Dataset Information

Physiological and anatomical responses to drought stress differ between two larch species and their hybrid

ABSTRACT:

Key Message

Hybrid saplings were more reactive to soil water deficit than Japanese and European larch. European larch had hydraulically safer wood and anisohydric behavior, Japanese and hybrid larch showed isohydric strategy.

Abstract

Deciduous larch species could be an alternative to evergreen conifers in reforestation, but little is known about drought sensitivity of their saplings. The effect of an experimental drought on hydraulics and quantitative wood anatomy was tested on saplings of European larch (EL, Larix decidua), Japanese larch (JL, Larix kaempferi) and their hybrid (HL). Across species, biomass, transpiration rate and relative water content were higher in controls than in drought stressed trees, but transpiration efficiency was lower. JL had the highest transpiration efficiency under drought, and EL the lowest, coinciding with slower growth of EL. Wood of EL formed before drought was hydraulically safer as shown by higher wall/lumen ratio and lower pit cavity area. EL neither had a significant increase in transpiration efficiency nor a reduction in transpiration rate under drought, suggesting that the stomata remained open under soil water deficit. HL saplings were the most reactive to water shortage, indicated by intra-annual density fluctuations and a decrease in relative water content of the sapwood. Significant reduction in transpiration by HL suggested a higher stomatal sensitivity, while the same leaf surface area was maintained and radial growth was still similar to its best parent, the JL. The latter showed a significantly lower leaf surface area under drought than controls. EL, with its hydraulically safer wood, followed an anisohydric behavior, while JL and HL revealed an isohydric strategy. Altogether, our results suggest species dependent acclimations to drought stress, whereby HL followed the strategy of JL rather than that of EL.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00468-021-02129-4.

SUBMITTER: Sasani N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8550302 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Quinoa is an important economic food crop. However, quinoa seedlings are susceptible to drought stress, and the molecular mechanism of drought tolerance remains unclear. In this study, we compared transcriptomic and physiological analyses of drought-tolerant (L1) and susceptible (HZ1) genotypes exposed to 20% PEG for 3 and 9 days at seedling stage. Compared with HZ1, drought stress had less damage to photosynthetic system, and the contents of SOD, POD and CAT were higher and the contents of H2O2 and O2 -were lower in L1 leaves. Based on the RNA-seq method, we identified 2423, 11856, 1138 and 3903 (HZ1-C3-VS-T3, HZ1-C9-vs-T9, L1-C3-vs-T3 and L1-C9-vs-T9) annotated DEGs. Go enrichment was shown in terms of Biological Process: DEGs involved in biological processes such as metabolic process, cellular process, and single-organism process were most abundant in all four comparison treatments. In Molecular Function: the molecular functions of catalytic activity, binding and transporter activity have the most DEGs in all four processes. Cellular Component: membrane, membrane part, and cell have the most DEGs in each of the four processes. These DEGs include AP2/ERF, MYB, bHLH, b-ZIP, WRKY, HD-ZIP, NAC, C3h and MADS, which encode transcription factors. In addition, the MAPK pathway, starch and sucrose metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and plant hormone signal transduction were significantly induced under drought stress, among them, G-hydrolases-66, G-hydrolases-81, G-hydrolases-78, Su-synthase-02, Su-synthase-04, Su-synthase-06, BRI1-20 and bHLH17 were all downregulated at two drought stress points in two genotypes, PP2C01, PP2C03, PP2C05-PP2C07, PP2C10, F-box01 and F-box02 were upregulated at two drought stress points in two genotypes. These results agree with the physiological responses and RNA-seq results. Collectively, these findings may lead to a better understanding of drought tolerance, and some of the important DEGs detected in this study could be targeted for future research. And our results will provide a comprehensive basis for the molecular network that mediates drought tolerance in quinoa seedlings and promote the breeding of drought-resistant quinoa varieties.

Project description:Drought is a major environmental stress that can have severe impacts on plant productivity and survival. Understanding molecular mechanisms of drought responses is crucial in order to breed for drought adapted plant cultivars. The aim of the present study was to investigate phenotypic and transcriptional drought responses in two willow genotypes (520 and 592) originating from an experimental cross between S. viminalis × (S. viminalis × S. schwerinii). Willows are woody perennials in the Salicaceae plant family that are grown as bioenergy crops worldwide.An experiment was conducted where plants were exposed to drought and different eco-physiological parameters were assessed. RNA-seq data was furthermore generated with the Illumina technology from root tips and leaves from plants grown in drought and well-watered (WW) conditions. The RNA-seq data was assembled de novo with the Trinity assembler to create a reference gene set to which the reads were mapped in order to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the drought and WW conditions. To investigate molecular mechanisms involved in the drought response, GO enrichment analyses were conducted. Candidate genes with a putative function in the drought response were also identified.A total of 52,599 gene models were obtained and after filtering on gene expression (FPKM ? 1), 35,733 gene models remained, of which 24,421 contained open reading frames. A total of 5,112 unique DEGs were identified between drought and WW conditions, of which the majority were found in the root tips. Phenotypically, genotype 592 displayed less growth reduction in response to drought compared to genotype 520. At the transcriptional level, genotype 520 displayed a greater response in the leaves as more DEGs were found in genotype 520 compared to genotype 592. In contrast, the transcriptional responses in the root tips were rather similar between the two genotypes. A core set of candidate genes encoding proteins with a putative function in drought response was identified, for example MYBs and bZIPs as well as chlorophyll a/b binding proteins.We found substantial differences in drought responses between the genotypes, both at the phenotypic and transcriptional levels. In addition to the genotypic variation in several traits, we also found indications for genotypic variation in trait plasticity, which could play a role in drought adaptation. Furthermore, the two genotypes displayed overall similar transcriptional responses in the root tips, but more variation in the leaves. It is thus possible that the observed phenotypic differences could be a result of transcriptional differences mostly at the leaf level.This study has contributed to a better general understanding of drought responses in woody plants, specifically in willows, and has implications for breeding research towards more drought adapted plants.