Dataset Information

Assessment of Stimulant Use and Cardiovascular Event Risks Among Older Adults

ABSTRACT: This cohort study investigates the association of prescription stimulant use with risk of cardiovascular events among adults aged 66 years and older. Key Points

Question

Is prescription stimulant use associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events among adults aged 66 years and older?

Findings

In this cohort study of 6457 older adults who initiated stimulant use and 24 853 matched older adults who did not initiate such use, stimulant use was associated with a 40% increase in CV events within 30 days of initiation. Risk attenuated over time, with no association with increased risk at 180 days or 365 days after initiation.

Meaning

These findings suggest that safety considerations should be included when stimulants are prescribed to older adults.

Importance

Use of stimulants continues to increase among older adults for a variety of indications. An association between stimulant use and increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events has been established among children and young adults, but few studies have explored the risk of CV events among older patients, a group with increased baseline risk.

Objective

To evaluate the association between stimulant use and risk of CV events among older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This propensity score–matched cohort study, with 4 nonusers per 1 user, was conducted from July 1, 2017, to June 27, 2019, using data from population-based health care databases from Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2016. Included individuals were outpatients aged 66 years or older.

Exposures

Initiation of a prescription stimulant.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a CV event, defined as a composite of emergency department visit or hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), or ventricular arrhythmia. Risk of CV event was assessed at 30 days, 180 days, and 365 days after initiation of stimulants from Cox proportional hazard models. A secondary analysis assessed each component of the primary outcome separately.

Results

Among 6457 older adults who initiated a prescription stimulant (ie, the exposed group) and 24 853 older adults who did not initiate such treatment (ie, the unexposed group), the distribution of baseline patient characteristics was well balanced after matching (sex: 3173 [49.1%] men vs 12 112 [48.7%] men; standardized difference, 0.01; median [IQR] age: 74 [69-80] years vs 74 [69-80] years; standardized difference, 0.01). Within this cohort, there were 932 CV events during the 365-day follow-up (5.11 events per 100 person-years among individuals who initiated stimulants). In the primary analysis, stimulant initiation was associated with increased risk of CV events at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) but not at 180 days (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.6) or 365 days (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8). In the secondary analysis, stimulant initiation was associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.7) and stroke or TIA (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1) at 30 days.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that stimulant use was associated with an early increase in CV events among older adults with no association for long-term use.

SUBMITTER: Tadrous M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8546494 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionHot and cold weather events are increasingly becoming a global burden resulting in premature and preventable morbidity and mortality, particularly in vulnerable groups such as older people and people with chronic health conditions. However, risk perception regarding weather is generally poor among vulnerable groups which often acts as a barrier to the uptake of critical health-protective behaviours. A more cohesive understanding of determinants of risk perception is needed to inform public health risk communication and behaviour change interventions that promote protective health behaviours. This scoping literature review aimed to understand factors influencing perception of personal health risks in vulnerable groups as a result of exposure to hot and cold weather events.MethodsA five-stage scoping review framework was followed. Searches were run across Medline, PsychInfo, Web of Science and EMBASE. Papers were included if they provided rationale for risk perceptions in vulnerable groups in indoor/domestic environments and focussed on samples from OECD countries.ResultsIn total, 13 out of 15,554 papers met the full inclusion criteria. The majority of papers focused on hot weather events: one study exclusively examined cold weather events and one study addressed both cold and hot weather events. Included papers focused on older adults aged 65+ years. The papers identified eight factors that were associated with older adults' personal health risk perception of hot and cold weather events: (1) Knowledge of the relationship between hot/cold weather and health risks, (2) presence of comorbidities, (3) age and self-identity, (4) perceived weather severity, (5) Beliefs associated with regional climate, (6) past experience with weather, (7) misconceptions of effectiveness of protective behaviours, and (8) external locus of control.ConclusionsFuture research should explore risk communication methods by implementing the identified risk perception determinants from this review into health protection interventions targeting older adults. Further understanding is needed regarding risk perceptions in non-elderly vulnerable groups, for examples individuals with chronic diseases or disabilities.

Project description:Background/objectivesNon-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) play central roles in the relationship between adiposity and glucose metabolism, and they have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, but few studies have assessed their effects on complex geriatric syndromes like frailty that cross multiple organ systems. We sought to determine the relationships between NEFAs and incident frailty, disability, and mobility limitation in a population-based cohort of older persons.MethodsWe analyzed 4,710 Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) participants who underwent measurement of circulating total fasting NEFAs in 1992-1993 and were assessed for frailty in 1996-1997 and for disability and mobility limitation annually. We used ordinal logistic regression to model incident frailty, linear regression to model components of frailty, and Cox regression to model disability and mobility limitation in relation to baseline NEFAs. To ensure proportional hazards, we truncated follow-up at 9 years for disability and 6.5 years for mobility limitation.ResultsA total of 42 participants became frail and 510 became pre-frail over a 4-year period, and we documented 1,720 cases of disability and 1,225 cases of mobility limitation during follow-up. NEFAs were positively associated in a dose-dependent manner with higher risks of incident frailty, disability, and mobility limitation. The adjusted odds ratios for frailty were 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.86; P = .04) across extreme tertiles and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.03-1.33; P = .01) per standard deviation increment. The corresponding hazard ratios for incident disability were 1.14 (95% CI = 1.01-1.30; P = .04) and 1.11 (95% CI = 1.06-1.17; P < .0001); those for incident mobility limitation were 1.23 (95% CI = 1.06-1.43; P = .006) and 1.15 (95% CI = 1.08-1.22; P < .0001). Results were largely consistent among both men and women. Among individual components of frailty, NEFAs were significantly associated with self-reported exhaustion (β = .07; standard error = .03; P = .02).ConclusionCirculating NEFAs are significantly associated with frailty, disability, and mobility limitation among older adults. These results highlight the broad spectrum of adverse health issues associated with NEFA in older adults.

Project description:ImportanceHigher amounts of physical activity are associated with increased longevity. However, whether different leisure time physical activity types are differentially associated with mortality risk is not established.ObjectivesTo examine whether participation in equivalent amounts of physical activity (7.5 to <15 metabolic equivalent of task [MET] hours per week) through different activity types is associated with mortality risk and to investigate the shape of the dose-response association.Design, setting, and participantsParticipants in this cohort were respondents from the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study who completed the follow-up questionnaire between 2004 and 2005. This questionnaire collected data on weekly durations of different types of physical activities. Mortality was ascertained through December 31, 2019.ExposuresMET hours per week spent participating in the following activities: running, cycling, swimming, other aerobic exercise, racquet sports, golf, and walking for exercise.Main outcomes and measuresAll-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Separate multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of mortality for each of the 7 types of leisure time physical activities, as well as the sum of these activities.ResultsA total of 272 550 participants (157 415 men [58%]; mean [SD] age at baseline, 70.5 [5.4] years [range, 59-82 years]) provided information on types of leisure time activity, and 118 153 (43%) died during a mean (SD) follow-up of 12.4 (3.9) years. In comparison with those who did not participate in each activity, 7.5 to less than 15 MET hours per week of racquet sports (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93) and running (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92) were associated with the greatest relative risk reductions for all-cause mortality, followed by walking for exercise (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93), other aerobic activity (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95), golf (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97), swimming (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98), and cycling (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Each activity showed a curvilinear dose-response association with mortality risk; low MET hours per week of physical activity for any given activity type were associated with a large reduction in mortality risk, with diminishing returns for each increment in activity thereafter. Associations were similar for cardiovascular and cancer mortality.Conclusions and relevanceThis cohort study of older individuals found differences between different types of leisure time activities and mortality risk, but there were significant associations between participating in 7.5 to less than 15 MET hours per week of any activity and mortality risk.