced clinically equivalent results. The results covered the medical decision points of 30, 40, 50 and 125 nmol/L. The reference interval for total 25OHD in our healthy Irish subjects was lower than recommended levels (24-111 nmol/L). CONCLUSION:In a clinical laboratory Abbott 25OHD immunoassays are a useful, rapid and accurate method for measuring total 25OHD. The new generation of the assay was confirmed to be reliable, accurate, and a good indicator for 25OHD measurement. More study is needed to establish reference intervals that correctly represent the healthy population in Ireland.
| S-EPMC5575431 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) show comparable or very similar manifestations, the therapeutic approaches of these respiratory viral infections are different, which requires an accurate diagnosis. Recently, the novel multiplex real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay AMPLIQUICK® Respiratory Triplex (BioSynex SA, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) allows simultaneous detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and RSV in respiratory tract samples. We herein evaluated the performance of the AMPLIQUICK® Respiratory Triplex for the detection of the four viruses in respiratory specimens, using Allplex™ Respiratory Panel 1 and 2019-nCoV assays (Seegene, Seoul, Korea) as reference comparator assays. A total of 359 archived predetermined respiratory samples, including 83, 145, 19 and 95 positive specimens for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B and RSV respectively, were included. The AMPLIQUICK® Respiratory Triplex showed high concordance with the reference assays, with an overall agreement for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and RSV at 97.6%, 98.8%, 98.3% and 100.0%, respectively, and high κ values ranging from 0.93 to 1.00, indicating an almost perfect agreement between assays. Furthermore, high correlations of cycle threshold (Ct) values were observed for positive samples of the four viruses between the AMPLIQUICK® Respiratory Triplex and comparator assays, with an overall high agreement between Ct values assessed by Bland-Altman analyses. In conclusion, these observations demonstrate that the multiplex AMPLIQUICK® Respiratory Triplex is a reliable assay for the qualitative detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and RSV in respiratory specimens, which may prove useful for streamlining diagnostics during the winter influenza-seasons.
| S-EPMC8730414 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8956294 | biostudies-literature
Project description:During the COVID-19 pandemic, sample pooling has proven an effective strategy to overcome the limitations of reagent shortages and expand laboratory testing capacity. The inclusion of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in a multiplex tandem PCR platform with SARS-CoV-2 provides useful diagnostic and infection control information. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the influenza and RSV targets in the AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2, Influenza and RSV 8-well assay, including the effect of pooling samples on target detection. RSV target detection in clinical samples was compared to the Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV assay as a reference standard. Samples were then tested in pools of four and detection rates were compared. Owing to the unavailability of clinical samples for influenza, only the effect of sample pooling on simulated samples was evaluated for these targets. RSV was detected in neat clinical samples with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.5% compared to the reference standard, demonstrating 99.7% agreement. This study demonstrates that sample pooling by four increases the average Ct value by 2.24, 2.29, 2.20 and 1.91 cycles for the target's influenza A, influenza A typing, influenza B and RSV, respectively. The commercial AusDiagnostics SARS-CoV-2, Influenza and RSV 8-well assay was able to detect influenza and RSV at an intermediate concentration within the limit of detection of the assay. Further studies to explore the applicability of sample pooling at the lower limit of detection of the assay is needed. Nevertheless, sample pooling has shown to be a viable strategy to increase testing throughput and reduce reagent usage. In addition, the multiplexed platform targeting various respiratory viruses assists with public health and infection control responses, clinical care, and patient management.
| S-EPMC9021007 | biostudies-literature